Sensory Acceptability of Squash (Cucurbita maxima) and Water Spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) Pancake
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21429562Keywords:
Cucurbita maxima, Ipomoea aquatica, sensory evaluation, hedonic testing, functional foods, pancake formulationAbstract
The growing demand for healthier and nutrient-enriched food products has encouraged the incorporation of vegetables into commonly consumed foods. This study aimed to develop and evaluate the sensory acceptability of pancakes enriched with squash (Cucurbita maxima) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). Specifically, the study assessed the acceptability of three pancake formulations in terms of appearance, aroma, taste, texture, and overall acceptability and determined whether significant differences existed among the formulations. A quasi-experimental research design was employed, involving three formulations with varying proportions of squash and water spinach. Sensory evaluation was conducted using a 9-point Hedonic Rating Scale administered to 100 purposively selected respondents. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at a 0.05 level of significance. Results revealed that all formulations were highly acceptable, with mean ratings ranging from 8.55 to 8.80, corresponding to the verbal interpretation “Like Extremely.” Among the formulations, Treatment 3 obtained the highest overall acceptability rating (M = 8.80, SD = 0.42), indicating superior consumer preference. However, ANOVA results showed no significant differences among the three formulations in terms of appearance (p = 0.38082), aroma (p = 0.22244), taste (p = 0.09555), texture (p = 0.21577), and overall acceptability (p = 0.06512). The findings suggest that squash and water spinach can be successfully incorporated into pancake formulations without compromising sensory quality. The study highlights the potential of these locally available vegetables as functional food ingredients for the development of nutritious, acceptable, and innovative food products.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. N., Rahman, M. M., Islam, M. S., & Hossain, M. A. (2024). Nutritional composition, bioactive compounds, and health-promoting properties of Ipomoea aquatica: A review. Food Production, Processing and Nutrition, 6(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43014-023-00173-w
Aguiar, L., Santos, M., Silva, J., Ribeiro, R., & Ferreira, A. (2020). Consumer acceptance of pumpkin-based baked goods. Food Science & Nutrition, 8(4), 1572–1579.
Alam, M. A., Rahman, M. M., & Islam, M. S. (2023). Nutritional composition, phytochemical constituents, and health-promoting properties of Ipomoea aquatica: A review. Heliyon, 9(8), e18847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e18847
Andrade-Mahecha, M. M., Lemos, D. C., & Torres, J. A. (2019). Pancake ready mix enriched with dehydrated squash pulp (Cucurbita moschata): Formulation and shelf life. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 56(11), 5040–5048.
Aydar, E. F., Tutuncu, S., & Ozcelik, B. (2023). Development of vegetable-enriched bakery products and their impact on consumer acceptability: A review. Foods, 12(8), 1634. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods12081634
Azeem, M., Mu, T. H., Zhang, M., & Chen, J. W. (2021). Nutritional and functional properties of pumpkin and pumpkin-based products: A review. Food Reviews International, 37(7), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/87559129.2020.1734623
Bartolome, R. G., Palita, J. R. S., Dela Cruz, C. G., Bernardez, J. S., & Barrosa, D. B. (2023). Acceptability of pandesal enriched with kangkong leaves (Undergraduate thesis). Capiz State University, Pilar Satellite College.
Batool, M., Ranjha, M. M. A. N., Roobab, U., Manzoor, M. F., Farooq, U., Nadeem, H. R., Nadeem, M., Kanwal, R., AbdElgawad, H., Al Jaouni, S. K., Selim, S., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2022). Nutritional value, phytochemical potential, and therapeutic benefits of pumpkin (Cucurbita sp.). Plants, 11(11), 1394. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants11111394
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: Complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Campos, L., Garcia, T., Martinez, E., & Rodriguez, P. (2020). Impact of gluten-free and vegetable-based ingredients on the sensory properties of baked goods. Journal of Culinary Science & Technology, 18(3), 204–218.
Capili, B., & Anastasi, J. K. (2024). An introduction to types of quasi-experimental designs. American Journal of Nursing, 124(11), 50–52. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0001081740.74815.20
Cham, H., Lee, H., & Migunov, I. (2024). Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference: An overview. Asia Pacific Education Review, 25(3), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-024-09981-2
De Paula, C. D., Pastrana-Puche, Y. I., & Viloria-Benítez, K. M. (2021). Physicochemical and sensory evaluation of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) restructured products produced in the Sinu Valley, Colombia. Heliyon, 7(8), e07691.
Delmoro, B. J. B., Abaldonado, J., Alcazaren, A. A., Parohinog, M. E., & Delfin, G. (2023). Acceptability of kangkong polvoron (Undergraduate thesis). Capiz State University, Pilar Satellite College.
