Strengthening the Administrative Competencies of Second District Department of Education Leaders Through Professional Development Program

Authors

  • Alejandro M. Godoy World Citi Colleges-Guimba Campus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806136

Keywords:

Administrative Skills, Capacity Enhancement, Competency Development, Institutional Performance, Professional Training, School Leadership, Work Performance

Abstract

The study was conducted to find out the level of competency of 122 administrative officers in the Department of Education’s (DepEd) 2nd District in Cagayan for the academic year 2025-2026. The study used a mixed-method explanatory sequential research design and descriptive statistics such as mean and standard deviation to evaluate competencies in planning and decision-making, leadership and communication, technological literacy, and organizational and resource management through an initial quantitative approach. Quantitative findings indicated that all skill categories were assessed as Proficient. Planning and decision-making obtained an overall mean of 3.136. The best-performing indicators were documenting and communicating plans properly (M=3.213), ensuring operational plans were aligned with organizational objectives (M=3.172), and measuring the effects of actions to enhance future plans (M=3.221). Incorporating key stakeholders in the planning procedures achieved the lowest mean (M = 3.041), yet it remained within the proficient level. The second step was to collect qualitative data to explain and verify the quantitative findings. These findings indicated that while respondents appreciated a structured planning process, they faced problems in stakeholder participation and collaborative decision-making, particularly in ensuring that all voices were heard and valued during the planning stages. The study results show that Administrative Officers are competent in all aspects; however, there is a need for improvement in participative planning techniques and advanced decision-making skills. The report proposes the creation and implementation of specific professional development programs that aim at filling the gaps and improving the administrative competencies and the overall performance of the organization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Hamdan, Z., Banat, A., & Al-Ali, N. (2022). Competency-based professional development and workforce performance. International Journal of Professional Development, 14(2), 45–58.

Armstrong, M. (2021). Armstrong's handbook of performance management: An evidence-based guide to delivering high performance (7th ed.). Kogan Page.

Avalos, B. (2020). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 10–20.

Bedi, K., & Brown, S. (2021). Administrative competencies and school management effectiveness. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(4), 421–436.

Bush, T. (2020). Theories of educational leadership and management (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., & Gardner, M. (2020). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2020). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 56(2), 221–258.

Delos Santos, R., & Ocampo, M. (2021). Leadership and communication competencies among educational administrators. Philippine Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 8(1), 33–48.

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Fullan, M. (2021). Leading in a culture of change (2nd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Guskey, T. R. (2020). Evaluating professional development (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Hallinger, P., & Heck, R. H. (2021). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and learning outcomes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 365–384.

Hobson, A. J. (2021). The role of mentoring and coaching in professional learning. Professional Development in Education, 47(1), 1–15.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2021). Education at a glance 2021: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b35a14e5-en

Republic of the Philippines, Department of Education. (2024). DepEd Order No. 002, s. 2024. Department of Education.

Regañon, R. (2023). Administrative competencies and school effectiveness. Philippine Educational Management Review, 12(1), 15–29.Xx, x., xx, M., Ibadurrahman, I., Renyaan, A. S., & Telaumbanua, E. (2024). Innovative Leadership Strategies For School Principals: Building A Holistic Educational Environment Focused On Student Achievement In The Era Of Technology And Globalization. International Journal Of Teaching And Learning, 2(1), 266-281.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Godoy, A. (2026). Strengthening the Administrative Competencies of Second District Department of Education Leaders Through Professional Development Program. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1366-1371. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806136

Similar Articles

31-40 of 486

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.