Roadmap and Lenses for Special Science Curriculum Program Implementation in a Schools Division
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24047426Keywords:
special science curriculum program, curriculum implementation, contextualized policy, shared leadership, resource constraints, continuous improvementAbstract
This study assessed the implementation of the Special Science Curriculum Program (SCP) in the Schools Division of Marinduque, Philippines, an island province classified as a geographically isolated and disadvantaged area, examined the experiences of its implementers, and developed a contextualized policy manual to strengthen program delivery. A mixed-methods design was employed. Fifty-four internal stakeholders (nine school principals, nine SCP coordinators, and 36 key science teachers) from the nine SCP-implementing secondary schools were purposively selected to answer a validated 50-item survey questionnaire (Cronbach’s α = .974) covering leadership and governance, curriculum and instruction, accountability, continuous improvement, and monitoring and evaluation. Nine participants from three purposively selected schools took part in school-based triad focus group discussions (FGDs). Survey data were analyzed using frequency counts and medians, FGD data through thematic analysis supported by document analysis, and expert validation ratings of the manual using means. SCP implementation was generally evident across all five domains (overall Mdn = 4), but medium schools obtained lower medians (Mdn = 2–3), particularly in vision-setting and planning, learning resources and facilities, research engagement, partnerships, tracer studies, and contextualized monitoring tools. Implementers reported opportunities in shared leadership, instructional practice and academic excellence, accountability and professional growth, and partnership-driven improvement, while factors and issues included limited specialized training, difficulties in scaffolding enriched content, weak monitoring tools and partnerships, governance instability, resource constraints, and teacher and learner workload pressures. The contextualized SCP Policy Manual was rated highly adequate (M = 4.6). The study concludes that SCP implementation is generally effective but not yet fully institutionalized, and that strengthening governance continuity, resources, teacher support, and monitoring systems is necessary for sustained and equitable improvement.
Downloads
References
Barrett, P., Treves, A., Shmis, T., Ambasz, D., & Ustinova, M. (2019). The impact of school infrastructure on learning: A synthesis of the evidence. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1378-8
Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149
Camara, J. S. (2018). Spirally progressive and contextualized research curriculum competency checklists for the Philippine special science program. Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Studies, 1(3).
Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X16631750
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-report
Datnow, A. (2020). The role of teachers in educational reform: A 20-year perspective. Journal of Educational Change, 21(3), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09372-5
Department of Education. (2005). Instituting measures to increase engaged time-on-task and ensuring compliance therewith (DepEd Order No. 9, s. 2005).
Department of Education. (2012). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the special curricular programs at the secondary level (DepEd Order No. 46, s. 2012).
Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015).
Department of Education. (2020). Interim guidelines for assessment and grading in light of the Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (DepEd Order No. 31, s. 2020).
Donohoo, J., Hattie, J., & Eells, R. (2018). The power of collective efficacy. Educational Leadership, 75(6), 40–44.
Fullan, M. (2016). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press.
Gatchalian, S. (2025). Fixing the foundations: A matter of national survival [Press release]. Second Congressional Commission on Education.
Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2020). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes (5th ed.). Pearson.
Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143216670652
Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. T. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin.
Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2018). Eight important things to know about the experiential learning cycle. Australian Educational Leader, 40(3), 8–14.
Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
Lincallo, M. G. (2025). A proposed instructional supervision: The Bila-Bila model [Unpublished manuscript]. College of Advanced Studies, Philippine Normal University.
Madigan, D. J., & Curran, T. (2021). Does burnout affect academic achievement? A meta-analysis of over 100,000 students. Educational Psychology Review, 33(2), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-020-09533-1
Mangarin, R. A., & Macayana, L. B. (2024). Why schools lack laboratory and equipment in science? Through the lense of research studies. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 8(10), 2835–2840. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8100238
Means, B., Wang, H., Wei, X., Young, V., & Iwatani, E. (2021). Impacts of attending an inclusive STEM high school: Meta-analytic estimates from five studies. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00260-1
Nicdao, M. F., & Ancho, I. V. (2020). Practices of the stakeholders’ involvement in the formulation of school improvement plan. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 20(1), 219–246. https://doi.org/10.14456/hasss.2020.9
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5f07c754-en
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en
Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues (7th ed.). Pearson.
Ortega, J. M., & Chua, E. N. (2024). Strategic impact assessment of revitalized science, technology and engineering program. International Journal of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics, 4(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.53378/353028
Pascoe, M. C., Hetrick, S. E., & Parker, A. G. (2020). The impact of stress on students in secondary school and higher education. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 25(1), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673843.2019.1596823
Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481
Prado, G., & Sabas, H. (2023). Implementation of special science elementary school curriculum as correlate of school performance and instructional leadership: Basis for continuous improvement plan. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 13(6), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8354066
Schildkamp, K. (2019). Data-based decision-making for school improvement: Research insights and gaps. Educational Research, 61(3), 257–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2019.1625716
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006
Stoll, L., & Kools, M. (2017). The school as a learning organisation: A review revisiting and extending a timely concept. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 2(1), 2–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-09-2016-0022
Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020
Tian, M., Risku, M., & Collin, K. (2016). A meta-analysis of distributed leadership from 2002 to 2013: Theory development, empirical evidence and future research focus. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(1), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214558576
Toledo, R. P. (2024). Extent of implementation of Special Science Curriculum (SSC) in public secondary schools in the Division of Rizal, Philippines. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 5(12), 5322–5336. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1440907.pdf
UNESCO. (2021). Reimagining our futures together: A new social contract for education. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/ASRB4722
Vangrieken, K., Meredith, C., Packer, T., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Teacher communities as a context for professional development: A systematic review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 47–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.001
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
