Evaluating the Preparedness of High School Practice Teachers for MATATAG Curriculum Implementation

Authors

  • Kimberly B. Inaldo Pangasinan State University-Bayambang Pangasinan, Philippines Author
  • Rico A. Reyes Pangasinan State University-Bayambang Pangasinan, Philippines Author
  • Peter Pat-Rick B. Miguel Pangasinan State University-Bayambang Pangasinan, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19244860

Keywords:

MATATAG Curriculum, teacher preparedness, practice teachers, curriculum implementation, professional development

Abstract

This study titled “Evaluating the Preparedness of High School Practice Teachers for MATATAG Curriculum Implementation” sought to determine the level of readiness of high school practice teachers in adapting to the newly introduced MATATAG Curriculum of the Department of Education (DepEd). Specifically, it aimed to assess their preparedness in terms of professional development and training, resource availability, self-efficacy and attitudes, concerns and challenges, overall readiness, and the extent of school support needed for curriculum transition. The study employed a descriptive-quantitative research design, utilizing a researcher-made survey questionnaire administered to 235 practice teachers from various education programs of Pangasinan State University (PSU) Bayambang Campus. Data were analyzed using frequency counts, percentage, and weighted mean to describe the respondents’ demographic profile and level of preparedness across key dimensions. Findings revealed that the majority of the respondents were female (67.37%), and representing a diverse range of teacher education programs, with the Bachelor of Secondary Education – Science and Mathematics majors forming the largest groups. Results showed that respondents were “Prepared” across all readiness domains, with mean scores ranging from 2.94 to 3.09, indicating sufficient confidence, competence, and adaptability to implement the MATATAG Curriculum. Among the indicators, self-efficacy and attitudes obtained the highest mean (3.09), signifying that practice teachers possess strong motivation and confidence to achieve curriculum goals. Furthermore, school support for curriculum transition was rated as “Highly Needed” (M = 3.36), underscoring the importance of continuous professional development, mentoring, access to instructional and digital resources, and emotional support in sustaining readiness. The study concludes that while practice teachers demonstrate commendable levels of preparedness for the MATATAG Curriculum, their success in actual classroom implementation largely depends on the extent of institutional support and continuous capacity-building provided by their teacher education institution and the Department of Education. The findings emphasize the need for ongoing professional training, mentoring systems, and resource enhancement to ensure that preservice teachers remain equipped and confident in implementing the reformed curriculum. This research contributes to the growing discourse on teacher readiness and curriculum reform in the Philippine education system, highlighting that effective curriculum implementation requires both individual competence and systemic institutional support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aquino, E. (2024). Developing an evaluation scale for assessing the effective implementation of Matatag Curriculum in Philippine public schools: exploratory sequential design. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(5), 167-184. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0074

Aquino, J. R. (2024). Revisiting the K to 12 program: The MATATAG curriculum reform and its implications for Philippine basic education. Philippine Journal of Educational Development, 39(2), 45–60.

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2021). Curriculum reforms and teacher preparedness in the Philippine basic education system. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(2), 236–251.

Cabarogias, A., Balagtas, L., & Ramos, J. (2023). Teachers’ Preparedness for the MATATAG Curriculum: Insights from Early Implementation. Philippine Journal of Educational Policy, 12(2), 44–58.

Cabrera, L., & De Guzman, F. (2020). Reinforcing the Role of Humanities Teachers in Developing 21st-Century Skills under the K to 12 Program. Philippine Journal of Teacher Education, 5(2), 34–47.

Capuno, R., Cupino, A., & Lapinid, M. (2020). Pre-Service Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Teaching Performance, and Readiness for Practice Teaching. International Journal of Education and Research, 8(8), 77–88.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

De Guzman, A. B., & De Castro, B. V. (2008). Research methods for the behavioral sciences. Manila: Rex Book Store.

Department of Education (2023). MATATAG Curriculum Framework: Strengthening Foundational Skills for Lifelong Learning. Manila: DepEd Central Office.

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum guide. Republic of the Philippines. https://www.deped.gov.ph

DepEd. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum: Revised K to 10 framework. Department of Education.

Estrellado, CJ. (2023). MATATAG Curriculum: Why Curriculum [must] Change? Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0001

Estrellado, M. C. (2024). Teacher preparedness and curriculum reform: Examining pre-service training and implementation readiness under the MATATAG framework. Asian Education Review, 12(1), 23–35.

Etikan, I., & Bala, K. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biostatistics & Biometrics Open Access Journal, 5(6), 00149.

Flores, M., & Day, C. (2021). Context Matters: The Role of Professional Development in Teachers’ Curriculum Implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 104, 103–366.

Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L., & Stuckey, D. (2018). Seven Trends: The Transformation of the Teaching Force. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

Lagbao, J. (2024). INITIAL IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MATATAG CURRICULUM: VIEWS OF THE TEACHERS AND PRINCIPALS. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics Commerce and Educational Management DOI:10.36713/epra17629

Lagbao, R. F. (2024). Curriculum enhancement and 21st-century learning: An analysis of the MATATAG reform initiative. International Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16(3), 87–101.

Magno, C., & Peñano-Ho, L. (2020). Sustaining Teacher Competence through Reflective Professional Development. Philippine Journal of Education, 93(1), 25–40.

Mirasol, A., & Flores, J. (2021). Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Preparedness of Pre-service Teachers in Implementing Curriculum Reforms. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 41(3), 502–517.

Nolasco, R. (2023). Gender-Responsive Approaches to Curriculum Implementation in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Education, 97(2), 45–56.

Punzalan, M. L. (2022). Gender Trends in Teacher Education: A Philippine Perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Education Research, 10(1), 73–88.

Reyes, M., Alipio, M., & Tarrayo, V. (2022). Integrating Physical Education and Life Skills in the MATATAG Curriculum. International Journal of Educational Research, 114, 101–121.

Saguin, K. (2020). Gender and the Teaching Workforce in the Philippines. Philippine Social Science Review, 72(3), 201–218.

Santiago, E., & Esguerra, R. (2019). Diversity and Gender Balance in the Teaching Profession. International Journal of Educational Development, 68, 102–112.

Subia, G. S. (2020). Think like my teacher (TLMT): A new method in assessing millennial learners’ statistics performance. International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society, 2(1), 52–63.

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Tarrayo, V., & Datukan, R. (2022). Pre-Service Teachers’ Readiness and Professional Learning in Curriculum Reform Implementation. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(5), 567–583.

Tarrayo, V., Alipio, M., & Datukan, R. (2022). Digital Readiness and Resource Utilization among Pre-Service Teachers in Post-Pandemic Classrooms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(5), 567–583.

Tarrayo, V., Alipio, M., & Datukan, R. (2022). Teacher Dispositions and Curriculum Reforms: Building Efficacy and Attitudes for Sustainable Pedagogy. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 50(5), 567–583.

Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2020). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing an Elusive Construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, 103–110.

UNESCO. (2021). Global Education Monitoring Report 2021/2: Teachers in a Changing World. Paris: UNESCO Publishing.

Villanueva, A., & De Guzman, A. (2022). Teacher Efficacy and Positive Attitudes toward Educational Reform in Philippine Classrooms. Philippine Social Science Review, 74(2), 101–120.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-27

How to Cite

Inaldo, K., Reyes, R., & Miguel, P. P.-R. (2026). Evaluating the Preparedness of High School Practice Teachers for MATATAG Curriculum Implementation. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(3), 2109-2130. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19244860

Similar Articles

1-10 of 136

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.