Future-Ready Social Studies Pedagogy and Civic Learning Engagement in Secondary Education

Authors

  • Esbiert A. Baluga Northeastern College Author
  • Genesis N. Damaso Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22935959

Keywords:

Araling Panlipunan, civic agency, civic learning engagement, digital civic literacy, future-ready pedagogy, secondary education

Abstract

This study explored the contribution of future-ready Social Studies pedagogy to civic learning engagement among secondary learners in Tabuk City, Kalinga. A matched classroom cross-source design involved 30 Araling Panlipunan teachers and 90 secondary learners. Two complementary instruments measured five dimensions of future-ready pedagogy and four dimensions of civic learning engagement. Descriptive statistics, Spearman’s rank-order correlation with 5,000 bias-corrected and accelerated bootstrap resamples, and bootstrap multiple regression were applied to the matched teacher-classroom data. Results showed that future-ready Social Studies pedagogy was generally high, with inquiry and evidence use obtaining the strongest rating, while digital civic literacy remained moderate. Learners likewise demonstrated high overall civic learning engagement, particularly in civic attentiveness and critical civic judgment, although civic agency was only moderate. Overall future-ready pedagogy was strongly and positively associated with civic learning engagement. Learner agency support, inquiry and evidence use, and deliberative learning significantly predicted learner engagement, whereas digital civic literacy did not show a significant independent contribution. The findings suggest that civic engagement was stronger in classrooms where learners examined evidence, discussed social issues, expressed reasoned positions, and exercised meaningful participation. Strengthening digital civic literacy and creating more opportunities for authentic civic action may further improve future-ready Araling Panlipunan instruction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asia Society, & Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Teaching for global competence in a rapidly changing world. OECD Publishing.

Blevins, B., LeCompte, K., & Wells, S. (2016). Innovations in civic education: Developing civic agency through action civics. Theory & Research in Social Education, 44(3), 344–384.

Boulianne, S., & Theocharis, Y. (2020). Young people, digital media, and engagement: A meta-analysis of research. Social Science Computer Review, 38(2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318814190

Bowyer, B., & Kahne, J. (2020). The digital dimensions of civic education: Assessing the effects of learning opportunities. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 69, 101162.

de Guzman, A. B., de Castro, B., & Adamos, J. L. (2024). Locating Filipino social studies teachers' preferred positionality, reasons, and practices in the teaching of controversial public issues. Journal of Education for Teaching, 50(1), 20–32.

Department of Education. (2017). K to 12 curriculum guide: Araling Panlipunan. Learning Resources Management and Development System.

LeCompte, K., Blevins, B., & Riggers-Piehl, T. (2020). Developing civic competence through action civics: A longitudinal look at the data. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2019.03.002

Maddox, L. E., Howell, J. B., & Saye, J. W. (2018). Designing geographic inquiry: Preparing secondary students for citizenship. Journal of Geography, 117(6), 254–268.

McGrew, S., Breakstone, J., Ortega, T., Smith, M., & Wineburg, S. (2018). Can students evaluate online sources? Learning from assessments of civic online reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education, 46(2), 165–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2017.1416320

Saye, J. W., Stoddard, J., Gerwin, D. M., Libresco, A. S., & Maddox, L. E. (2018). Authentic pedagogy: Examining intellectual challenge in social studies classrooms. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 50(6), 865–884.

Schulz, W., Fraillon, J., Losito, B., Agrusti, G., Ainley, J., & Damiani, V. (2024). Education for citizenship in times of global challenge: IEA International Civic and Citizenship Education Study 2022 international report. Springer.

Siegel-Stechler, K. (2021). Teaching for citizenship: Instructional practices and open classroom climate. Theory & Research in Social Education, 49(4), 570–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2021.1966560

Teegelbeckers, J. Y., Nieuwelink, H., & Oostdam, R. J. (2023). School-based teaching for democracy: A systematic review of teaching methods in quantitative intervention studies. Educational Research Review, 39, 100511.

Thacker, E. S., Lee, J. K., Fitchett, P. G., & Journell, W. (2018). Secondary social studies teachers' experiences planning and implementing inquiry using the Inquiry Design Model. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 91(4–5), 193–200.

Yoshino, K. (2023). Active citizens' formation through social studies pedagogical practices: Perspectives of teachers and learners from selected secondary schools in Malawi. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(8), 1402–1419.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

A. Baluga, E., & N. Damaso, G. (2026). Future-Ready Social Studies Pedagogy and Civic Learning Engagement in Secondary Education. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 1960-1968. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22935959

Similar Articles

61-70 of 812

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.