Reading Challenges Encountered by Learners and Teacher-Implemented Interventions: A Structured Literature Review

Authors

  • Mac Taner T. Almazan Pangasinan State University – Bayambang Campus Author
  • Julie Ann B. Almeda Pangasinan State University – Bayambang Campus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19064997

Keywords:

reading acquisition, literacy intervention, phonological awareness, structured literacy, educational research synthesis

Abstract

Reading proficiency remains a critical determinant of learners’ academic success and long-term educational attainment. However, persistent difficulties in early reading acquisition continue to be reported across diverse educational contexts. This study provides a structured literature review examining the reading challenges encountered by learners and the instructional interventions implemented to address these difficulties. A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies was conducted across ERIC, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies focusing on early and elementary-level learners were analyzed through thematic synthesis. The review identifies recurrent learner-level challenges, including deficits in phonological awareness, limited vocabulary development, decoding difficulties, and comprehension deficits. Contextual factors such as socio-economic disparities, multilingual environments, and limited instructional resources further compound these challenges. A systematic search of peer-reviewed studies was conducted across ERIC, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Using predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, studies focusing on early and elementary-level learners were analyzed through thematic synthesis. The review identifies recurrent learner-level challenges, including deficits in phonological awareness, limited vocabulary development, decoding difficulties, and comprehension deficits. Contextual factors such as socio-economic disparities, multilingual environments, and limited instructional resources further compound these challenges. Findings indicate that evidence-based interventions particularly explicit phonics instruction, structured literacy approaches, differentiated instruction, formative assessment practices, and family engagement initiatives demonstrate positive effects on reading development when implemented systematically and consistently. However, variability in implementation fidelity and contextual adaptation influences intervention effectiveness. This review contributes to the field by integrating learner-level and contextual determinants within a consolidated analytical framework, highlighting gaps in research in low-resource and linguistically diverse settings. The study offers implications for literacy policy, teacher professional development, and future empirical investigations aimed at improving reading outcomes globally.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Azuela, M., Santos, R., & Lopez, T. (2023). Parental involvement and literacy development in elementary learners. Journal of Literacy Studies, 15(2), 45–63.

Beck, I. L., McKeown, M. G., & Kucan, L. (2013). Bringing words to life: Robust vocabulary instruction (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.

Birsh, J. R. (2011). Multisensory teaching of basic language skills (3rd ed.). Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Bus, A. G., van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Pellegrini, A. D. (1995). Joint book reading makes for success in learning to read: A meta-analysis on intergenerational transmission of literacy. Review of Educational Research, 65(1), 1–21.

Cariaso, R. (2025). Philippine early literacy initiatives: Policies and outcomes. Philippine Journal of Education Policy, 7(1), 12–29.

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.

Cervetti, G. N., & Hiebert, E. H. (2019). Knowledge-building approaches to reading comprehension instruction. In L. Verhoeven & C. Perfetti (Eds.), Reading comprehension: Strategies, processes, and skills (pp. 205–230). Routledge.

Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1998). What reading does for the mind. American Educator, 22(1–2), 8–15.

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading comprehension. Educational Leadership, 78(4), 18–24.

Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). International Reading Association.

Edyburn, D. L. (2013). Critical issues in advancing the special education technology evidence base. Exceptional Children, 80(1), 7–24.

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. (2007). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77(3), 520–548.

Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

International Dyslexia Association (IDA). (2019). Structured literacy and dyslexia: Research foundations.

Kim, Y. (2020). Digital tools and reading engagement: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 23(2), 45–58.

Lagdaan, L., & Sevilla, J. (2025). Improving reading comprehension in Filipino learners through structured strategies. Philippine Journal of Literacy Research, 8(1), 33–49.

Moats, L. C. (2020). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers (3rd ed.). Brookes Publishing.

Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Words as tools: Learning academic vocabulary as language acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 91–108.

National Reading Panel (NRP). (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Petscher, Y., Kim, Y. S., Foorman, B., & Cheung, A. (2020). Early identification and intervention for reading difficulties. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(3), 451–469.

Pressley, M. (2000). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. Guilford Press.

Rasinski, T. V. (2010). The fluent reader: Oral reading strategies for building word recognition, fluency, and comprehension (2nd ed.). Scholastic.

Ritchey, K. D., & Goeke, J. L. (2006). Orton-Gillingham and Orton-Gillingham–based reading instruction: A review of the literature. Journal of Special Education, 40(3), 171–183.

Saeed, F. (2024). Technology-assisted reading interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 25(1), 10–29.

Shaywitz, S. E., & Shaywitz, B. A. (2008). Paying attention to reading: The neurobiology of reading and dyslexia. Development and Psychopathology, 20(4), 1329–1349.

Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., Chambers, B., Cheung, A., & Davis, S. (2009). Effective reading programs for elementary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79(4), 1469–1503.

Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. RAND Corporation.

Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. National Academy Press.

Spear-Swerling, L. (2015). Patterns of reading difficulties and effective interventions. In L. Spear-Swerling, Patterns of reading difficulties and effective interventions (pp. 23–48). Brookes Publishing.

Stanovich, K. E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21(4), 360–407.

Torgesen, J. K., Alexander, A., Wagner, R. K., Rashotte, C. A., Voeller, K., & Conway, T. (2001). Intensive remedial instruction for children with severe reading disabilities: Immediate and long-term outcomes from two instructional approaches. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(1), 33–58.

Vanguri, P., Mraz, M., & Miller, B. (2015). Reading challenges in early learners: Cognitive and affective factors. Reading Psychology, 36(2), 123–145.

Wright, T., & Cervetti, G. N. (2020). Vocabulary instruction for literacy success: Evidence-based practices. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S205–S227.

Yacoub, F. (2025). Prevalence and profiles of dyslexia in early literacy. International Journal of Special Education, 40(2), 55–72.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-17

How to Cite

Almazan, M. T., & Almeda, J. A. (2026). Reading Challenges Encountered by Learners and Teacher-Implemented Interventions: A Structured Literature Review. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(3), 1136-1149. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19064997

Similar Articles

11-20 of 108

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.