Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan Implementation and School Head Responses in the Division of Masbate

Authors

  • Uzikiel V. Altarejos College of Advanced Studies, Philippine Normal University, Manila, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23017873

Keywords:

BE-LCP, learning continuity, school heads, educational resilience, PPSSH, crisis leadership

Abstract

This qualitative-descriptive study examined the implementation of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) and the responses of school heads to disruption-related challenges in the Schools Division of Masbate, with the findings used to develop an enhancement plan supporting the transition to the Learning Service Continuity Plan (LSCP). Twenty public schools representing elementary, secondary, and integrated school types across the three congressional districts of Masbate were purposively selected. Data were gathered from four stakeholder groups—school heads, teachers, learners, and parents/community partners—through in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, structured reflection, and documentary analysis of school BE-LCP documents. Directed content analysis was guided by the BE-LCP policy framework and the five domains of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads (PPSSH), with inductive coding used for emerging themes. Data-source triangulation, reflexive journaling, expert validation, and pilot testing supported trustworthiness. Thirteen themes emerged across the research questions. All twenty schools were still using pandemic-era BE-LCPs undergoing revision in response to DepEd Order No. 022, s. 2024. Printed Modular Distance Learning remained the dominant continuity modality, while recurring challenges involved abrupt class suspensions, unavailable pre-positioned learning materials, poor connectivity, limited multimedia resources, weak home-based learning support, and incomplete learner outputs. School heads responded through proactive materials preparation, contextualized learning activity sheets, catch-up instruction, communication networks, and resource mobilization. Stakeholders consistently recognized resource management, communication, and trust-building as strengths, while instructional coaching, monitoring and evaluation, and learning-recovery leadership remained growth areas. A five-focus Enhancement Plan was developed covering crisis management and LSCP development, instructional continuity and materials preparedness, monitoring and feedback systems, stakeholder partnerships, and learning-recovery and assessment leadership.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Capacio, J., Mabunga, R., & Manaois, J. (2021). Challenges encountered in the implementation of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) amidst the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Advanced Research and Publications, 5(4), 65–73.

Castroverde, F., & Acala, M. (2022). Teachers’ experience in the implementation of Modular Distance Learning. American Journal of Humanities and Social Research.

Department of Education. (2020a). DepEd Order No. 012, s. 2020: Adoption of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan for School Year 2020–2021 in light of the COVID-19 public health emergency. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Department of Education. (2020b). DepEd Order No. 024, s. 2020: National adoption and implementation of the Philippine Professional Standards for School Heads. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 022, s. 2024: Revised guidelines on class and work suspension in schools during disasters and emergencies. Department of Education, Republic of the Philippines.

Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22.

Donnelly, R., & Patrinos, H. A. (2021). Learning loss during COVID-19: An early systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10534-7

Doyle, L., McCabe, C., Keogh, B., Brady, A., & McCann, M. (2020). An overview of the qualitative descriptive design within nursing research. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(5), 443–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927204

Epstein, J. L. (2018). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools (2nd ed.). Westview Press.

Goodall, J. (2021). Parental engagement and deficit discourses: Absolving the system and solving parents. Educational Review, 73(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1559801

Gottfried, M. A., & Dee, T. S. (2022). The pandemic and educational opportunity. The Future of Children, 32(1), 3–26.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the principal's contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/0924345980090203

Harris, A., & Jones, M. (2020). COVID-19 and school leadership: Hard choices and uncertain times. School Leadership & Management, 40(5), 321–330.

Henderson, N., & Milstein, M. M. (2003). Resiliency in schools: Making it happen for students and educators. Corwin Press.

Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687

Inter-Agency Network for Education in Emergencies. (2010). INEE minimum standards for education: Preparedness, response, recovery. INEE.

Landa, L., Calderon, M., & Limjap, A. (2021). Filipino teachers' experiences in distance learning modalities during COVID-19: Challenges and coping mechanisms. Journal of Research in Educational Sciences, 12(8), 4–17.

Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077

Macasaet, J. C., & Polancos, D. T. (2022). School heads' performance under the PPSSH during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study. Philippine Journal of Educational Research and Reviews, 1(1), 1–18.

Narag, R. N., & Macabago, L. S. (2021). BE-LCP in Mindanao: ICT constraints, teacher readiness, and community response. Philippine Social Science Journal, 4(3), 87–98.

Olivar, M. J. A., & Naparan, G. B. (2023). Parental involvement and academic performance of students in online class learning modality. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v10i2p16

Reimers, F. M., & Schleicher, A. (2020). A framework to guide an education response to the COVID-19 pandemic of 2020. OECD Publishing.

Reyes, P. C., Soriano, H. T., & Lagman, A. C. (2023). Localization of the BE-LCP: School-based adaptations and their effects on learner engagement and parental participation. Philippine Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 7(1), 55–72.

Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G

SEAMEO INNOTECH. (2021). Education in emergencies in Southeast Asia: Regional framework and country practices. Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization.

Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.

Sumalinog, G. G., & Delen, I. (2022). Resilience of public schools in disaster-prone communities in Mindanao: Leadership, partnerships, and contingency planning. Disaster Prevention and Management, 31(5), 611–628.

UNESCO. (2022). Recovering education in 2022. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

How to Cite

Altarejos, U. (2026). Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan Implementation and School Head Responses in the Division of Masbate. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 2349-2359. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23017873

Similar Articles

11-20 of 836

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.