Level of Implementation of Integrated Learning Experiences and its Effect on Grade 1 Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Vilma S. Cangayo University of Saint Anthony, Iriga City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20775772

Keywords:

Grade 1 learning outcomes, integrated learning experiences, ILE implementation, MATATAG Curriculum, school heads, teachers

Abstract

This study determined the level of implementation of Integrated Learning Experiences (ILE) and its effect on Grade 1 learning outcomes in the 5th Congressional District of Camarines Sur during School Year 2025-2026. A descriptive-evaluative survey method was employed using a validated questionnaire. The respondents were 175 school heads and 300 Grade 1 teachers from public elementary schools, representing 100% of the target population. Data were analyzed using frequency distribution, percentage, weighted mean, a five-point rating scale, and the Mann-Whitney U test. Findings showed that the overall implementation of ILE was much evident (M = 4.18). Among the implementation dimensions, evaluation and assessment obtained the highest rating (M = 4.21, very much evident), followed by classroom management (M = 4.19), lesson implementation (M = 4.18), and planning for ILE lessons (M = 4.14), all interpreted as much evident. Significant differences were found in the assessment of school heads and teachers across the four implementation dimensions. In terms of learning outcomes, GMRC was rated much evident (M = 3.86), while Makabansa (M = 3.33), Mathematics (M = 3.33), Reading and Literacy (M = 2.74), and Language (M = 2.71) were moderately evident. No significant differences were found for Reading and Literacy, Language, and Makabansa, while significant differences were found for Mathematics and GMRC. Challenges in implementing ILE were rated very much challenging (M = 4.21), particularly the lack of adequate support systems and professional development. The study concludes that ILE is generally implemented, but stronger support, resources, professional development, and assessment practices are needed to maximize its effect on Grade 1 learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, K. (2020). Explicit teaching and structured learning in basic education. Journal of Educational Practice, 11(4), 44-52.

Ansong, D., et al. (2024). Teacher support and learner outcomes in classroom instruction. Educational Research and Reviews, 19(2), 35-48.

Bao, Y., et al. (2022). Teacher engagement, self-efficacy, and learner success in language learning contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, Article 103642.

Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2021). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.

Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 010, s. 2024: Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum. Department of Education. https://www.deped.gov.ph/

Garad, A. A. (2019). Knowledge, perception, practices, and challenges of assessment for learning. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 24(6), 21-33.

Hughes, C. A., Morris, J. R., Therrien, W. J., & Benson, S. K. (2019). Explicit instruction: Historical and contemporary contexts. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 34(3), 140-148.

Inayat, A., & Ali, A. Z. (2020). Influence of teaching style on students' engagement, curiosity and exploration in the classroom. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 7(1), 87-102.

Kanya, N. (2021). Factors affecting teacher performance in basic education. International Journal of Education and Learning, 3(2), 89-99.

Koçak, O., Göksu, I., & Göktaş, Y. (2021). The factors affecting academic achievement: A systematic review of meta-analyses. International Online Journal of Education, 8(1), 480-484.

Marinda, L. (2019). Teachers' knowledge and planning for instruction. Literacy Research and Instruction, 60(14), 172-179.

Martinez, I., et al. (2019). Theory and application of integrated learning. Philippine Journal of Elementary Education, 9(2), 88-93.

Merlo, M. (2022). Teacher performance and learner academic success. Journal of Educational Development, 14(2), 55-67.

Milanković, J. (2022). Attitudes of elementary school students and teachers towards integrative teaching model. International Journal of Educational Research, 55(11), 36-47.

Naatonis, R. N., Masitoh, S., & Nursalim, M. (2022). Perspectives on the philosophy of education: Progressivism in learning models. Journal Studi Keislaman, 13(2), 127-133.

Oliver, K. M. (2020). Methods for developing constructivist learning on the web. Educational Technology, 40(9), 48-51.

Padillo, G. (2021). Teacher challenges and innovative teaching practices in basic education. Journal of Teacher Education and Research, 16(1), 18-30.

Regional Memorandum No. 01162, s. 2024. Guidelines in the implementation of the Integrated Learning Experiences (ILE) as an integrative teaching approach for early-grade learners in Region V. Department of Education Regional Office V. https://www.deped.gov.ph/

Renninger, K. A., & Bachrach, J. E. (2022). Studying triggers for interest and engagement using observational methods. Educational Psychologist, 57(1), 12-28.

Santos, D., & Revilla, S. (2022). Assessment essentials: Planning, implementing and improving assessment. Journal of Organizational and Educational Leadership, 15(3), 33-37.

Sarmiento, R. C. (2022). Parental involvement in values formation: Implications for home-school collaboration. The Educator's Forum, 11(2), 25-37.

Sharma, P., et al. (2023). Active learning and learner engagement in contemporary classrooms. Journal of Learning Innovation, 8(1), 15-29.

Spencer, M., et al. (2022). Early oral language skills and reading development: A longitudinal study. Journal of Child Language, 49(10), 512-519.

Usher, E. L., & Pajares, F. (2021). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66(14), 543-578.

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(2), 51-55.

Zitha, I., et al. (2023). Learner engagement and academic success in integrated learning environments. Journal of Education and Human Development, 12(1), 21-34.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-20

How to Cite

Cangayo, V. (2026). Level of Implementation of Integrated Learning Experiences and its Effect on Grade 1 Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1310-1318. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20775772

Similar Articles

1-10 of 446

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.