Difficulties Encountered by Student Leaders in the New Normal: Basis for a Leadership Enhancement Program

Authors

  • John Michael Edejer Department of Education, Schools Division Office of Zambales, Region III, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20760660

Keywords:

leadership enhancement, new normal education, student leaders, Supreme Student Government, youth formation, pandemic leadership

Abstract

This study determined the difficulties encountered by Supreme Student Government officers in the new normal and used the findings as basis for a leadership enhancement program. A descriptive research design was employed among 91 Supreme Student Government officers from one medium-sized Schools Division in Region III during School Year 2021-2022. The study described respondents according to age, sex, school category, and average monthly family income; assessed their difficulties in knowledge, ability, and attitude; and tested whether significant differences existed across respondent groups. Data were gathered using a researcher-made questionnaire validated by three experts with an excellent validity rating of 4.81 and a reliability index of .967. Frequency, percentage, weighted mean, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis H test were used in the analysis. Findings showed that most respondents were younger learners, female, from medium schools, and from families with higher monthly income. Overall, student leaders experienced a high level of difficulty in knowledge (M = 3.64), ability (M = 3.57), and attitude (M = 3.53). The most difficult areas were planning and creating the General Plan of Action, using accessible platforms for smooth delivery of programs, and managing time and energy in the new normal. No significant differences were found when difficulties were grouped by age, sex, school category, and family income. The study concludes that student leaders shared similar leadership challenges during the pandemic regardless of profile. A leadership enhancement program focused on digital leadership, online program planning, time management, communication, and youth-formation support is recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alchemer. (2021). Purposive sampling 101. https://www.alchemer.com/resources/blog/purposive-sampling-101/

Asghar, M. Z., et al. (2021). The shift of education to virtual learning environments during the COVID-19 pandemic. [Publication details require verification].

Baporikar, N. (2022). Difficulty and challenge in learning and organizational contexts. [Publication details require verification].

Baylor. (2014). Frequency distribution and percentage analysis in categorical data. [Publication details require verification].

Bishop Tyrrell Anglican College. (n.d.). Why student leadership is important in education. https://www.btac.nsw.edu.au/news/test-article

Buthmann, A. (2019). Statistical significance and p-value interpretation. [Publication details require verification].

Calmorin, L. P. (2016). Research and thesis writing with statistics. National Book Store.

Damiani, J., & Wieczorek, D. (2017). Managing the ebb and flow: A case for calling forth student voice. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 2(1), 8-17.

Department of Education. (2020). Youth leaders step-up initiatives to assist fellow learners in the new normal. https://www.deped.gov.ph/2020/09/27/youth-leaders-step-up-initiatives-to-assist-fellow-learners-in-the-new-normal/

Department of Education. (2021). Recommended programs, projects, and activities of the student government for school year 2021-2022. Department of Education.

Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2015). The psychology of attitudes. [Publication details require verification].

Garcia, E., & Weiss, E. (2020). COVID-19 and student performance, equity, and U.S. education policy. Economic Policy Institute.

Good, C. V., & Scates, D. E. (1972). Methods of research: Educational, psychological, sociological. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Hernando-Malipot, M. (2021). DepEd further capacitates student-leaders amid distance learning setup. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/05/21/deped-further-capacitates-student-leaders-amid-distance-learning-setup/

Hernando-Malipot, M. (2021). Filipino students represent PH in Asia Student Leadership Conference 2021. Manila Bulletin. https://mb.com.ph/2021/08/16/look-filipino-students-represent-ph-in-asia-student-leadership-conference-2021/

Johnson, S. (n.d.). Student leadership in the COVID-19 pandemic. Milton Hershey School. https://www.mhskids.org/news/student-leadership-in-the-covid-19-pandemic/

Kerby, D. S. (2015). The simple difference formula: An approach to teaching nonparametric correlation. Comprehensive Psychology, 3, 11.IT.3.1.

Kimura, N., & Farrer, J. (2020). Online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: Social interaction and its impacts on student satisfaction. Academia.edu.

Kutat, R., Cayaon, C., Colis, I., & Jagmis, M. G. (2021). Student satisfaction survey on Student Affairs and Services programs of Western Philippines University. European Journal of Research Development and Sustainability, 2(9), 1-11.

Lituañas, C. R., Boiser, F., Reginales, J., Cruspero, E., Obo, S., Garcia, L. A., & Pedrosa, M. (2021). An outlook of Catholic religious youth organizations in the time of pandemic: A case of the Student Catholic Action of the Philippines. DLSU Arts Congress Proceedings, 5.

Lucero, R. (2021). Students' satisfaction on the Supreme Student Government services: Basis for action plan. Global Journal of Research Publication, 17-22.

Medina, A. (2021). What you learn by being a student leader. Lifestyle Inquirer. https://lifestyle.inquirer.net/379515/what-you-learn-by-being-a-student-leader/

O'Scanaill, M. (2021). 5 ways to promote student leadership. DyKnow. https://www.dyknow.com/blog/5-ways-to-promote-student-leadership/

Perkins, D. (2007). Theory of difficulty. [Publication details require verification].

Poltorak, M. (2020). Lessons from a student leader during a global pandemic and beyond. Pearson.

Siscar, L., & Ojales, W. (2021). Developing leadership potentials of Supreme Pupil Government in public elementary schools. IOER International Multidisciplinary Research Journal.

Sriwiyanti, Saefudin, W., & Yusoff, S. H. M. (2021). Self-efficacy and student engagement in online learning during pandemic. Global Journal of Educational Research and Management, 1(4), 232-244.

Teh, M., Mahumot, M., Cavan, R., & Ojendras, N. R. (2018). Leadership competence of Supreme Student Government officials. University of Bohol Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 6, 1-11.

Than, W. W., & Kyaw, W. H. (2021). School environment, student engagement and educational aspiration of high school students. Academia Letters, Article 1712. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL1712

U.S. Embassy Manila. (2021). U.S. Peace Corps, DSWD train youth leaders to get out-of-school peers back to school. https://ph.usembassy.gov/u-s-peace-corps-dswd-train-youth-leaders-to-get-out-of-school-peers-back-to-school/

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Edejer, J. M. (2026). Difficulties Encountered by Student Leaders in the New Normal: Basis for a Leadership Enhancement Program. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1285-1292. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20760660

Similar Articles

11-20 of 361

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.