Exploring the Lived Experiences of Senior High School Science Teachers in Advancing Scientific Literacy and Classroom Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24008563Keywords:
scientific literacy, classroom innovation, descriptive phenomenology, senior high school science teachers, instructional agency, Colaizzi’s methodAbstract
This study described the lived experiences of senior high school science teachers in selected public schools in Manila City, Philippines, as they advanced scientific literacy and classroom innovation under actual classroom conditions. It examined how teachers made science relevant, supported inquiry and evidence-based reasoning, adapted instruction to learner needs, and responded to limitations in resources, facilities, time, and technology. A qualitative Husserlian descriptive phenomenological design was used. Twelve senior high school science teachers, with 15 to 34 years of science teaching experience, were selected through purposive criterion sampling and took part in semi-structured phenomenological interviews; their validated transcripts or response summaries formed the data corpus. Colaizzi’s descriptive phenomenological method guided the identification of significant statements, formulation of meanings, clustering of themes, development of essential themes, and synthesis of the essential structure of the experience. Scientific literacy was experienced as active engagement in questioning, investigation, evidence interpretation, claim evaluation, and application of science to real-life concerns, while classroom innovation was experienced as adaptive, learner-centered practice rather than a single teaching method. Five essential themes emerged: science became meaningful when connected with learners’ lived realities and real-world concerns; scientific literacy developed through inquiry, evidence, and critical judgment; classroom innovation was adaptive and learner-centered; resource constraints reshaped science teaching and required continuous adaptation; and advancing scientific literacy changed the teacher’s role while expanding learner ownership. The study concludes that scientific literacy and classroom innovation are experienced together, because instructional adaptation allows teachers to sustain relevance, inquiry, evidence use, and learner participation when ordinary conditions are insufficient. Based on these findings, a six-component Science Literacy and Classroom Innovation Support Framework for Senior High School Science Teachers was proposed, with implications for instructional support, laboratories and resources, sustained professional learning, collaboration, and flexible school-level conditions.
Downloads
References
Abrantes, L. F., & Bargamento, A. L. (2024). Lived experiences of out-of-field senior high school teachers teaching Physical Science. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Educational Research and Innovation, 2(1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.17613/r5pt-t937
Adler, I., & Akad, I. (2024). New roles for science teachers: A cultural-historical activity theory intervention to support education for health, wellbeing, and citizenship. Teaching and Teacher Education, 145, Article 104635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104635
Agpawan-Acyapat, A. (2026). Between experiments and expectations: A phenomenological study on the lived experiences, challenges, and coping strategies of science teachers in the Philippines. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 3(1), 277–288. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v3i1.1816
Aguas, P. P. (2022). Fusing approaches in educational research: Data collection and data analysis in phenomenological research. The Qualitative Report, 27(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5027
Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A. S., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 920317. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
Almutairi, S. S., & Alangari, T. S. (2025). Teaching practices of middle school science teachers in light of the PISA 2025 test competencies. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, Article e2025489. https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2025.18.489
Ambroce, J. J. D., & Daza, S. D. (2025). Lived experiences of out-of-field public school science teachers: A qualitative research. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 36(10), 1172–1200. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.361010
Amemasor, S. K., Oppong, S. O., Ghansah, B., Benuwa, B.-B., & Essel, D. D. (2025). A systematic review on the impact of teacher professional development on digital instructional integration and teaching practices. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1541031. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1541031
Amoroso, E. J. B. T., Llanos, J. C., Saro, J. M., Rabara, L. L., Sawate, V. T., & Belluga, C. F. M. (2022). The lived experiences of junior high school science teachers amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: An inquiry-based learning. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 5(1), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7325357
Bayot, M. F. (2024). Teachers’ lived experiences in teaching science during the pandemic. Ignatian International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 2(4), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10908085
Bossér, U. (2024). Transformation of school science practices to promote functional scientific literacy. Research in Science Education, 54, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-023-10138-1
Bustamante, M. F. O. (2025). Effectiveness of professional development programs on science teachers’ literacy in basic education. American Journal of Education and Technology, 4(2), 114–128. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v4i2.4411
Candelario, C. M. B., & Abo, C. P. (2025). Out-of-field teaching experiences of science teachers in non-specialized subjects: A phenomenological study. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 40(3), 388–406. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.400306
Confesor, R. F., & Belmi, R. M. (2022). Structure, activities and teacher development in the Philippine science teachers’ community of practice. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 71–89. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.6.5
Cortes, S. T., Lorca, A. S., Pineda, H. A., Tubog, R., & Vilbar, A. (2024). Strengthening science education in basic education through a professional development program on participatory action research for science teachers. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 101194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101194
