Preparedness of Teachers among Selected Public Secondary Schools in the Implementation of Senior High School

Authors

  • Manuel M. Dela Peña Jr. Kalinga State University | Camalog National High School Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20326819

Keywords:

Preparedness, Senior High School, Implementation, Curriculum

Abstract

The study made use of the descriptive research method. The main gathering tool is the questionnaire. The data is gathered from the 39 respondents. The study also used the weighted mean and analysis of variance as the statistical tools. The study found that there are significant differences in the perceptions of respondents on the level of their preparedness in the implementation of senior high school along the moderator variable strand/track, educational attainment and teaching experience. There are also significant differences in the perceptions of respondents on the extent by which the factors affect their preparedness in the implementation of Senior High School. Furthermore, there are also significant differences in the perceptions of respondents on the degree of seriousness of problems in the implementation of Senior High School along the moderator variable strand/track, educational attainment, and teaching experience. Based from the findings of the study, it is recommended that the schools should be equipped with qualified teachers with their specific expertise. Teachers should be encouraged to undergo training with NC I, II, III even with Training Methodologies. There should be a prioritization and utilization of budget from the National Government according to the needs of the respective schools. Teachers should also be encouraged to attend various trainings in line with their field of specialization. The Department of Education shall provide more opportunities for preparing the teachers to face the challenges of the K to 12 Program. The very objectives of the K to 12 Program should be materialized so that it will not cast doubts among the members of the community. Seminars on K-12 and specialized trainings regarding K to 12among the teachers shall be conducted by the Department of Education in the locality. Experts in the central region shall also be invited as speakers. The Department of Education should also fast-track the distribution of items among the Senior High School applicants and shall strictly follow the guidelines for the hiring thereof. It further recommended that the teachers should also be encouraged to finish their masters degree, and equipped themselves with necessary skills and trainings along with the strand/track their school is offering in order to prepare them to be more effective and efficient teachers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Action for Economic Reforms & E-NET. (2008). Preliminary notes on FLEMMS. http://enetphil.org/main/images/stories/research_materials/Flemms_Notes_2008.pdf

Anniban, C. G. (2007). Factors affecting the performance of public high school teachers in Balbalan District, Kalinga Division [Unpublished manuscript].

Asian Development Bank. (1999). Philippine education for the 21st century: The 1998 Philippine education sector study.

Brunello, G., Fort, M., & Weber, G. (2007, October). For one more year with you: Changes in compulsory schooling, education and the distribution of wages in Europe (Discussion Paper No. 3102). Institute for the Study of Labor.

Constitution of the Republic of the Philippines (1987). art. XIV, §§ 1, 5.

Cruz, I. (2010a, September 16). Mini critique: The best of times. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=612391

Cruz, I. (2010b, September 23). Mini critique: Subtracting two years. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=614393

Cruz, I. (2010c, September 30). Mini critique: Changing the curriculum. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=616556

Cruz, I. (2010d, October 7). Mini critique: The enhanced curriculum. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=618534

Cruz, I. (2010e, October 14). Mini critique: The K+12 debate. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=620727

Cruz, I. (2010f, October 21). Mini critique: What is the K+12 plan? The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=622815

Cruz, I. (2010g, October 28). Mini critique: K+12 for the poor. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=624807

Cruz, I. (2010h, November 25). Mini critique: K+12 and HEIs. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=633259

Cruz, I. (2010i, December 2). Mini critique: K+12 and COCOPEA. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=635318

Cruz, I. (2010j, December 9). Mini critique: Afterthoughts. The Philippine Star. http://www.philstar.com/Article.aspx?articleId=643747

Department of Education. (2010, November 2). Salient points on the enhanced K+12 basic education program.

Education Policy and Data Center & UNESCO. (2009). Estimating the costs of achieving education for all in low-income countries.

Felipe, A., & Porio, C. (2010, September). Length of school cycle and “quality of education.” Philippine Education Research Journal. http://www.perj.org

Graduate Management News. (2005, January–February). The Bologna Accord: A European revolution with global implications. http://www.gmac.com/gmac/NewsandEvents/GMNews/2005/JanFeb/

Hanushek, E., & Wößmann, L. (2007). Education quality and economic growth. World Bank.

House of Representatives. (1991). Congressional Commission on Philippine Education (EDCOM) report.

House of Representatives, 15th Congress. (n.d.). House Bill No. 4199: An act enhancing the curriculum and increasing the number of years for basic education, appropriating funds therefor, and for other purposes.

International Qualifications Assessment Service. (2007). International education guide for the assessment of education from the Philippines. Government of Alberta.

Manasan, R. (2011, February 17). Equity of government spending on education and health [Conference presentation]. 2010 Philippine Public Expenditure Review Dissemination Workshop.

National Education For All Committee. (2006). Functionally literate Filipinos: An educated nation. Philippine Education For All (EFA) 2015 National Action Plan.

National Statistics Office. (2008). Functional Literacy, Education and Mass Media Survey (FLEMMS).

Senate of the Philippines, 15th Congress. (2011a, March 31). Committee Report No. 24 (Re: House Bill No. 3826 and Senate Bill No. 2700).

Senate of the Philippines, 15th Congress. (2011b, May 5). Committee Report No. 31 (Re: Senate Bill No. 2802).

Southeast Asian Ministers of Education Organization Regional Center for Educational Innovation and Technology. (2011). Content, structure, duration and adequacy of primary and secondary education in Southeast Asian countries: Preliminary findings.

Tan, E. (2011, January 26). The challenge of K-12 [Forum presentation]. Instituting Reforms: A Forum on the K+12 Program.

Teves, G., et al. (2011, January–February). K+12 in focus: A look at the Aquino administration’s flagship program in basic education. Educator Magazine.

UNESCO. (2004). Education for all global monitoring report 2005: The quality imperative.

UNESCO. (2010). EFA global monitoring report 2010: Reaching the marginalized.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Manuel Jr., D. P. (2026). Preparedness of Teachers among Selected Public Secondary Schools in the Implementation of Senior High School. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1245-1266. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20326819

Similar Articles

121-130 of 282

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.