Awareness and Availment of Legal Services on Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries

Authors

  • Hayly Jane A. Romanillos Camiguin Polytechnic State College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20619071

Keywords:

agrarian reform beneficiaries, availment, Camiguin Province, land tenure security, legal assistance services, legal awareness

Abstract

This study assessed the awareness and availment of legal assistance services among agrarian reform beneficiaries (ARBs) and tenants in Camiguin Province. It employed a quantitative descriptive-survey design and gathered data from 335 respondents selected from a population of 2,031 ARBs and tenants across Mambajao, Mahinog, Guinsiliban, Sagay, and Catarman using Slovin’s formula at a 95% confidence level and a 5% margin of error. A modified survey questionnaire based on the Department of Agrarian Reform evaluation tool was used. The instrument underwent expert validation and pilot testing, obtaining a Cronbach’s alpha coefficient of 0.7089. Frequency counts, percentages, weighted means, standard deviations, and one-way analysis of variance were applied. The respondents demonstrated a moderate extent of awareness of legal assistance services (M = 3.15, SD = 0.77) and a moderate extent of availment (M = 3.17, SD = 0.76). Awareness was highest for legal advice regarding Certificate of Land Ownership Award concerns, the location of DAR offices, and support for CLOA cancellation or transfer. Availment was highest for legal advice on land titles, protection against illegal eviction or harassment, free legal assistance, and complaint-filing procedures. No significant differences were found in awareness or availment when respondents were grouped according to age, household size, sharing scheme, or source of income. The findings indicate that DAR legal services were recognized and utilized by beneficiaries, although procedural knowledge and the use of specialized services can still be improved. A targeted action plan emphasizing legal literacy, mediation awareness, complaint-filing guidance, CLOA-related information, and community-based outreach was proposed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adam, J. (2013). Land reform, dispossession and new elites: A case study on coconut plantations in Davao Oriental, Philippines. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 54(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12011

Adamopoulos, T., & Restuccia, D. (2014). Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data (Working Paper No. 525). University of Toronto, Department of Economics. https://www.economics.utoronto.ca/public/workingPapers/tecipa-525.pdf

Adams, M. (1995). Land reform: New seeds on old grounds. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/search.do?recordID=GB9617750

Albertus, M. (2015). Autocracy and redistribution: The politics of land reform. Cambridge University Press.

Asian NGO Coalition for Agrarian Reform and Rural Development. (2019). Land rights and agrarian reform monitoring report. ANGOC.

Balisacan, A. M. (2007). Agrarian reform and poverty reduction in the Philippines. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/241061667_Agrarian_Reform_and_Poverty_Reduction_in_the_Philippines

Ballesteros, M. M., Ancheta, J., & Ramos, T. P. (2017). The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program after 30 years: Accomplishments and forward options. Philippine Institute for Development Studies. https://pids.gov.ph

Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2018). Land tenure reform and redistributive justice in agrarian societies: Lessons from the Philippines. Journal of Agrarian Change, 18(1), 125–147.

Bresciani, F., & Ballesteros, M. (2008). Land rental market activity in agrarian reform areas: Evidence from the Philippines. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.

Claudio, L. J. (2020). Assessing legal support services under the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP). Philippine Journal of Public Policy, 32(2), 77–98.

Department of Agrarian Reform. (n.d.-a). Official website. Government of the Philippines. https://www.dar.gov.ph

Department of Agrarian Reform. (n.d.-b). Legal affairs and agrarian justice services. https://www.dar.gov.ph

Department of Agrarian Reform. (2021). Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program accomplishments report.

Department of Agrarian Reform. (2023). Legal Assistance Division: Agrarian justice delivery accomplishments. DAR Official Website.

Gonzales, R. A. (2019). Challenges in implementing agrarian justice delivery under CARPER: The case of land tenure disputes in Mindanao. Asian Journal of Rural Development Studies, 11(3), 45–62.

Hall, R., Hornby, D., Lawry, S., Leopold, A., Mtero, F., & Samii, C. (2012). The impact of land property rights interventions on agricultural productivity in developing countries: A systematic review protocol. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 8(1), 1–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/CL2.91

Lanzona, L. A. (2019). Agrarian reform and democracy: Lessons from the Philippine experience. Millennial Asia, 10(3), 272–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399619879866

Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2018). Agrarian reform and rural development in the Philippines: Policy insights and challenges. PIDS.

Quitoriano, E. (2017). The evolution of agrarian reform in the Philippines: From redistribution to sustainability. Agricultural Policy Review, 24(1), 55–70.

Republic Act No. 6657. (1988). Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law of 1988. Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

Republic Act No. 9700. (2009). An act strengthening the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP), extending the acquisition and distribution of all agricultural lands, instituting reforms, and amending for the purpose certain provisions thereof (CARPER). Official Gazette of the Republic of the Philippines.

Tadem, E. C. (2016, June 19). Can Duterte fix agrarian reform? Philippine Daily Inquirer. http://opinion.inquirer.net/95277/can-duterte-fix-agrarian-reform

Tai, H. C. (1974). Land reform and politics: A comparative analysis. University of California Press.

World Bank. (2009). Land reform, rural development, and poverty in the Philippines: Revisiting the agenda.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-10

How to Cite

Romanillos, H. J. (2026). Awareness and Availment of Legal Services on Agrarian Reform Beneficiaries. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 734-742. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20619071

Similar Articles

31-40 of 149

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.