Instructional Clarity and Learning Task Commitment in Adolescent Classrooms

Authors

  • Josephine C. Mora Northeastern College Author
  • Genesis N. Damaso Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21074745

Keywords:

adolescent classrooms, feedback for improvement, instructional clarity, learning task commitment, secondary learners, student engagement

Abstract

This study located instructional clarity as a practical classroom condition that could strengthen adolescents’ willingness to remain engaged with learning tasks. It determined the level of instructional clarity, assessed the level of learning task commitment, and examined the relationship and predictive influence of clarity-related teaching practices on students’ task commitment in junior high school classrooms. Using a quantitative explanatory-predictive design, the study gathered data from junior high school learners through a validated and reliability-tested questionnaire. The instrument measured instructional clarity in terms of lesson goal communication, clarity of directions, explanation and modeling, success criteria, checking for understanding, and feedback for improvement. Learning task commitment was measured through attention, task initiation, persistence, responsibility, participation, output improvement, and use of feedback. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, Pearson product-moment correlation, hierarchical multiple regression, and dominance analysis. Results showed that instructional clarity and learning task commitment were both rated high. However, relatively lower ratings were noted in students’ asking of questions, use of feedback, and persistence when tasks became difficult. A strong positive and significant relationship was found between instructional clarity and learning task commitment. Regression findings further revealed that feedback for improvement, checking for understanding, and explanation and modeling were the strongest predictors of students’ commitment to learning tasks. The study concluded that adolescents were more likely to sustain attention, effort, and responsibility when teachers made learning expectations clear and provided responsive guidance during task performance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Evans, P., Vansteenkiste, M., Parker, P. D., Kingsford-Smith, A., & Zhou, S. (2024). Cognitive load theory and its relationships with motivation: A self-determination theory perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09841-2

Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel: A synthesis of over 2,100 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003380542

Li, J., & Xue, E. (2023). Dynamic interaction between student learning behaviour and learning environment: Meta-analysis of student engagement and its influencing factors. Behavioral Sciences, 13(1), Article 59. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs13010059

Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.013

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 results: Volume I: The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results: Volume II: Learning during and from disruption. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a97db61c-en

OECD. (2023c). PISA 2022 results, Volume I and II: Country note: Philippines. OECD Publishing.

Oschwald, A., Moeller, J., Kracke, B., Viljaranta, J., & Dietrich, J. (2025). Student motivation and instructional clarity: Linking experience sampling method data to objective behavioural observations. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(Suppl. 1), S281-S299. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12775

Serki, N., & Bolkan, S. (2024). The effect of clarity on learning: Impacting motivation through cognitive load. Communication Education, 73(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2023.2250883

Teig, N., & Nilsen, T. (2022). Profiles of instructional quality in primary and secondary education: Patterns, predictors, and relations to student achievement and motivation in science. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 74, Article 101170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101170

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Mora, J., & Damaso, G. (2026). Instructional Clarity and Learning Task Commitment in Adolescent Classrooms. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1761-1772. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21074745

Similar Articles

21-30 of 429

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)