Greening the Future: Cultivating Ecological Consciousness and Praxis in Science Pre-Service Teachers through Photovoice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21057086Keywords:
ecological consciousness, ecopedagogical continuum, ecopedagogy, photovoice, pre-service teachers, sustainability education, teacher education, transformative praxisAbstract
Amid intensifying ecological challenges, teacher education is tasked with cultivating ecological consciousness that goes beyond awareness toward critical and transformative engagement. Grounded in ecopedagogy and critical pedagogy, this study examines how science pre-service teachers perceive, interpret, and respond to environmental issues through Photovoice. This qualitative research engaged 15 third-year science pre-service teachers from a teacher education institution in Pangasinan, Philippines, during the First Semester of SY 2025-2026. Participants documented local environmental realities through Photovoice and engaged in guided reflection using the SHOWED technique. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Five interrelated orientations emerged: affective–instrumental engagement, critical ecological literacy, relational and planetary consciousness, constructive hope and regenerative imagination, and praxis through an emerging eco-teacher identity. These are synthesized in the Ecopedagogical Continuum of Ecological Consciousness (ECEC) Model, which conceptualizes ecological consciousness as a dynamic, recursive, and non-linear process. The study’s key contribution lies in demonstrating that ecological consciousness is present but unevenly developed and partially depoliticized. