Utilization of Ai-Assisted Instruction in Enhancing Mathematics Engagement and Achievement of Senior High School Students

Authors

  • Agnes Morfe Grajo Laguna State Polytechnic University-Siniloan Campus Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806295

Keywords:

AI-assisted instruction, Data and Probability, MathGPT, mathematics achievement, mathematics engagement, Wolfram Alpha

Abstract

This study examined the utilization of AI-assisted instruction in enhancing the mathematics engagement and achievement of Grade 11 senior high school students in Data and Probability. A quasi-experimental pretest-posttest design with partial counterbalancing of instructional conditions was used among 131 students. The study compared traditional instruction, MathGPT-assisted instruction, and Wolfram Alpha-assisted instruction in terms of behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, overall learning experience, mathematics achievement, and perceived usability and accessibility. Mathematics engagement and usability/accessibility were measured using Likert-scale questionnaires, while mathematics achievement was measured through pretest and posttest scores based on six identified competencies. Weighted mean, standard deviation, Friedman test, and paired-samples t-test were used to analyze the data. Results showed that all instructional approaches produced high levels of mathematics engagement. MathGPT obtained the highest behavioral engagement rating (WM = 4.07, SD = 0.80), while Wolfram Alpha obtained the highest emotional engagement rating (WM = 3.93, SD = 0.89). For overall learning experience, MathGPT received the highest weighted mean (WM = 3.97, SD = 0.89), followed by Wolfram Alpha (WM = 3.95, SD = 0.84), and traditional instruction (WM = 3.75). Wolfram Alpha and MathGPT both obtained the highest usability and accessibility rating (WM = 4.03). Paired-samples t-test results indicated significant improvement between pretest and posttest scores across all competencies and treatment groups, with p-values below 0.05. However, the Friedman test showed no significant difference in mathematics engagement among the three instructional approaches, χ²(2) = 2.42, p = 0.299. The study concludes that traditional instruction, MathGPT, and Wolfram Alpha all contributed positively to mathematics engagement and achievement, with AI-assisted instruction showing slight descriptive advantages. An enhanced AI-assisted mathematics instructional plan is proposed to guide responsible, teacher-mediated AI integration in Data and Probability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Algahtani, A. (2024). Factors affecting the effectiveness of artificial intelligence tools in education

Archibald, M., et al. (2023). AI-supported discussion platforms and teacher workload reduction.

Bayaga, A. (2024). AI-driven and gamified learning environments in mathematics education.

Bešlić, I., & Kamber Hamzić, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and personalized learning in elementary mathematics.

Canonigo, M. (2024). AI tools, conceptual understanding, and self-efficacy in mathematics.

Ding, A., et al. (2024). Teacher professional development and AI literacy for classroom practice.

Galamiton, A., & Pasco, R. (2025). Wolfram Alpha, Desmos, academic grit, and performance in general mathematics.

Guler, N., et al. (2024). Accuracy and limitations of ChatGPT in mathematical tasks.

Holman, C., et al. (2025). AI interventions in mathematics education: A systematic review.

Hwang, G. J., & Tu, Y. F. (2021). Roles and research trends of artificial intelligence in mathematics education.

Kim, J. (2024). Teacher-AI collaboration in support of student learning.

Maanu, J., & Larbi, E. (2024). AI-assisted collaborative learning and mathematics performance.

Maanu, J., et al. (2025). AI-supported collaborative learning in mathematics education.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Research Committee. (2024). Responsible artificial intelligence integration in mathematics teaching.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). PISA 2022 results: Philippines mathematics performance. OECD.

Qu, Y., & Ogunkunle, O. (2021). AI-assisted adaptive learning algorithms and personalized learning support.

Ramprakash, R., et al. (2024). ChatGPT support for complex mathematical problems.

Ran, H., et al. (2021). Technology use and mathematics achievement.

Rodrigo, M. M. T., & Talandron-Felipe, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence in under-resourced Philippine learning environments.

Sanchez-Ruiz, L., et al. (2023). ChatGPT in blended-learning mathematics contexts.

Santoianni, F., & Ciasullo, M. (2024). Human-centered AI-based learning systems.

Sykes, A. (2024). Overreliance and academic integrity risks in AI-assisted academic tasks.

Taufikin, M., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence and the changing role of mathematics teachers.

Wang, S., et al. (2024). Artificial intelligence in education: Adaptive systems, feedback, and learner analytics.

Wardat, Y., et al. (2023). ChatGPT as a teaching and learning tool for mathematics.

Zhai, X. (2024). Educator roles in generative AI integration.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

How to Cite

Grajo, A. M. (2026). Utilization of Ai-Assisted Instruction in Enhancing Mathematics Engagement and Achievement of Senior High School Students. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1380-1387. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20806295

Similar Articles

41-50 of 488

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.