Self-Regulated Learning and Mathematical Modeling Competence Among Secondary School Students in Technology-Enhanced Classrooms

Authors

  • Editha B. Paguyo Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19723925

Keywords:

self-regulated learning, mathematical modeling competence, technology-enhanced classrooms, secondary school students, mathematics education, problem solving

Abstract

Guided by the growing need to strengthen independent learning and real-world mathematical reasoning, this study determined the relationship between self-regulated learning and mathematical modeling competence among secondary school students in technology-enhanced classrooms at Isabela National High School in the City of Ilagan, Isabela. Using a quantitative descriptive-correlational design, the study involved students selected through simple random sampling. A validated survey questionnaire was used to measure self-regulated learning in terms of goal setting and planning, self-monitoring and strategy use, and self-reflection and adjustment, as well as mathematical modeling competence in terms of understanding and interpreting real-world problems, formulating mathematical representations, and analyzing and validating solutions in context. Descriptive statistics such as weighted mean and standard deviation were used to determine the levels of the two variables, while Pearson Product-Moment Correlation and multiple regression analysis were employed to test their relationship and predictive dimensions. Findings revealed that the respondents demonstrated high levels of self-regulated learning and mathematical modeling competence. A significant positive relationship was also found between the two variables, indicating that students with stronger self-regulatory behaviors tended to show higher competence in mathematical modeling. Among the dimensions of self-regulated learning, self-monitoring and strategy use emerged as the strongest predictor of mathematical modeling competence. The findings suggest that strengthening students’ self-regulatory capacities in technology-enhanced mathematics classrooms may contribute to improved performance in modeling-oriented tasks and more meaningful engagement in real-world mathematical problem solving.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cevikbas, M., Kaiser, G., & Schukajlow, S. (2022). A systematic literature review of the current discussion on mathematical modelling competencies: State-of-the-art developments in conceptualizing, measuring, and fostering. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109(2), 205–236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10104-6

City Government of Ilagan. (n.d.). Education. City Government of Ilagan.

Cohen-Nissan, O., & Kohen, Z. (2023). Secondary school students’ competencies and motivation to engage in mathematical modelling tasks in a virtual learning environment. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1140364. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1140364

Department of Education. (2024, August 4). DepEd strengthens digital education efforts, partners with Khan Academy.

Department of Education. (2025). Quality Basic Education Development Plan (Q-BEDP) 2025 to 2035. Department of Education.

Engelmann, K., Bannert, M., & Melzner, N. (2021). Do self-created metacognitive prompts promote short- and long-term effects in computer-based learning environments? Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-021-00148-w

Kaiser, G. (2020). Mathematical modelling and applications in education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education (2nd ed., pp. 553–561). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_101

Letchumanan, M., Husain, S. K. S., & Ayub, A. F. M. (2024). Self-regulated learning in mathematics online learning environment: A systematic review. The Journal of Educators Online, 21(4). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2024.21.4.6

Lindl, A., Durandt, R., & Blum, W. (2025). Fostering mathematical modelling competency in different learning environments and educational contexts: An exploratory comparative analysis of four intervention studies. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 57, 351–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-025-01680-5

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/dfe0bf9c-en

Panadero, E. (2017). A review of self-regulated learning: Six models and four directions for research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, Article 422. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422

Říčan, J., Chytrý, V., & Medová, J. (2022). Aspects of self-regulated learning and their influence on the mathematics achievement of fifth graders in the context of four different proclaimed curricula. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 963151. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.963151

Tinajero, C., Mayo, M. E., Villar, E., & Martínez-López, Z. (2024). Classic and modern models of self-regulated learning: Integrative and componential analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1307574. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1307574

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education: A tool on whose terms? UNESCO.

Wang, Y., & Sperling, R. A. (2020). Characteristics of effective self-regulated learning interventions in mathematics classrooms: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 5, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2020.00058

Zheng, L. (2016). The effectiveness of self-regulated learning scaffolds on academic performance in computer-based learning environments: A meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-016-9426-9

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Paguyo, E. (2026). Self-Regulated Learning and Mathematical Modeling Competence Among Secondary School Students in Technology-Enhanced Classrooms. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(4), 1248-1265. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19723925

Similar Articles

31-40 of 239

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.