Morphological Awareness Instruction and Word-Level Literacy Development among Secondary Learners

Authors

  • Luis D. Umayam Northeastern College Author
  • Michelle S. Morales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21397995

Keywords:

academic vocabulary, morphological awareness, morphological decoding, secondary learners, word recognition, word-level literacy

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of morphological awareness instruction in improving word-level literacy among secondary learners at Santo Tomas National High School, Santo Tomas, Isabela. A switching-replications quasi-experimental design with repeated measurements was employed, allowing two instructional sequences to receive the intervention during separate phases. The program provided explicit instruction in morpheme identification, word decomposition, affix meaning, derivational production, word-family construction, morphological decoding, and interpretation of unfamiliar complex words. Data were gathered through a validated Morphological Awareness and Word-Level Literacy Battery administered at baseline, after the first instructional phase, and after the second phase. Linear mixed-effects growth models, planned contrasts, Hedges’ corrected effect sizes, and bootstrap confidence intervals were used to evaluate instructional gains, replication, and maintenance. Results showed significant improvements in morphological awareness and word-level literacy after exposure to the intervention. Large effects were observed in word decomposition, derivational production, morphological decoding, and complex-word recognition. The second instructional sequence demonstrated comparable gains after receiving the program, confirming the replicability of the instructional effect. Performance was maintained after direct instruction had ended, although difficulties remained in morphological spelling, unfamiliar word interpretation, and academic word-form use. The findings indicated that explicit attention to roots, prefixes, suffixes, and related word forms strengthened learners’ ability to process complex words. Integrating morphology-based activities into English and subject-area instruction was therefore recommended to support sustained vocabulary, decoding, spelling, and word-recognition development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Colenbrander, D., von Hagen, A., Kohnen, S., Wegener, S., Ko, K., Beyersmann, E., Behzadnia, A., Parrila, R., & Castles, A. (2024). The effects of morphological instruction on literacy outcomes for children in English-speaking countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36, Article 119. doi:10.1007/s10648-024-09953-3

Crosson, A. C., Kieffer, M. J., McKeown, M. G., & Nagy, W. (2025). Cross-language morphological analysis improves academic word learning for multilingual adolescents. Scientific Studies of Reading, 29(1), 55–84. doi:10.1080/10888438.2024.2415916

Deacon, S. H., Tong, X., & Francis, K. (2017). The relationship of morphological analysis and morphological decoding to reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12056

Georgiou, G. K., Vieira, A. P. A., Rothou, K. M., Kirby, J. R., Antoniuk, A., Martinez, D., & Guo, K. (2023). A meta-analysis of morphological awareness deficits in developmental dyslexia. Scientific Studies of Reading, 27(3), 253–271. doi:10.1080/10888438.2022.2155524

Glisson, L., Tutty, R., Heine, C., Burke, C., Hughes, L., Dawson, N., & Ebbels, S. H. (2025). Morphemes matter: A small scale randomised control trial of vocabulary intervention focusing on affixes for adolescents with (developmental) language disorder. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1–19. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/17549507.2025.2526539

Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., & Reynolds, D. (2022). Unraveling adolescent language & reading comprehension: The monster’s data. Scientific Studies of Reading, 26(4), 305–326. doi:10.1080/10888438.2021.1989437

Goodwin, A. P., Petscher, Y., & Tock, J. (2020). Morphological supports: Investigating differences in how morphological knowledge supports reading comprehension for middle school students with limited reading vocabulary. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 51(3), 589–602. doi:10.1044/2020_LSHSS-19-00031

Green, L., & Steele, R. (2019). Improving the derivational morphological skills of a ninth grader with language and reading disabilities: A public school case study. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 4(5), 759–770. doi:10.1044/2019_PERS-SIG1-2019-0004

Green, L. B., & Wolter, J. A. (2025). Morphological awareness: Connecting language foundations and academic literacy success for students with language and literacy deficits. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 56(3), 506–521. doi:10.1044/2025_LSHSS-24-00119

James, E., Currie, N. K., Tong, S. X., & Cain, K. (2021). The relations between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in beginner readers to young adolescents. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 110–130. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12316

Lee, J. W., & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2024). The relations of morphological awareness with vocabulary, word reading, and reading comprehension for Korean-speaking middle school students. Reading and Writing, 37, 2665–2686. doi:10.1007/s11145-023-10491-7

Lee, J. W., Wolters, A., & Kim, Y.-S. G. (2023). The relations of morphological awareness with language and literacy skills vary depending on orthographic depth and nature of morphological awareness. Review of Educational Research, 93(4), 528–558. doi:10.3102/00346543221123816

Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: Advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 10–26. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12313

Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). Morphological awareness and reading comprehension: Examining mediating factors. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 160, 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.02.015

Li, Y., & Chen, S. (2016). Relative effectiveness of phonological and morphological awareness training on L2 word reading in EFL children. System, 60, 93–104. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.06.005

Liu, Y., Groen, M. A., & Cain, K. (2024). The association between morphological awareness and reading comprehension in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 42, Article 100571. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100571

Mendes, B. B., & Kirby, J. R. (2024). The effects of a morphological awareness intervention on reading and spelling ability of children with dyslexia. Learning Disability Quarterly, 47(4), 222–233. doi:10.1177/07319487241259775

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes: Philippines. OECD Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-16

How to Cite

Umayam, L., & Morales, M. (2026). Morphological Awareness Instruction and Word-Level Literacy Development among Secondary Learners. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(7), 778-792. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21397995

Similar Articles

21-30 of 477

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.