Improving Academic Performance in Introduction to World Religion and Belief System Through Project-Based Learning (PBL) Among Grade 11 Students of Lunas National High School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24128691Keywords:
project-based learning, world religions and belief systems, academic performance, senior high school, HUMSS, mixed methodsAbstract
This study determined the effectiveness of Project-Based Learning (PBL) in improving the academic performance of Grade 11 Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS) students in Introduction to World Religions and Belief Systems at Lunas National High School, Maasin City Division, Southern Leyte, during School Year 2025–2026, and used the results as the basis for a PBL-based instructional guide. A mixed-methods design was employed, combining a one-group pretest–posttest pre-experimental design with a focus group discussion (FGD). The participants were the 20 Grade 11 HUMSS students of the school, who also took part in the FGD. Performance in three learning competencies was measured using a validated 30-item researcher-made achievement test aligned with the assessment guidelines of DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, and the paired-samples t-test, while FGD data were analyzed through thematic analysis. Students’ overall performance rose from Fairly Satisfactory in the pretest (M = 3.55, SD = 1.35) to Very Satisfactory in the posttest (M = 7.51, SD = 0.85), with significant pretest–posttest differences in all three competencies (p < .05). Three themes emerged from the FGD: transformative learning and critical awareness, empowered and collaborative learning, and authentic application and personal growth. The findings indicate that PBL was associated with higher posttest scores, improved competency mastery, and more engaging and collaborative learning experiences. Because a one-group pretest–posttest design was used, the improvement cannot be attributed solely to the intervention; nevertheless, the results provide preliminary evidence that PBL is a promising instructional approach for teaching world religions in senior high school.
Downloads
References
American Association of School Librarians. (2018). National school library standards for learners, school librarians, and school libraries. ALA Editions.
Barak, M., & Dori, Y. J. (2005). Enhancing undergraduate students’ chemistry understanding through project-based learning in an IT environment. Science Education, 89(1), 117–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20027
Bell, S. (2010). Project-based learning for the 21st century: Skills for the future. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 83(2), 39–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098650903505415
Boaler, J. (2019). Limitless mind: Learn, lead, and live without barriers. HarperOne.
Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (Eds.). (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school (Expanded ed.). National Academy Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/9853
Chen, C.-H., & Yang, Y.-C. (2019). Revisiting the effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement: A meta-analysis investigating moderators. Educational Research Review, 26, 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2018.11.001
Department of Education. (2015). Policy guidelines on classroom assessment for the K to 12 Basic Education Program (DepEd Order No. 8, s. 2015).
Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide: Senior High School – Humanities and Social Sciences (HUMSS). https://www.deped.gov.ph/k-to-12/curriculum-guides/
Department of Education. (2024). Policy guidelines on the implementation of the MATATAG curriculum (DepEd Order No. 10, s. 2024).
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS Statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Grant, M. M. (2011). Learning, beliefs, and products: Students’ perspectives with project-based learning. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(2), 37–69. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1254
Han, S., Capraro, R., & Capraro, M. M. (2015). How science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) project-based learning (PBL) affects high, middle, and low achievers differently: The impact of student factors on achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 1089–1113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Helle, L., Tynjälä, P., & Olkinuora, E. (2006). Project-based learning in post-secondary education: Theory, practice and rubber sling shots. Higher Education, 51(2), 287–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-004-6386-5
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Holmes, V.-L., & Hwang, Y. (2016). Exploring the effects of project-based learning in secondary mathematics education. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(5), 449–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.979911
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Krajcik, J. S., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (2006). Project-based learning. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–334). Cambridge University Press.
Larmer, J., Mergendoller, J., & Boss, S. (2015). Setting the standard for project-based learning: A proven approach to rigorous classroom instruction. ASCD.
Manglik, R. (2024). Human development. EduGorilla Publication.
Perry, W. G., Jr. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2006.tb00884.x
Republic Act No. 10173. (2012). Data Privacy Act of 2012. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines. https://www.officialgazette.gov.ph/2012/08/15/republic-act-no-10173/
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. The Autodesk Foundation.
Tseng, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lou, S.-J., & Chen, W.-P. (2013). Attitudes towards science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) in a project-based learning (PjBL) environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 87–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9160-x
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design (Expanded 2nd ed.). ASCD.
Wineburg, S., & McGrew, S. (2017). Lateral reading: Reading less and learning more when evaluating digital information (Stanford History Education Group Working Paper No. 2017-A1). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3048994
Wurdinger, S., & Rudolph, J. (2009). A different type of success: Teaching important life skills through project-based learning. Improving Schools, 12(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480209105576
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
