Effectiveness of a Rapid Math Assessment (RMA)-Based Intervention Program on the Numeracy Performance of Key Stage 2 Learners of Mahogany Integrated School, Lingig II District, Division of Surigao del Sur: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Authors

  • Mary Ann Morata-Portillo Mahogany Integrated School, Lingig II District, Surigao del Sur Division Author
  • Rio S. Consigna Andres Soriano Colleges of Bislig Author
  • Juliet C. Burgos Andres Soriano Colleges of Bislig Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20259921

Keywords:

Rapid Math Assessment, numeracy performance, intervention program, Key Stage 2 learners, quasi-experimental study, mathematics intervention

Abstract

This study determined the effectiveness of a Rapid Math Assessment (RMA)-Based Intervention Program on the numeracy performance of Key Stage 2 learners at Mahogany Integrated School, Lingig II District, Division of Surigao del Sur. It examined learners' performance before and after the intervention in number sense and place value, basic operations, fractions and decimals, and problem-solving skills, and identified the numeracy domain that showed the greatest improvement. The study used a quantitative quasi-experimental one-group pretest-posttest design. Sixty Key Stage 2 learners from Grades 4, 5, and 6 were included through total enumeration. The Rapid Mathematics Assessment served as the diagnostic and outcome measure. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, paired samples t-test, and mean gain scores. Findings showed that learners' overall pretest Mean Percentage Score was 42.16, interpreted as Emerging/Low. After the intervention, the overall posttest Mean Percentage Score increased to 54.94, interpreted as Developing. The paired samples t-test showed a statistically significant improvement in numeracy performance, t(59) = 5.06, p < .001, with a moderate practical effect (Cohen's dz = 0.65). The greatest improvement was observed in Fractions and Decimals, with a gain of 18.71 percentage points, followed by Problem-Solving Skills with a gain of 15.05. However, Number Sense and Place Value remained the weakest domain and requires further targeted intervention. The study concluded that the Rapid Math Assessment-Based Intervention Program was effective in improving the numeracy performance of Key Stage 2 learners. The findings emphasize the value of assessment-based intervention, differentiated instruction, continuous numeracy monitoring, and sustained school support in addressing foundational mathematics learning gaps.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abadiano, M. N., & Turner, J. (2020). Numeracy development among elementary learners in Northern Mindanao. Philippine Journal of Education.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Walker, D. (2019). Introduction to research in education (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Bernardo, A. B. I. (2020). Foundations of mathematical thinking in Filipino learners. Asia Pacific Education Review.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dela Cruz, J. P., & Torres, R. M. (2023). Assessment-based mathematics intervention in elementary schools. Philippine Social Science Journal.

Department of Education. (2022). Policy guidelines on strengthening foundational literacy and numeracy.

Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Memorandum No. 373, s. 2024: Administration of Rapid Mathematics Assessment (RMA).

Department of Education Region XIII. (2023). Regional Education Development Plan for Caraga Region.

Department of Education - Schools Division Office of Surigao del Sur. (2021). Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan.

Department of Education - Schools Division Office of Surigao del Sur. (2023). Annual Education Report.

Department of Education Lingig II District. (2023). School Improvement Plan.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2019). How to design and evaluate research in education (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Malone, A. (2021). The role of assessment in mathematics intervention. Exceptional Children.

Gersten, R., et al. (2021). Supporting learners with mathematics difficulties through targeted intervention.

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. (2021). Improving mathematics instruction and problem solving. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

Hunt, J., & Empson, S. (2021). Fractions and proportional reasoning in elementary mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

Kaur, B., & Chan, C. M. (2021). Mathematics instruction and learners' conceptual understanding in Southeast Asian c lassrooms. Asia-Pacific Journal of Mathematics Education.

Lamon, S. J. (2020). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding (4th ed.). Routledge.

Malana, M. A., & Albano, E. L. (2022). Arithmetic difficulties among elementary learners in Metro Manila. Philippine Journal of Mathematics Education.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2020). Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all. NCTM.

Ng, S. F., & Lee, K. (2022). The role of formative assessment in improving mathematics learning in Singapore classrooms. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results: The state of learning and equity in education. OECD Publishing.

Orbeta, A. C., Paqueo, V., & Francisco-Abrigo, K. (2021). Learning loss and learning poverty in the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Othman, N., & Saat, R. (2020). Numeracy development among Malaysian primary school students. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction.

Powell, S. R., & Nelson, G. (2021). Developing computational fluency in elementary mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Putri, R. I. I., Zulkardi, Z., & Hartono, Y. (2021). Realistic mathematics education and number operations. Journal on Mathematics Education.

Rittle-Johnson, B., Fyfe, E. R., & Loehr, A. M. (2021). Improving conceptual and procedural knowledge in mathematics instruction.

Sarmiento, D., & Orale, R. (2021). Mathematics intervention strategies for improving arithmetic skills of Grade 4 learners. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2020). Teaching mathematical thinking and problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

SEAMEO. (2021). Strengthening foundational learning in Southeast Asia. SEAMEO.

SEAMEO & UNICEF. (2020). SEA-PLM 2019 main regional report: Children's learning in Southeast Asia. Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization.

Siegler, R. S., Lortie-Forgues, H., & Fazio, L. K. (2020). Development of fraction and decimal understanding. Psychological Science in the Public Interest.

World Bank. (2022). The state of global learning poverty: 2022 update. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-18

How to Cite

Morata-Portillo, M. A., Consigna, R., & Burgos, J. (2026). Effectiveness of a Rapid Math Assessment (RMA)-Based Intervention Program on the Numeracy Performance of Key Stage 2 Learners of Mahogany Integrated School, Lingig II District, Division of Surigao del Sur: A Quasi-Experimental Study. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 851-859. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20259921

Similar Articles

51-60 of 333

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.