Building Trusting Relationships Among Teachers, Learners, and Families: Towards Harmonious Collaboration Among School Stakeholders

Authors

  • Kelly June G. Manuel Western Colleges, Inc., Naic, Cavite Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21543848

Keywords:

teacher–learner trust, family engagement, collegial trust, school collaboration, inclusive education, stakeholder relationships

Abstract

This study examined trusting relationships among teachers, learners, families, and fellow teachers as a basis for harmonious collaboration among school stakeholders. A quantitative descriptive-comparative-correlational design was employed among 66 public elementary and secondary school teachers from the Schools Division Office of Antipolo City who were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of .943. Frequency, percentage, weighted mean, standard deviation, independent-samples t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Scheffé post hoc analysis, and Pearson product-moment correlation were used. Trusting relationships were rated Highly Built for teachers to families (M = 3.69, SD = .33), teachers to teachers (M = 3.66, SD = .37), and teachers to learners (M = 3.60, SD = .31). Strong practices included establishing relationships with learners, maintaining open communication with families, and welcoming students by name. Lower-rated practices involved deliberate ignoring as a behavior-management strategy, collaboration on individualized plans, and connecting every learner with a supportive adult. Teacher–learner trust differed significantly by educational attainment (F = 3.142, p = .031), while seminar participation produced significant differences in all three relational domains (p ≤ .009). Age, sex, length of service, and position or rank generally showed no significant differences. The three trust domains were strongly and positively correlated (r = .796–.863, p < .001). The findings indicate that relational trust functions as an interconnected school capacity and support continuous professional development, structured family collaboration, collegial mentoring, and school-wide communication systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Australian Education Research Organisation. (2023). Encouraging a sense of belonging and connectedness in secondary schools. https://www.edresearch.edu.au/resources/encouraging-sense-belonging-and-connectedness-secondary-schools

Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership. (2021). Classroom management: Standards-aligned evidence-based approaches. https://www.aitsl.edu.au/research/spotlights/classroom-management-standards-aligned-evidence-based-approaches

Bennett, T. (2020). Running the room: The teacher’s guide to behaviour. John Catt Educational.

Brezicha, K. F., & Fuller, E. J. (2019). Building teachers’ trust in principals: Exploring the effects of the match between teacher and principal race/ethnicity and gender and feelings of trust. Journal of School Leadership, 29(1), 25–53.

Cobb, F., & Krownapple, J. (2019). Belonging through a culture of dignity: The keys to successful equity implementation. Mimi & Todd Press.

Cook, C. R., Fiat, A., Larson, M., Daikos, C., Slemrod, T., Holland, E. A., Thayer, A. J., & Renshaw, T. (2018). Positive greetings at the door: Evaluation of a low-cost, high-yield proactive classroom management strategy. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 149–159.

De Nobile, J., Lyons, G., & Arthur-Kelly, M. (2021). Positive learning environments: Creating and maintaining productive classrooms. Cengage.

Education Endowment Foundation. (2021). Six recommendations for improving behaviour in schools. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/education-evidence/guidance-reports/behaviour

Goss, P., Sonnemann, J., & Griffiths, K. (2017). Engaging students: Creating classrooms that improve learning. Grattan Institute. https://grattan.edu.au/report/engaging-students-creating-classrooms-that-improve-learning/

Hammond, Z. (2015). Culturally responsive teaching and the brain: Promoting authentic engagement and rigor among culturally and linguistically diverse students. Corwin.

Healey, K., & Stroman, C. (2021). Structures for belonging: A synthesis of research on belonging-supportive learning environments. Student Experience Research Network. https://studentexperiencenetwork.org/research_library/structures-for-belonging-a-synthesis-of-research-on-belonging-supportive-learning-environments/

Hepburn, L., & Beamish, W. (2020). Influences on proactive classroom management: Views of teachers in government secondary schools, Queensland. Improving Schools, 23(1), 33–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480219886148

Kasun, G. S. (2013). Structured spaces of play in a southwestern U.S. urban elementary classroom: Dialectics of community and academic rigor. Taboo: The Journal of Culture & Education, 13(1), 46–62.

Ladson-Billings, G. (2014). Culturally relevant pedagogy 2.0: AKA the remix. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 70–84. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.1.p2rj131485484751

Lemov, D. (2021). Teach like a champion 3.0: 63 techniques that put students on the path to college. Jossey-Bass.

McDonald, T. (2019). Classroom management: Engaging students in learning. Oxford University Press.

Miller, L., & Steele, C. (2021). Teaching and learning: There is no one right way, but there are right things to do. In M. Shay & R. Oliver (Eds.), Indigenous education in Australia: Learning and teaching for deadly futures. Routledge.

Moodie, N., Maxwell, J., & Rudolph, S. (2019). The impact of racism on the schooling experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students: A systematic review. The Australian Educational Researcher, 46(2), 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-019-00312-8

Russell, S., Wentzel, K., & Donlan, A. (2016). Teachers’ beliefs about the development of teacher–adolescent trust. Learning Environments Research, 19(2), 241–266.

Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2015). Teacher interests, mastery goals, and self-efficacy as predictors of instructional practices and student motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 42, 159–171.

Schuitema, J., Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2016). Longitudinal relations between perceived autonomy and social support from teachers, and students’ self-regulated learning and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 49, 32–45.

Shields-Lysiak, L. K., Boyd, M. P., Iorio, J. P., & Vasquez, C. R. (2020). Classroom greetings: More than a simple hello. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(3), 41–56.

Sugita McEown, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2012). Motivational strategies in EFL classrooms: How do teachers impact students’ motivation? Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 20–38.

Tschannen-Moran, M. (2014). Trust matters: Leadership for successful schools (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Gareis, C. R. (2015). Faculty trust in the principal: An essential ingredient in high-performing schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 53(1), 66–92.

Ulmanen, S., Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). Students’ experiences of the development of emotional engagement. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.06.003

Zhang, T., Solmon, M. A., & Gu, X. (2012). The role of teachers’ support in predicting students’ motivation and achievement outcomes in physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31(4), 329–343.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-25

How to Cite

Manuel, K. J. (2026). Building Trusting Relationships Among Teachers, Learners, and Families: Towards Harmonious Collaboration Among School Stakeholders. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(7), 1834-1843. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21543848

Similar Articles

21-30 of 592

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.