Technology-Enhanced Assessment and Professional Reflection in Teacher Education: A Review of Related Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20325494Keywords:
teacher education, technology-enhanced assessment, professional reflection, formative assessment, digital pedagogy, assessment literacyAbstract
The rapid integration of digital technologies in education has reshaped assessment practices and professional learning in teacher education. This review synthesized empirical and theoretical literature on technology-enhanced assessment and digital professional reflection tools, with attention to their contributions to assessment literacy, pedagogical judgment, teaching competence, and continuous professional improvement. Using a systematic narrative review approach, the article drew primarily on peer-reviewed studies and foundational works on assessment literacy, peer review of teaching, reflective practice, and teaching expertise. The synthesis showed that digital assessment platforms, e-portfolios, learning analytics, digital rubrics, peer-feedback systems, and video-based reflection tools can strengthen teachers’ pedagogical knowledge, technical assessment skills, feedback practices, and reflective inquiry. However, the literature also indicates that these tools do not automatically produce deeper pedagogical judgment. Their effectiveness depends on teachers’ assessment literacy, beliefs about assessment, motivation, institutional trust, and the clear separation of developmental and evaluative purposes. The review concludes that technology-enhanced assessment must be embedded in guided, theory-informed, collaborative, and developmental professional learning systems. Recommendations include integrating assessment literacy with reflective practice, strengthening feedback quality, using digital tools to support professional autonomy, and conducting longitudinal and cross-cultural research on technology-supported teacher learning.
Downloads
References
Adie, L. (2013). The development of teacher assessment identity through participation in online moderation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 20(1), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.650150
Bell, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2015). Situated learning, reflective practice and conceptual expansion: Effective peer observation for tutor development. Teaching in Higher Education, 20(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2014.945163
Billett, S., Harteis, C., & Gruber, H. (2018). Developing occupational expertise through everyday work activities and interactions. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 105–126). Cambridge University Press.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2006). Developing a theory of formative assessment. In J. Gardner (Ed.), Assessment and learning (pp. 81–100). Sage.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 30(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.2010.00195.x
Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 11(3), 301–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000304609
Coombs, A. J., DeLuca, C., & MacGregor, S. (2020). A person-centered analysis of teacher candidates’ approaches to assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, Article 102952. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102952
Donnelly, R. (2007). Perceived impact of peer observation of teaching in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 19(2), 117–129.
Gosling, D. (2014). Collaborative peer-supported review of teaching. In J. Sachs & M. Parsell (Eds.), Peer review of learning and teaching in higher education (pp. 13–31). Springer.
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2004). Evaluating our peers: Is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education, 29(4), 489–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/0307507042000236380
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Orsmond, P. (2005). Reflecting on reflective practices within peer observation. Studies in Higher Education, 30(2), 213–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070500043358
Kell, C., & Annetts, S. (2009). Peer review of teaching embedded practice or policy-holding complacency? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290802646156
Klinger, D. A., McDivitt, P. R., Howard, B. B., Munoz, M. A., Rogers, W. T., & Wylie, E. C. (2015). The classroom assessment standards for PreK–12 teachers. Kindle Direct Press.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Stigler, J. W., & Miller, K. F. (2018). Expertise and expert performance in teaching. In K. A. Ericsson, R. R. Hoffman, A. Kozbelt, & A. M. Williams (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 431–452). Cambridge University Press.
Tsui, A. B. M. (2005). Expertise in teaching: Perspectives and issues. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Expertise in second language learning and teaching (pp. 167–189). Palgrave Macmillan.
Xu, Y., & Brown, G. T. L. (2016). Teacher assessment literacy in practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.05.010
Zeng, L. M. (2020). Peer review of teaching in higher education: A systematic review of its impact on the professional development of university teachers from the teaching expertise perspective. Educational Research Review, 31, Article 100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100333
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
