Empowering Struggling Learners Through Project SERVES (Supportive and Engaging Resources Validated to Empower Struggling Students): A Developer-Centered Analysis of Implementation Challenges

Authors

  • Richard Brian B. Tutor Antonio C. Esguerra Memorial National High School Author
  • Jayson O. Antazo Antonio C. Esguerra Memorial National High School Author
  • Whayna N. Diana Antonio C. Esguerra Memorial National High School Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20325895

Keywords:

Project SERVES, instructional design, reflective practice, differentiation

Abstract

This phenomenological study aimed at examining the challenges faced among senior high school teachers in developing instructional materials for the Project SERVES (Supportive and Engaging Resources Validated to Empower Struggling Students) during School Year 2024-2025. The purpose of the study was to examine the perceptions of the respondents on the challenges they encountered in the development phase of learning modules/activity sheets. The study utilized a semi-structured interview protocol to explore the challenges the participants encountered in the implementation of the Project SERVES. The sample of six (6) participants was selected based on their experience relative to the project. Using thematic analysis, patterns relevant to the research questions were coded, categorized and identified themes. The results from the data analysis among teacher-participants focused on six themes: Cognitive and Emotional Demands of Instructional Design, Reflective Practice and Professional Growth, Learner-Centered Design for Diverse Contexts, Competency-Based Instruction and Differentiation, and Professional Learning, Motivation, and Time Management. Teachers navigate complex challenges in creating inclusive, learner-centered materials aligned with diverse student needs and curriculum competencies, all while facing practical constraints such as inadequate training, limited resources, and competing responsibilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2013). Successful qualitative research: A practical guide for beginners. SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

DepEd Order No. 35, s. 2016. The Learning Action Cell as a K to 12 Basic Education Program school-based continuing professional development strategy for the improvement of teaching and learning. Department of Education, Philippines.

Dunn, M. B., Stark, K., & Hunter, D. B. (2025). Emotional labor as teaching expertise: Reflective practices for teacher professional development workshops. Reflective Practice, 26(3), 413–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2025.2452567

Flores, M. A. (2018). Teacher resilience in adverse contexts: Issues of professionalism and professional identity. In M. Wosnitza, F. Peixoto, S. Beltman, & C. F. Mansfield (Eds.), Resilience in education: Concepts, contexts and connections (pp. 167–184). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76690-4_11

Gay, G. (2010). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press.

Houichi, A., & Sarnou, D. (2020). Cognitive load theory and its relation to instructional design: Perspectives of some Algerian university teachers of English. Arab World English Journal, 11(4), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no4.8

Jeong, S., Clyburn, J., Bhatia, N. S., McCourt, J., & Lemons, P. P. (2022). Student thinking in the professional development of college biology instructors: An analysis through the lens of sociocultural theory. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(2), Article ar30. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-01-0003

Morgan, H. (2021). Howard Gardner’s multiple intelligences theory and his ideas on promoting creativity. In F. Reisman (Ed.), Celebrating giants and trailblazers: A-Z of who’s who in creativity research and related fields (pp. 124–141). KIE Publications.

Morris, T. H. (2019). Experiential learning – a systematic review and revision of Kolb’s model. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(8), 1064–1077. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1570279

Sewell, A., Kennett, A., & Pugh, V. (2022). Universal Design for Learning as a theory of inclusive practice for use by educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice, 38(4), 364–378. https://doi.org/10.1080/02667363.2022.2111677

Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Töre, E. (2021). Investigation of emotional labor in teaching. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 8(3), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2021.8.3.225

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Tutor, R. B., Antazo, J., & Diana, W. (2026). Empowering Struggling Learners Through Project SERVES (Supportive and Engaging Resources Validated to Empower Struggling Students): A Developer-Centered Analysis of Implementation Challenges. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1238-1244. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20325895

Similar Articles

21-30 of 293

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.