Serpent Archetype in Philippine and Thai Mythology: Cross-Cultural Themes and Symbolism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24155529Keywords:
Bakunawa, Nāga, Peircean Semiotics, Social Facts, Cultural Symbolism, Southeast Asian MythologyAbstract
This study explored the socio-semiotic dimensions of the Nāga and the Bakunawa, two significant serpent figures from Thailand and the Philippines, respectively, and investigated how these figures generate meaning and become woven into collective memory, identity, social values, and the relationships among humans, nature, and the sacred. Guided by Charles Sanders Peirce’s Semiotic Theory and Émile Durkheim’s Theory of Social Facts, the study employed a qualitative comparative case study design in Bangkok, Thailand, and Iloilo, Philippines. Data were triangulated from documentary analysis, examination of visual and ritual artifacts, and semi-structured interviews with six purposively selected key informants—three Thai and three Filipino cultural experts, educators, and tradition-bearers. The data were analyzed thematically, through denotative and connotative interpretation, Peirce’s triadic model of representamen, object, and interpretant, Durkheimian sociological interpretation, and cross-case comparison. Five themes emerged: the serpent as guardian and protector, as cosmic regulator, as symbol of cultural identity and collective memory, as mediator between the human and sacred worlds, and as living cultural heritage. The Nāga and the Bakunawa share symbolic ties to water, cosmic forces, cultural memory, and the human relationship with nature, yet their cultural roles diverge: the Nāga acts primarily as an institutionalized guardian of sacred space, moral order, prosperity, and spiritual protection within Thai Buddhist tradition, while the Bakunawa embodies cosmic disruption in Visayan mythology and is being reinterpreted as a symbol of collective action, resilience, ancestral memory, and cultural recovery. The study concludes that both figures operate as living socio-semiotic institutions whose meanings are continually produced, reinforced, and reshaped through rituals, institutions, education, art, and communal practices, with implications for comparative mythology, Southeast Asian studies, and heritage preservation.
Downloads
References
Abuso, G. (2022). Opportunities and challenges in integrating Indigenous peoples and cultural diversity in international studies. In A. Day, L. Lee, D. S. P. Thomas, & J. Spickard (Eds.), Diversity, inclusion, and decolonization: Practical tools for improving teaching, research, and scholarship (pp. 220–235). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529216677.016
Acabado, S. B., & Martin, M. M. (2022). Indigenous archaeology in the Philippines: Decolonizing Ifugao history. University of Arizona Press.
Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.
Assmann, J. (2011). Cultural memory and early civilization: Writing, remembrance, and political imagination. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996306
Bankoff, G. (1999). Devils, familiars and Spaniards: Spheres of power and the supernatural in the world of Seberina Candelaria and her village in early 19th century Philippines. Journal of Social History, 33(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1353/jsh.1999.0003
Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies (A. Lavers, Trans.). Hill and Wang.
Blanco, J. D. (2023). Counter-Hispanization in the colonial Philippines: Literature, law, religion, and native custom. Amsterdam University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9789048556656
Boonsong, B. (2018). Serpents as a symbol representing the characteristics of the God Shiva. Silpakorn University e-Journal (Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts), 38(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.14456/sujthai.2018.15
Cajete, G. A. (2020). Indigenous science, climate change, and Indigenous community building: A framework of foundational perspectives for Indigenous community resilience and revitalization. Sustainability, 12(22), Article 9569. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229569
Campbell, J. (1949). The hero with a thousand faces. Pantheon Books.
Carls, P. (2022). The social fact in Durkheim’s late work: Structural hermeneutics, positive sociology, and causality. Journal of Classical Sociology, 22(2), 222–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468795X20980660
Chandler, D. (2007). Semiotics: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Chang, Y.-L. (2017). Exploring Naga images: Textual analysis of Thailand’s narratives. Journal of Mekong Societies, 13(1), 19–35. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/mekongjournal/article/view/84923
Chang, Y.-L. (2022). Exploring application modes of visual arts: Naga images of Thailand. Asian Journal of Arts and Culture, 22(2), Article 257772. https://doi.org/10.48048/ajac.2022.257772
Chang, Y.-L. (2024). Naga imagery and the impact of the Internet on Naga worship in Thailand. International Journal of Asia Pacific Studies, 20(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.21315/ijaps2024.20.1.2
Chilisa, B., & Kawulich, B. (2012). Selecting a research approach: Paradigm, methodology and methods. In C. Wagner, B. Kawulich, & M. Garner (Eds.), Doing social research: A global context (pp. 51–61). McGraw-Hill.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Della Costa, F. (2023). Ritual as metaphor. Anthropological Theory, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/14634996221130834
Derain, A. N. (2021). The last Bakunawa: Self-translation with notes. Kritika Kultura, 37, 560–580. https://doi.org/10.13185/KK2021.003728
Descola, P. (2013). Beyond nature and culture (J. Lloyd, Trans.). University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 2005)
Douglas, M. (1966). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Durkheim, É. (1982). The rules of sociological method (S. Lukes, Ed.; W. D. Halls, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1895)
Durkheim, É. (1995). The elementary forms of religious life (K. E. Fields, Trans.). Free Press. (Original work published 1912)
Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Indiana University Press.