Gebremariam, M., Assefa, Z., & Tadesse, F. (2022). Effects of blending ratios and baking temperature on physicochemical properties and sensory acceptability of biscuits prepared from pumpkin, common bean, and wheat composite flour. Heliyon, 8(10), e10848.
Granato, D., Barba, F. J., Kovačević, D. B., Lorenzo, J. M., Cruz, A. G., & Putnik, P. (2020). Functional foods: Product development, technological trends, efficacy testing, and safety. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology, 11, 93–118. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-032519-051708
Guiné, R. P. F. (2022). Textural properties of bakery products: A review of instrumental and sensory evaluation studies. Applied Sciences, 12(17), 8628.
Gupta, A., Yadav, N., & Verma, S. (2019). Nutritional evaluation of value-added products incorporated with underutilized water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) leaves. Acta Horticulturae, 1241, 617–624.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2022). Multivariate data analysis (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Huey, S. L., Bhargava, A., Friesen, V. M., Bhargava, M., & Mehta, S. (2024). Sensory acceptability of biofortified foods and food products: A systematic review. Nutrition Reviews, 82(7), 892–912. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuad100
Journal of Food Science. (2023). Advances in sensory science: From perception to consumer acceptance. Journal of Food Science, 88(S1), A2–A4.
Kim, T. K. (2024). Understanding one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and its application in research. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 77(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.4097/kja.23087
Lim, J. (2023). Hedonic scaling and consumer acceptance testing in sensory evaluation. Food Quality and Preference, 105, 104785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2022.104785
Mallillin, W., Dayao, A., Camacho, K., Cabiles, A. J., Calibuso, C. K., Sibbaluca, E., & Alfiler, C. (2025). Microbial analysis and sensory acceptability of squash donuts. Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6(2).
Nazaro, K. C., Dante, D. J. F., Dela Cruz, J. A. C., Eucogco, L. A. B., Fuerte, D. M. G., Peralta, J. C., Alfiler, C. T., & Sinco, M. A. A. (2025). Utilizing orange-fleshed sweet potato loaf bread: A study on sensory, nutrition, and consumer acceptance. Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6(2).
Nuñez, M. G., Olivar, G. M. C., Terana, C. C., & Mutya, R. C. (2025). Sensory attributes and acceptability of taro (Colocasia esculenta) root kropek. Journal of Applied and Natural Science, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.31018/jans.v17i3.6657
Peña, J., Perez, L., Gomez, R., & Sanchez, M. (2021). Optimization of vegetable puree inclusion in donut recipes. Journal of Food Quality, 44(6), 355–367.
Rodrigues, S. S. Q., Dias, L. G., & Teixeira, A. (2024). Emerging methods for the evaluation of sensory quality of food: Technology at service. Current Food Science and Technology Reports, 2, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43555-024-00019-7
Stone, H., Bleibaum, R., & Thomas, H. A. (2020). Sensory evaluation practices (5th ed.). Academic Press.
Sweeney, E., Collins, H., & O'Brien, N. (2022). Consumer perceptions of vegetable-based ingredients in traditional baked goods. Food Quality and Preference, 93, 104317.
Telan, J., Barnedo, M. R. P., Gonzalez, L. M. P., Maranion, L. A. C., Pascual, E. C., Ponce, C., Alfiler, C. T., & Natividad, C. B. (2025). Development of a food wrapper using water spinach leaves (Ipomoea aquatica) as a substitute raw material for nori seaweed sheet. Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6(2).
Villar, M. (2025). Product development from squash (Cucurbita maxima) and nutritional analysis of the processed products including shelf-life evaluation. IRODEO Conference Proceedings, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.63798/b4evp279
Vista, A., Lumboy, C. E., Tabay, G. G. C., Taso, N. A. Y., Tumanguil, I. J., Uday, S. B., Alfiler, C. T., & Tejada, T. A. R. (2025). Nutrient-enriched kropek: A malunggay-alugbati acceptability, sensory evaluation, and nutritional analysis. Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences, 6(2).
Yver, C., Della Valle, G., & Jury, V. (2021). Modeling domestic pancake cooking incorporating the rheological properties of the batter: Application to seven batter recipes. Journal of Food Engineering, 291, 110261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2020.110261
Zare, F., Boye, J. I., & Orsat, V. (2020). Acceptance of functional bakery products: Role of sensory attributes and health perceptions. Journal of Food Science, 84(3), 543–551.
Zhang, X., Wang, L., & Liu, Y. (2021). Consumer preferences for color and flavor of vegetable-based baked goods. International Journal of Food Design, 6(1), 29–39.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.