Makinig Naman Kayo: Teachers’ Frustrations and Perceived Gaps in the Implementation of GAD-Related Policies in Elementary Schools

Authors

  • Al John U. Febrero Dr. Gloria D. Lacson Foundation Colleges Inc. Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20492397

Keywords:

policy implementation, gender equity, inclusivity in schools, GAD gaps

Abstract

Gender and Development (GAD) policies were institutionalized in Philippine schools to promote inclusivity, equity, and protection from gender-based discrimination. This qualitative research explored the lived experiences of elementary teachers in implementing GAD policies within the school system. Using semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis, the study revealed recurring frustrations among teachers such as inadequate training on GAD principles, limited allocation and unclear utilization of GAD funds, and the lack of concrete guidelines for addressing violations involving learners, teachers, and parents. Findings further highlighted the gap between policy directives and actual school practices, where GAD activities are often reduced to compliance-driven events rather than sustained, meaningful initiatives. Teachers also expressed challenges in gaining administrative support, encountering resistance from parents with traditional gender beliefs, and balancing the policy’s goals with existing academic demands. Despite these frustrations, educators showed a strong commitment to fostering inclusivity and equity, provided that sufficient support, clear implementation mechanisms, and responsive interventions are put in place. The study underscores the importance of capacity-building programs, transparent fund utilization, active collaboration with stakeholders, and accountability measures to strengthen the implementation of GAD-related policies. Ultimately, the research calls for a more participatory, consistent, and context-sensitive approach to ensure that GAD integration in schools fulfills its intended role of promoting gender fairness, respect, and protection for all.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agsalog, M. P., & Reyes, C. D. (2023). Mainstreaming gender responsiveness in Philippine basic education: Challenges and policy directions. Philippine Social Science Review, 75(2), 112–128.

Alavanza, C. M., & Ramos, P. J. (2022). Bridging the gap: Integrating gender concepts in Philippine basic education through contextualized lesson exemplars. Philippine Journal of Education Studies, 18(2), 56–72.

Cabrera, L. M. (2021). Participatory planning and transparency in gender and development programs in Philippine public schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 7(2), 87–101.

Castillo, L. A., & Go, M. T. (2022). Bridging policy and practice: Teachers’ experiences in implementing gender-responsive education in Philippine schools. Philippine Journal of Educational Policy Studies, 9(1), 45–61.

Cruz, L. M., & Dela Peña, M. (2023). Gender responsiveness in Philippine classrooms: The missing link in teacher training. Journal of Education and Development Studies, 12(2), 77–93.

David, R. J., & Medina, F. P. (2020). Transparency, accountability, and participatory governance in school-based management. Asia Pacific Education Review, 21(3), 327–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-020-09632-y

Dela Cruz, L. P. (2022). Mainstreaming gender in Philippine public schools: Leadership, accountability, and teacher empowerment. Philippine Journal of Gender Studies, 18(1), 45–63.

Delos Reyes, J. (2022). Monitoring GAD implementation in basic education: From documentation to transformation [Master's thesis/Doctoral dissertation]. University of the Philippines Open University Graduate Studies Repository.

Department of Education – Division of Cagayan de Oro City. (2023). Perceived level of effectiveness of Gender and Development (GAD) program of schools in the Division of Cagayan de Oro City (Research Report). e-Saliksik. https://e-saliksik.deped.gov.ph

Department of Education. (2011). Guidelines in the preparation of the Gender and Development (GAD) Plan, utilization, and monitoring of GAD funds (DepEd Order No. 63, s. 2011).

Department of Education. (2012a). Child protection policy (DepEd Order No. 40, s. 2012).

Department of Education. (2012b). Guidelines on the preparation of Gender and Development (GAD) plans, utilization of GAD budgets and submission of accomplishment reports (DepEd Order No. 63, s. 2012).

Department of Education. (2015a). Guidelines on the implementation of Gender and Development (GAD) programs and activities in schools (DepEd Memorandum No. 114, s. 2015).

Department of Education. (2015b). Promoting gender-fair education in the basic education curriculum (DepEd Order No. 12, s. 2015).

Department of Education. (2016). Implementing guidelines on the School-Based Management (SBM) Framework and standards (DepEd Order No. 43, s. 2016).

Department of Education. (2017a). Gender-responsive basic education policy (DepEd Order No. 32, s. 2017).

Department of Education. (2017b). Guidelines on gender and development (GAD) planning and budgeting (DepEd Memorandum No. 32, s. 2017).