Department of Education. (2019, August 22). Policy guidelines on the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 21, s. 2019). https://www.deped.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/DO_s2019_021.pdf
Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S., Harrold, A., Gibas, M., Long, A., & Shultz, G. V. (2026). Teacher agency during a K-12 place-based collaborative design process centered around a socio-scientific issue in Northern Alaska. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 8, Article 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-026-00160-4
Fujii, H., & Lee, S.-K. (Eds.). (2024). Science education for sustainable development in Asia. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-8711-5
Holincheck, N. M., & Galanti, T. M. (2026). STEM teacher identity and agency: A cross-case analysis of four teachers’ actions for equity in STEM. Journal for STEM Education Research, 9, 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-025-00163-2
Istyadji, M., & Sauqina. (2023). Conception of scientific literacy in the development of scientific literacy assessment tools: A systematic theoretical review. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 20(2), 281–308. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2023.016
Karousiou, C., & Evagorou, M. (2026). Perspectives of teachers on integrating AI tools in science education. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1738401. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1738401
Klemenčič, E., Ploj Virtič, M., & Majer Kovačič, J. (2023). The role of teacher education in the science literacy development. Athens Journal of Education, 10(4), 647–668. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-4-5
Kumar, V., Choudhary, S. K., & Singh, R. (2024). Environmental socio-scientific issues as contexts in developing scientific literacy in science education: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, Article 100765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100765
Mislang, R. D. L. (2025). Proposed evaluation tools assessing learning engagement of Grade 6 learners in science: Basis for learning framework. International Journal of Novel Research and Development, 10(3), a727–a738. https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2503095.pdf
Monta, E. R., & Perdio, A. C. (2025). Laboratory-based science instruction in public schools: Insights from teachers’ experiences and implications for contextualized interventions in Bataan, Philippines. EPRA International Journal of Research & Development, 10(6), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra22103
Ogegbo, A. A., Ramnarain, U., & Krajcik, J. (2024). Factors predicting teachers’ implementation of inquiry-based teaching practices: Analysis of South African TIMSS 2019 data from an ecological perspective. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(9), 2069–2103. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21943
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volumes I and II): Country notes: Philippines. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-results-volume-i-and-ii-country-notes_ed6fbcc5-en/philippines_a0882a2d-en.html
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). PISA 2025 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/86c36975-en
Pandoy, L. K. L., Diaz, Z. O. M. H., Salem, K. J. G., Damaso, J. M., Cabaylo, R. M., & Abo, C. P. (2022). Science teachers’ lived experiences and challenges during the COVID-19 pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science, 2(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijotis.v2i2.49554
Park, J., Teo, T. W., Teo, A., Chang, J., Huang, J. S., & Koo, S. (2023). Integrating artificial intelligence into science lessons: Teachers’ experiences and views. International Journal of STEM Education, 10, Article 61. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00454-3
Posion, D. P. (2025). Lived experiences of untrained-beginning multi-grade teachers in teaching science in remote schools in Burauen Leyte, Philippines. Journal of Education, Learning, and Management, 2(1), 256–268. https://doi.org/10.69739/jelm.v2i1.678
Priestley, M., Biesta, G., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474219426
Republic Act No. 10533. (2013). Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2013/ra_10533_2013.html
Republic Act No. 11293. (2019). Philippine Innovation Act. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2019/ra_11293_2019.html
Republic Act No. 9512. (2008). National Environmental Awareness and Education Act of 2008. https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2008/ra_9512_2008.html
Saija, M., Rahayu, S., Fajaroh, F., & Sumari. (2022). Enhancement of high school students’ scientific literacy using local-socioscientific issues in OE3C instructional strategies. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.33341
San Luis, J. C., & Villafranca, M. R. (2022). Looking through the lens of rural science teachers in the new normal setting. International Journal of Educational Management and Development Studies, 3(1), 74–96. https://doi.org/10.53378/352864
Schools Division Office of Manila. (n.d.). About. https://www.depedmanila.ph/about
Tytler, R. W., Monroe, M. C., Eames, C., & White, P. J. (2025). Expanding the scope of science education to engage with Anthropocene challenges. Research in Science Education, 55, 1129–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10276-8
Urdanivia Alarcon, D. A., Talavera-Mendoza, F., Rucano Paucar, F. H., Cayani Caceres, K. S., & Machaca Viza, R. (2023). Science and inquiry-based teaching and learning: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1170487. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1170487
Valdés-Sánchez, V., & Gutiérrez-Esteban, P. (2023). Challenges and enablers in the advancement of educational innovation: The forces at work in the transformation of education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, Article 104359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104359
Walag, A. M. P., Fajardo, M. T. M., Bacarrisas, P. G., & Guimary, F. M. (2022). A canonical correlation analysis of Filipino science teachers’ scientific literacy and science teaching efficacy. International Journal of Instruction, 15(3), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15314a
White, P. J., Ardoin, N. M., Eames, C., & Monroe, M. C. (2023). Agency in the Anthropocene: Supporting document to the PISA 2025 Science Framework (OECD Education Working Papers No. 297). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/8d3b6cfa-en
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