Eliade, M. (1959). The sacred and the profane: The nature of religion. Harcourt, Brace & World.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11
Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed., pp. 301–316). SAGE Publications.
Gabica, D. G. (2025). Exploring the ethnomathematics in Philippine folklore: The legend of Bakunawa. Ethnomathematics Journal, 6(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.21831/ej.v6i2.88776
Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Harrison, R. (2013). Heritage: Critical approaches. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203108857
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Routledge.
Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. Doubleday.
Klangrit, S., Siripaprapagon, Y., Kankaew, P., & Mingthaisong, P. (2021). Meaningful value of Naga patterns on the religious wrappers of Thai-Khmer people in Surin Province. Asia Paridarsana, 42(1), 1–28. https://so01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/asianreview/article/view/250566
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Malinowski, B. (1926). Myth in primitive psychology. W. W. Norton & Company.
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
McCoy, A. W. (1982). Baylan: Animist religion and Philippine peasant ideology. In D. K. Wyatt & A. Woodside (Eds.), Moral order and the question of change: Essays on Southeast Asian thought (pp. 338–408). Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.
Moonkham, P. (2021). Ethnohistorical archaeology and the mythscape of the Naga in the Chiang Saen Basin, Thailand. TRaNS: Trans-Regional and -National Studies of Southeast Asia, 9(2), 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1017/trn.2021.3
Munsap, P., & Phakdeephasook, S. (2022). Naga worship: The creation of traditions and rituals related to Naga in contemporary Isan. Journal of Arts and Thai Studies, 44(1), 1–19. https://so08.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/artssu/article/view/71
National Commission for Culture and the Arts. (n.d.). Intangible heritage. https://ncca.gov.ph/about-culture-and-arts/culture-profile/intangible-heritage/
Noer, K. A., & Pradnyawan, D. (2024). Interpretasi ragam hias naga pada Candi Naga Panataran: Sebuah kajian semiotik Peirce [Interpretation of naga ornamentation at Candi Naga Panataran: A Peircean semiotic study]. Amerta, 42(1), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.55981/amt.2024.3119
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8; C. Hartshorne, P. Weiss, & A. W. Burks, Eds.). Harvard University Press.
Phutthanathanapa, C., Narongchai, W., & Chumnanmak, R. (2022). The belief of the Nagas and its sign creation in Poo Phayanak Shrine at the 2nd Thai–Lao Friendship Bridge in Mukdahan Province. Rangsit Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 9(2), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.14456/rjsh.2022.14
Presto, A. C. R., & Viceral, E. R. H. B. (2025). Folklore as a decolonial tool: Examining Isabelo de los Reyes’s El Folk-Lore Filipino. Banwaan. https://journals.upd.edu.ph/index.php/Banwaan/article/view/10584
Rosetti, I., Bertrand Cabral, C., Pereira Roders, A., Jacobs, M., & Albuquerque, R. (2022). Heritage and sustainability: Regulating participation. Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1674. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031674
Scott, W. H. (1982). Boat-building and seamanship in classic Philippine society. Philippine Studies, 30(3), 335–376.
Smith, A. D. (1999). Myths and memories of the nation. Oxford University Press.
Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
UNESCO. (2003). Convention for the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage. https://ich.unesco.org/en/convention
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda
Whyte, K. P. (2021). Against crisis epistemology. In B. Hokowhitu, A. Moreton-Robinson, L. Tuhiwai-Smith, C. Andersen, & S. Larkin (Eds.), Routledge handbook of critical Indigenous studies (pp. 52–64). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429440229-6
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.
Zurba, M., Petriello, M. A., Madge, C., McCarney, P., Bishop, B., McBeth, S., Denniston, M., Bodwitch, H., & Bailey, M. (2022). Learning from knowledge co-production research and practice in the twenty-first century: Global lessons and what they mean for collaborative research in Nunatsiavut. Sustainability Science, 17, 449–467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-021-00996-x
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
