Inclusive Education in Practice: Evaluating Strategies That Support Diverse Learners in Canadian Schools

Authors

  • Oswin Osric A. Malabug Northeastern College Author
  • Severino T. Morales Jr. Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19737103

Keywords:

accessibility, collaboration, diverse learners, inclusive education, learner participation, school support systems

Abstract

This study responded to the continuing demand for stronger school-based support systems by evaluating the strategies that sustain inclusive education for diverse learners in Canadian schools. Using a cross-sectional predictive-explanatory survey design, data were collected through a validated researcher-developed questionnaire administered to school personnel directly involved in inclusive practice. The instrument demonstrated strong content validity and internal consistency, with an overall Cronbach’s alpha of .92. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling, with Importance-Performance Map Analysis used to identify priority areas for improvement. Findings revealed that inclusive instructional design, classroom accommodation and responsiveness, collaborative support systems, and learner participation and belonging were all rated high. Among the dimensions, inclusive instructional design obtained the highest descriptive rating, while collaborative support systems registered the lowest performance. Structural model results showed that all three strategy domains significantly predicted learner participation and belonging, with collaborative support systems emerging as the strongest predictor. The model explained 61% of the variance in learner participation and belonging, indicating moderate to substantial predictive power. The results suggested that inclusive education was most effective when it extended beyond individual classroom adjustments and operated through coordinated, school-wide support mechanisms. The study concluded that while inclusive practices were already evident, stronger collaboration among educators, specialists, school leaders, and families remained essential for deepening meaningful participation and belonging among diverse learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ainscow, M. (2020). Inclusion and equity in education: Making sense of global challenges. Prospects, 49(3–4), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09506-w

Ainscow, M., & Messiou, K. (2018). Engaging with the views of students to promote inclusion in education. Journal of Educational Change, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-017-9312-1

Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal design for learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journal papers from 2012 to 2015. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19295

Council of Ministers of Education, Canada. (2023). CMEC Indigenous Education Plan (IEP), 2023–27. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada.

Emmers, E., Vanderlinde, R., & De Wever, B. (2022). Key competencies for inclusive education teachers: A systematic literature review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103678

Government of Canada. (2025). Universal Design for Learning (UDL). Digital Accessibility Toolkit.

Kurowski, M., Černý, M., & Trapl, F. (2022). A review study of research articles on the barriers to inclusive education in primary schools. Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 15(2), 101–111. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2022.150206

Leung, E., Adams-Whittaker, J., Sha, K., & Flanagan, T. (2024). Evaluating Canadian pre-service educator programs in response to changing diversity and inclusion needs. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 6, 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100326

Sannen, J., De Maeyer, S., Struyf, E., De Schauwer, E., & Petry, K. (2021). Connecting teacher collaboration to inclusive practices using a social network approach. Teaching and Teacher Education, 97, 103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103182

Statistics Canada. (2025, January 27). Youth with disabilities: Education and employment, 2022. The Daily.

UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report 2020: Inclusion and education: All means all. UNESCO.

Vantieghem, W., Roose, I., Goosen, K., Schelfhout, W., & Van Avermaet, P. (2023). Education for all in action: Measuring teachers’ competences for inclusive education. PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0291033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291033

Whitley, J., & Hollweck, T. (2020). Inclusion and equity in education: Current policy reform in Nova Scotia, Canada. Prospects, 49(3–4), 297–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09503-z

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Malabug, O. O., & Morales, S. J. (2026). Inclusive Education in Practice: Evaluating Strategies That Support Diverse Learners in Canadian Schools. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(4), 1447-1457. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19737103

Similar Articles

121-130 of 231

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)