Evidence Seeking and Reasoning Growth in Grade 7 Science Inquiry

Authors

  • Judy Ann T. Dalafu Northeastern College Author
  • Alma P. Gonzales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22922668

Keywords:

evidence evaluation, evidence seeking, Grade 7 Science, inquiry learning, scientific reasoning, science education

Abstract

This study investigated how evidence-seeking practices contributed to the growth of scientific reasoning among Grade 7 learners engaged in science inquiry in Tumauini, Isabela. A three-wave prospective longitudinal panel design was employed with 180 Grade 7 learners selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. Data were gathered using an Evidence-Seeking in Science Inquiry Scale and a Scientific Reasoning Performance Measure administered at three points within an academic quarter. Descriptive statistics and bivariate latent change score modeling were used to determine changes in both constructs and to test whether earlier evidence seeking predicted subsequent reasoning growth. Results showed progressive improvement in evidence identification, evaluation, and integration, alongside gains in data interpretation, coordination of claims and evidence, examination of variables, and justification of conclusions. Evidence seeking significantly predicted later increases in scientific reasoning, with a stronger effect observed during the second measurement interval. Concurrent changes in the two constructs were also moderately and positively associated. Despite these gains, learners continued to show difficulty in evaluating evidence quality and providing well-supported scientific conclusions. The findings indicate that evidence seeking functions as an important pathway in the development of scientific reasoning during Grade 7 inquiry. Science instruction should therefore provide sustained opportunities for learners to compare evidence, assess its relevance and adequacy, and defend conclusions through explicit reasoning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allchin, D., & Zemplén, G. Á. (2020). Finding the place of argumentation in science education: Epistemics and whole science. Science Education, 104(5), 907–933.

Bezci, F., & Sungur, S. (2021). How is middle school students’ scientific reasoning ability associated with gender and learning environment? Science Education International, 32(2), 96–106.

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum: Science, Grades 4 and 7. Department of Education.

Duncan, R. G., Chinn, C. A., & Barzilai, S. (2018). Grasp of evidence: Problematizing and expanding the Next Generation Science Standards' conceptualization of evidence. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(7), 907–937.

González-Howard, M., & McNeill, K. L. (2020). Acting with epistemic agency: Characterizing student critique during argumentation discussions. Science Education, 104(6), 953–982.

Lee, S. W.-Y., Luan, H., Lee, M.-H., Chang, H.-Y., Liang, J.-C., Lee, Y.-H., Lin, T.-J., Wu, A.-H., Chiu, Y.-J., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). Measuring epistemologies in science learning and teaching: A systematic review of the literature. Science Education, 105(5), 880–907.

Leung, J. S. C. (2020). Students' adherences to epistemic understanding in evaluating scientific claims. Science Education, 104(2), 164–192.

Manz, E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2020). Rethinking the classroom science investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(7), 1148–1174.

Nussbaum, E. M., Van Winkle, M. S., Tian, L., Putney, L. G., Huerta, M., Perera, H. N., Dove, I. J., Herrera, A. N., & Carroll, K. R. (2024). Extending science instruction beyond the CER: Use of critical questions in the argumentation of middle school science students. Science Education, 108(5), 1420–1447.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volumes I and II): Country notes, Philippines. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2026). PISA 2025 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: A comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education, 51(Suppl. 2), 595–616.

Reith, M., & Nehring, A. (2020). Scientific reasoning and views on the nature of scientific inquiry: Testing a new framework to understand and model epistemic cognition in science. International Journal of Science Education, 42(16), 2716–2741.

Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Härtig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: The influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1812–1831.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Dalafu, J. A., & Gonzales, A. (2026). Evidence Seeking and Reasoning Growth in Grade 7 Science Inquiry. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 1738-1746. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22922668

Similar Articles

1-10 of 773

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.