Unpacking Mathematics Reception and Problem-Solving Competence Among First-Year College Information Technology Students: A Grounded Theory Inquiry

Authors

  • Marilou Z. Lastrollo DepEd, Naga City Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20388858

Keywords:

Mathematics reception, problem-solving competence, grounded theory, mathematics anxiety, adaptive learning strategies, Information Technology students

Abstract

This study explored the mathematics learning experiences of first-year Bachelor of Science in Information Technology students, focusing on their reception toward mathematics, problem-solving competence, challenges encountered, coping strategies, and the grounded theoretical explanation emerging from their responses. A qualitative grounded theory design was used, involving twenty (20) first-year BSIT students enrolled in Discrete Mathematics/Structures I at a university in the Bicol Region, Naga City, Philippines. Data were gathered through a researcher-made structured open-ended questionnaire and analyzed using grounded theory procedures, including open coding, axial coding, selective coding, constant comparison, and theoretical saturation. The analysis generated 168 significant statements, 32 initial codes, and 8 conceptual categories, which were integrated into the core category Adaptive Mathematical Engagement. Findings revealed that students initially experienced mathematics anxiety, fear, confusion, low confidence, and conceptual difficulty, particularly in algebraic operations and word problem interpretation. However, peer collaboration, teacher guidance, repeated practice, and digital learning strategies helped students gradually build understanding, confidence, and problem-solving competence. The study concludes that mathematical competence develops through a continuous interaction of emotional adjustment, cognitive struggle, social mediation, instructional scaffolding, and self-regulated learning. The findings imply that mathematics instruction for first-year IT students should be anxiety-sensitive, scaffolded, collaborative, and connected to students’ program-related learning contexts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Flick, U. (2014). An introduction to qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine Publishing Company.

Hiebert, J., & Grouws, D. A. (2007). The effects of classroom mathematics teaching on students’ learning. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (Vol. 1, pp. 371–404). Information Age Publishing.

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I): What students know and can do. OECD Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

Skemp, R. R. (1987). The psychology of learning mathematics. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-26

How to Cite

Lastrollo, M. (2026). Unpacking Mathematics Reception and Problem-Solving Competence Among First-Year College Information Technology Students: A Grounded Theory Inquiry. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(5), 1625-1632. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20388858

Similar Articles

91-100 of 314

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.