Contextualized PhET Simulation-Based Assessment for Enhancing Grade 9 STE Students’ Understanding of Projectile Motion

Authors

  • Javer T. Degorio Department of Education, Dinagat School of Fisheries Author
  • Mauricio S. Adlaon Surigao del Norte State University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20337490

Keywords:

PhET simulations, projectile motion, science motivation, Grade 9 STE, simulation-based assessment

Abstract

This study investigated the effectiveness of contextualized PhET simulation-based assessments in enhancing Grade 9 STE students’ understanding of projectile motion and their motivation in learning physics. Employing a descriptive-correlational research design, 23 students at Dinagat School of Fisheries completed simulation tasks embedded in real-life scenarios, including net tossing, coconut games, and boat-to-shore throws. Student performance was evaluated using a 3–2–1 rubric, while motivation was measured through the Physics Motivation Questionnaire II (PMQ-II). Results revealed high mastery in most assessment tasks, particularly in identifying motion components and analyzing vertical motion, and very high motivation across all dimensions, with grade motivation scoring highest. Correlational analysis showed a significant moderate positive relationship between motivation and performance (r = 0.62, p = 0.002), indicating that more motivated students tended to perform better. Findings suggest that contextualized PhET simulation-based assessments not only enhance conceptual understanding and problem-solving skills but also foster student engagement and intrinsic motivation, supporting their adoption as authentic and effective assessment tools in physics education, especially in schools with limited laboratory resources.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alabidi, S., Alarabi, K., Tairab, H., Alamassi, S., & Alsalhi, N. R. (2023). The effect of computer simulations on students’ conceptual and procedural understanding of Newton’s second law of motion. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13140

Alsalhi, N. R., Ismail, A. A. K. H., Alqawasmi, A., Abdelkader, A. F. I., Alqatawneh, S., & Salem, O. (2024). The effect of using PhET interactive simulations on academic achievement of physics students in higher education institutions. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 24(1), 65–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.12738/jestp.2024.1.006

Andrin, A. R., & Adlaon, M. S. (2025). A literature review of action research trends and innovations for teaching physics in the Philippines. Asian Pacific Journal of Graduate Research, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.53623/apga.v5i1.694

Basri, N. A., Kusairi, S., Sunaryono, S., Irawan, I. D. A., & Sanusi, D. K. (2025). Teachers’ perspectives on students’ conceptual difficulties in magnetism: Challenges and instructional implications. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 493–506. https://doi.org/10.26618/w21dyv67

Buday, B. M., Dalisay, C. N. C., Emralino, B. S., & Laurio, S. L. R. (2023). Exploring students’ motivation and academic performance in learning Ohm’s Law using PhET simulations. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 20(2), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2023.20.2.2232

Campos, E., Hernández, E., Barniol, P., & Zavala, G. (2021). Phenomenographic analysis and comparison of students’ conceptual understanding of electric and magnetic fields and the principle of superposition. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(2), 020117. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.020117

Cezar, L., Velarde, J. J., & Palattao, S. (2023). The effectiveness of PhET simulation in the academic performance and engagement of Grade 10 physics students. Iligan City National School of Fisheries.

Dantic, M. J. P., & Fularon, A. R. (2022). PhET interactive simulation approach in teaching electricity and magnetism among science teacher education students. Journal of Science and Education (JSE), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.56003/jse.v2i2.101

Fuentes, J. H. W., Escalante, K. A., Manimog, A. J. C., & Garcia, M. P. (2025). Improving Grade 7 students’ understanding on the phases of matter through PhET interactive simulations. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 51(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajess/2025/v51i82216

Harudu, L., Nursalam, L. O., Kasmiati, S., Hasan, S., Sugiarto, A., Karim, A. T. A., & Sejati, A. E. (2024). The impact of PhET-assisted problem-solving model on enhancing students’ physics problem-solving skills in Indonesian high schools. Multi Discere Journal, 3(2), 59–71. https://doi.org/10.36312/mj.v3i2.2312

Levin, O., Frei-Landau, R., & Goldberg, C. (2023). Development and validation of a scale to measure the simulation-based learning outcomes in teacher education. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1116626. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1116626

Ndayisaba, A., & Tugirinshuti, G. J. (2025). Exploring the effectiveness of PhET simulations on students’ performance in electromagnetic induction within selected secondary schools of Nyamasheke District, Rwanda. Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education, 9(3), 961–976. https://doi.org/10.59765/67grp4

Rianti, R., Gunawan, G., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Taufik, M. (2024). The effect of problem-based learning model assisted by PhET simulation on understanding physics concepts. Lensa: Jurnal Kependidikan Fisika, 12(1), 28–43. https://doi.org/10.3394/j-lkf.v12i1.8783

Sam, U. E., & Stephen, U. U. (2025). PhET simulation and gender on students’ academic performance in physics. International Journal of Research in Education and Sustainable Development, 5(5), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15754315

Umiliya, U., Azizahwati, A., & Mahadi, I. (2023). The effectiveness of the application of PhET with inquiry learning model to improve understanding of the concept [Unpublished manuscript]. Science Education, Riau University.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-22

How to Cite

Degorio, D., & Adlaon , M. (2026). Contextualized PhET Simulation-Based Assessment for Enhancing Grade 9 STE Students’ Understanding of Projectile Motion. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1411-1418. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20337490

Similar Articles

171-180 of 271

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.