Basic Education Learners' Digital Literacy and Their Perceptions of English-Speaking Ability

Authors

  • Ma. Elaiza A. Alibiano The Rizal Memorial Colleges, Inc., Davao City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20685304

Keywords:

digital literacy, English-speaking ability, communicative competence, basic education learners, ICT integration, online collaboration

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between digital literacy and basic education learners' perceptions of their English-speaking ability. A quantitative correlational research design was used. The respondents were 316 learners from Grades 7 to 12 enrolled at a private school in Davao City during School Year 2025-2026. Stratified random sampling was employed, and an adapted structured questionnaire was administered after expert validation and pilot testing with 20 learners who were excluded from the final sample. The instrument obtained a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of .844. Descriptive statistics, Pearson product-moment correlation, and multiple linear regression were analyzed using JASP. Results showed that the learners generally demonstrated moderately extensive digital literacy. Online collaborative engagement obtained the highest dimension mean (M = 3.66), whereas the evaluation of credible online language resources obtained the lowest (M = 3.25). Learners perceived their English-speaking ability as generally extensive (M = 3.62). Fluency and coherence obtained the highest mean (M = 4.00), while appropriate vocabulary usage obtained the lowest (M = 3.31). Digital literacy was strongly and positively related to perceived English-speaking ability, r = .734, p < .001. The reported regression model was statistically significant, F(4, 311) = 77.357, p < .001, explaining 49.9% of the variance in perceived English-speaking ability. The findings indicate that technology-enhanced English instruction should strengthen digital-resource evaluation, contextual vocabulary use, and meaningful online collaboration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Khresheh, M. H., Demirkol Orak, S., & Alruwaili, S. F. (2025). The development of language proficiency through global skills enhancement using Web 2.0 tools in university EFL contexts: A mixed-methods quasi-experimental study. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 931.

Al-Senafi, B. (2024). EFL students' use of online platforms for language learning and communication. World Journal of Education, 14(4), 35-48.

Boonyopakorn, J., Tasatanattakool, P., Nilsook, P., & Wannapiroon, P. (2024). Mobile language learning: A digital approach to improving English communication. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 18(22), 159-173.

Cao, H., Xiao, X., & Yao, C. (2024). Improving EFL learners' self-confidence in English-speaking performance with World Englishes teaching. English Today, 40(4), 283-293.

Deiniatur, M. (2024). Digital literacy practices of novice English as a foreign language teachers in writing research articles for publication. Journal of Education and Learning, 18(1), 165-172.

Kulju, P., et al. (2024). Pre-service teachers' evaluation and justification of online educational texts' credibility. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1451002.

Kulsum, E. M., Jamjami, A. Y., Uyun, A. S., & Widianingsih, A. W. S. (2025). A study on the difficulties in English speaking for EFL students. Journal on Education, 7(2), 10648-10659.

Li, F., Cheng, L., Wang, X., Shen, L., Ma, Y., Islam, A. Y. M. A., et al. (2025). The causal relationship between digital literacy and students' academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 108.

Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. Ritchie & T. K. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). Academic Press.

Ma, M., Noordin, N., & Razali, A. B. (2025). Improving EFL speaking performance among undergraduate students with an AI-powered mobile app in after-class assignments: An empirical investigation. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 370.

Ng, W. (2020). Can we teach digital natives’ digital literacy? Computers & Education, 59(3), 1065-1078.

Nguyen, L. A. T. (2025). Digital literacy of English majors: Subjective versus objective measurement. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Panyathikul, W., Poopatwiboon, S., & Phusawisot, P. (2024). Improving EFL secondary learners' pronunciation through multimodal teaching. Journal of Education and Learning, 14(1), 148-160.

Pattiasina, P. J., Muhammadiah, M., Khasanah, H., & Pirdaus, A. (2021). The relevance of speaking skills with improving digital literacy skills. International Research Journal of Management, IT & Social Sciences, 8(6), 669-678.

Phuong Quynh, N. H. (2024). Enhancing fluency in speaking through task-based teaching and learning. Journal of Ecohumanism, 3(8), 2307-2326.

Rafique, S., Waqas, A., & Shahid, C. (2023). The correlation between vocabulary knowledge and English language proficiency at undergraduate level. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(2), 1132-1141.

Shadiev, R., & Wang, X. (2022). A review of research on technology-supported language learning and 21st-century skills. Frontiers in Psychology.

Siddiq, F., Hatlevik, O. E., Olsen, R. V., Throndsen, I., & Scherer, R. (2019). Taking a future perspective by learning from the past: A systematic review of assessment instruments that aim to measure primary and secondary school students' ICT literacy. Educational Research Review, 28, Article 100289.

Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 2(1), 3-10.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14

How to Cite

Alibiano, M. E. (2026). Basic Education Learners’ Digital Literacy and Their Perceptions of English-Speaking Ability. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1014-1020. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20685304

Similar Articles

11-20 of 383

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.