Extent of Mathematics Teachers’ Utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence Across Key Pedagogical Dimensions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19355314Keywords:
GenAI, Mathematics, preparation, instruction, assessment, Dose-response, action planAbstract
This study was conducted in view of the current state of utilization of Generative Artificial Intelligence by teachers and students alike. Specifically, it sought to investigate the extent to which Mathematics teachers in private schools in Manila use Generative AI as a tool to help them in the preparation, instruction and evaluation dimensions of teaching. Analyses of significant differences in extent of generative AI utilization when the 83 teacher participants were grouped according to sex, age generation (X, Y and Z), educational attainment, and amount of AI training received were conducted. Using a non-experimental, cross-sectional, quantitative descriptive - comparative research design, findings included that there is a relatively balanced use of Generative AI as a tool for the pedagogic dimensions of preparation, instruction and evaluation. When results were analyzed for correlation between extent of utilization and group characteristics, it showed that there is no significant difference in the use of generative AI between male and female, between age generation and educational attainment. The only significant finding is on the amount of Generative AI training received especially between those that reported having received only “basic” training and those that received “extensive training where the p-value is <0.001 These results highlighted the need to provide teachers with a research-based structured Generative AI training for using it as a tool for teaching Mathematics in the three specified pedagogic domains. The researcher proposed, based on the findings, a three-tiered “dose-response” training program where training load (dose) will align with the expected performance change (response). The action plan aims at providing Mathematics teachers the opportunity to universally receive basic training on the use of generative AI while at the same time providing a pathway that will enable them to become experts, and then later, mentors or coaches on the utilization of generative AI as aid for teaching.
Downloads
References
Aljemely, Y. (2024). Challenges and best practices in training teachers to utilize artificial intelligence: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1470853
Al Abdullatif, A.M. (2024). Modeling Teachers’ Acceptance of Generative Artificial Intelligence Use in Higher Education: The Role of AI Literacy, Intelligent TPACK, and Perceived Trust. Education Sciences, 14(11), Article 1209. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14111209
Campos, D.G., Scherer, R. (2024). Digital gender gaps in Students’ knowledge, attitudes and skills: an integrative data analysis across 32 Countries. Education and Information Technology 29, 655–693. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12272-9
Chan, C. K. Y., & Lee, K. K. W. (2023). The AI generation gap: Are Gen Z students more interested in adopting generative AI such as ChatGPT in teaching and learning than their Gen X and millennial generation teachers? Smart Learn.Environ. 10, Article 60. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00269-3
Department for Education. (2024). Generative AI in education: Educator and expert views. The Open Innovation Team. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/generative-ai-in-education-educator-and-expert-views
Đerić, E., Frank, D., & Milković, M. (2025). Trust in Generative AI Tools: A Comparative Study of Higher Education Students, Teachers, and Researchers. Information, 16(7), 622. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16070622
Ghimire, A., & Edwards, J. (2024). Generative AI Adoption in Classroom in Context of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2406.15360
Guo, F., Li, T., & Cunningham, C. J. L. (2025). One year in the classroom with ChatGPT: Empirical insights and transformative impacts. Frontiers in Education,10 https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1574477
Hazzan-Bishara, A., Kol, O. & Levy, S. (2005). The factors affecting teachers’ adoption of AI technologies: A unified model of external and internal determinants. Education Information Technology 30, 15043–15069. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13393-z
Marzano, D. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI) in Teaching and Learning Processes at the K 12 Level: A Systematic Review. Technology, Knowledge and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-025-09853-7
Møgelvang, A., Bjelland, C., Grassini, S., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Gender Differences in the Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Higher Education: Characteristics and Consequences. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121363
Orser, B., Riding, A., & Li, Y. (2019). Technology adoption and gender-inclusive entrepreneurship education and training. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 273–298. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2019-0026
Osman, A. M., Jaffe, P. I., Ng, N. F., Kerlan, K. R., & Schafer, R. J. (2023). Transfer of learning: Analysis of dose-response functions from a large-scale, online, cognitive training dataset. PLOS ONE, 18(5), e0281095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0281095
Pettygrove, S. (2024). Dose – response relationship. Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/science/dose-response-relationship
Picton, I., & Clark, C. (2025). Teachers’ use of generative AI to support literacy in 2025. National Literacy Trust. ERIC Number: ED675267.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1108/10748120110424816
Salinas Navarro, D. E., Vilalta Perdomo, E., Michel Villarreal, R., & Montesinos, L. (2024). Designing experiential learning activities with generative artificial intelligence tools for authentic assessment. Interactive Technology and Smart Education. 21(4), 708-734. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-12-2023-0236
Tsiani, M., Lefkos, I., & Fachantidis, N. (2025). Perceptions of generative AI in education: Insights from undergraduate and master’s level future teachers. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202531943
Tang, Y., & Zhong, L. (2026). K 12 Teachers’ Adoption of Generative AI for Teaching: An Extended TAM Perspective. Education Sciences, 16(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16010136
Vergara, J. P. C. (2024). Navigating the generative artificial intelligence era: Charting the course for curricular reform in higher education in the Philippines. (Public-Policy Monograph Series). UP Center for Integrative and Development Studies. cids.up.edu.ph
World Bank. (2025). Primary education, teachers (% female): Philippines [World Development Indicators]. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SE.PRM.TCHR.FE.ZS
World Bank Group. (2025). Gender and inclusion in digital. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/digital/brief/gender-and-inclusion-in-digital
Yang, H. (2025). Harnessing generative AI: Exploring its impact on cognitive engagement, emotional engagement, learning retention, reward sensitivity, and motivation through reinforcement theory. Learning and Motivation, 90, 102136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102136
Yunusov, Q. (2025). The Generational “AI Divide”: How Different Age Groups (Globally) Use and Perceive Generative AI. Retrieved from: LinkedIn Articles. https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/generational-divide-how-different-age-groups-globally-yunusov-ofb0f/
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
