Lessons in Earth Science Using Digitally Printed Three-Dimensional (3D) Models

Authors

  • Leo G. Bogayan Bicol University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20174239

Keywords:

digitally printed 3D models, Earth Science instruction, conceptual understanding, higher-order thinking skills, science process skills, collaborative skills, science education, educational technology, active learning, Grade 8 students

Abstract

This study developed and evaluated lessons in Earth Science using digitally printed three-dimensional (3D) models to enhance Grade 8 students’ conceptual understanding, higher-order thinking skills, science process skills, and collaborative skills. The study utilized a Research and Development (R&D) design combined with a quasi-experimental research approach involving control and experimental groups. The developed instructional materials included digitally printed 3D models representing selected Earth Science concepts such as earthquakes, faults, typhoons, comets, meteors, and asteroids. These materials were integrated into lesson plans and collaborative classroom activities aligned with the Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs) prescribed by the Department of Education.

The findings revealed that the developed instructional materials were highly acceptable in terms of content accuracy, instructional quality, usability, and alignment with curriculum competencies. Results further showed that students exposed to the 3D model-based instruction demonstrated significantly higher posttest scores in conceptual understanding, higher-order thinking skills, science process skills, and collaborative skills compared to students taught using conventional instructional methods. The use of interactive and manipulative 3D models enhanced students’ visualization of abstract Earth Science concepts and promoted active participation, inquiry-based learning, and collaborative engagement in classroom activities.

The study concludes that integrating digitally printed 3D models into Earth Science instruction significantly improves students’ academic performance and learning experiences. The findings highlight the effectiveness of technology-enhanced instructional materials in promoting meaningful, learner-centered, and interactive science education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. National Academy Press.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Department of Education. (2022). Most essential learning competencies in science for junior high school. Department of Education Philippines.

Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.

Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(23), 8410–8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111

Hasiuk, F. J., Harding, C., Holland, D., & Townsend, J. (2017). 3D printing in the geosciences. GSA Today, 27(8), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1130/GSATG328A.1

Horowitz, S. S., & Schultz, P. H. (2014). Printing space: Using 3D printing of digital terrain models in geosciences education and research. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(1), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.5408/13-031.1

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365–379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057

Kali, Y., & Orion, N. (1996). Spatial abilities of high-school students in the perception of geologic structures. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(4), 369–391. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199604)33:4

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I): The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/53f23881-en

Padilla, M. J. (1990). The science process skills. National Association for Research in Science Teaching.

Piaget, J. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.

UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Technology in education. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.unesco.org/gem-report/en/2023-technology

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-14

How to Cite

Bogayan, L. (2026). Lessons in Earth Science Using Digitally Printed Three-Dimensional (3D) Models. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 616-631. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20174239

Similar Articles

41-50 of 271

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.