Poverty Status Differentiation in Central Philippines: A Discriminant Analysis of Household Characteristics

Authors

  • Julhusin B. Jalisan Negros Oriental State University, Bais Campus, Bais City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20726296

Keywords:

poverty status, discriminant analysis, household characteristics, classification model, Central Philippines

Abstract

One of the most intractable socioeconomic issues in Central Philippines is poverty, and a significant number of Filipino households are currently falling below the officially declared poverty line. Although several factors have already been identified as causally linked to poverty in existing studies, these works typically use descriptive analyses and regression techniques-methods capable of determining interrelationships but not of accurately identifying poor households. To bridge this gap, the current study utilized discriminant function analysis to develop a classification model which determines the discriminating attributes that can distinguish poor from non-poor households in Central Philippines. Based on data derived from the 2024 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES), 1,875,723 total households were studied. The selected socioeconomic attributes investigated include the age of household head, level of education achieved, number of household members, number of income earners and household food expenditure percentage. Analysis reveals that all variables selected are highly significant for classification: the percent household food expenditures (β= 0.555) and the educational attainment of the household head (β= 0.449) are the most potent ones. Classification of the household members resulted in 75.8% overall accuracy. The model classified correctly 76.5% of poor households and 74.9% of non-poor households. In essence, observable characteristics of households were able to predict their classification in terms of poverty, even in the absence of actual income data. These findings could aid the government and other policymakers in a more appropriate allocation of their limited resources for poverty reduction interventions and social protection programs.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Khe, N. D., Eriksson, B., Phuong, D. T., Höjer, B., & Diwan, V. K. (2003). Faces of poverty: Sensitivity and specificity of economic classifications in rural Vietnam. Journal of Health, Population, and Nutrition, 21(4), 346–355.

Laes, E. (2010). Measuring poverty: Concepts and methods. Social Indicators Research, 97(3), 373–398. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9505-2

Microsoft Corporation. (2002). MegaStat [Add-in module for Microsoft Excel]. https://www.megastat.com

Nasution, A. H., Bangun, N., & Sitepu, R. B. (2018). Factors that affect poverty areas in North Sumatra. International Journal of Economic Research, 15(2), 145–158.

Philippine Institute for Development Studies. (2025). Socioeconomic determinants of poverty in the Philippines. https://pids.gov.ph/publications/research-reports

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2024). 2024 Family Income and Expenditure Survey (FIES) results. https://psa.gov.ph/fies

Santoso, S. (2010). Multivariate statistical methods: Discriminant and cluster analysis. PT Elex Media Komputindo.

United Nations Development Programme. (2004). Poverty, education and work in Armenia: A household survey analysis. https://hdr.undp.org/content/poverty-education-and-work-armenia

Downloads

Published

2026-06-17

How to Cite

Jalisan, J. (2026). Poverty Status Differentiation in Central Philippines: A Discriminant Analysis of Household Characteristics. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1176-1185. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20726296

Similar Articles

11-20 of 396

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.