Department of Education. (2017c). Guidelines on the use of gender and development (GAD) budget in DepEd (DepEd Order No. 16, s. 2017).

Department of Education. (2019a). Capacity building activities on Gender and Development (DepEd Memorandum No. 144, s. 2019).

Department of Education. (2019b). Guidelines on the conduct of Gender and Development (GAD) activities (DepEd Memorandum No. 114, s. 2019).

Department of Education. (2019c). Guidelines on gender-responsive basic education (DepEd Order No. 27, s. 2019).

Department of Education. (2019d). Promoting gender fair education and eliminating gender bias in learning resources (DepEd Memorandum No. 273, s. 2019).

Department of Education. (2019e). Strengthening the Gender and Development (GAD) Focal Point System in the Department of Education (DepEd Memorandum No. 144, s. 2019).

Department of Education. (2020). Policy contextualization and localization framework (DepEd Memorandum No. 114, s. 2020).

Department of Education. (2021). Strengthening evidence-based GAD monitoring and evaluation (DepEd Memorandum No. 152, s. 2021).

Department of Education. (2023a). Implementing guidelines on the monitoring, evaluation, and reporting of programs and projects (DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2023).

Department of Education. (2023b). Implementing guidelines on the school budget management cycle (DepEd Order No. 13, s. 2023).

Diehl, D. K. (2023). An integrated framework for studying how schools respond to policy pressures. Educational Researcher. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231159599

Dizon, K., & Macaraig, R. (2023). Challenges in translating gender policies into classroom practice. Journal of Educational Policy Studies, 15(3), 77–92.

Galang, J. R., & Reyes, M. L. (2020). Teacher workload and the limits of gender-responsive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(6), 589–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1476598

Garcia, L. (2022). Assessing the utilization of GAD funds in public schools: Issues and prospects. University of Batangas Graduate Research Journalexport, 11(1), 56–71.

Hemillan-Sacro, J., Bauyot, M. F. M., & Villegas, J. P. (2022). Gender mainstreaming in basic education of the City of Mati, Southern Mindanao, Philippines. Davao Research Journal, 13(1), 30–49. https://doi.org/10.59120/drj.v13i1.3

Hernando, J. D., & Sarmiento, R. P. (2020). Gender mainstreaming and teacher participation in Philippine public schools: Examining implementation gaps. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 7(1), 32–40.

Magtibay, L., & Alinsunod, E. (2022). Beyond activities: Assessing outcome-based gender and development programs in basic education. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Science Research, 8(1), 33–52.

Medina, R. P., & Esteban, M. C. (2021). Cultural barriers in implementing gender equality in Philippine schools. International Journal of Humanities and Education Research, 9(2), 56–72.

Tolentino, R. F., & Manalo, E. G. (2022). Teaching gender sensitivity in basic education: Navigating cultural taboos and policy gaps. International Journal of Educational Research and Innovation, 19(4), 189–207.

UNESCO. (2020). Gender-responsive pedagogy toolkit: Teachers, schools and curriculum developers. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://www.ungei.org/publication/gender-responsive-pedagogy-toolkit

UNESCO. (2021). Promoting gender equality in education: Institutional approaches and good practices. UNESCO Publishing.

UNESCO. (2023). Transforming education for gender equality: Global education monitoring report. UNESCO Publishing.

UNGEI. (2021). Spending better for gender equality in education: Research report. United Nations Girls’ Education Initiative. https://www.ungei.org/publications/spending-better-gender-equality-education

Villaflor, J., & Castro, M. (2021). Participatory approaches in GAD budgeting among public schools in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Public Administration, 65(2), 101–118.

Villanueva, M. C., & Tindowen, D. J. (2021). Teachers’ perspectives on gender mainstreaming and challenges in GAD policy implementation. International Journal of Humanities and Social Development Research, 5(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.30546/2523-4331.2021.5.1.43

Wijanarko, S., Nurlaela, L., Maspiyah, & Rijanto, T. (2022). Teachers’ perception of gender on gender-responsive learning in the vocational school of tourism. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 4(1), 11–18. https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/ijevs/article/view/5508/pdf

Downloads

Published

2026-06-01

How to Cite

Febrero, A. J. (2026). Makinig Naman Kayo: Teachers’ Frustrations and Perceived Gaps in the Implementation of GAD-Related Policies in Elementary Schools. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 144-158. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20492397

Similar Articles

1-10 of 226

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.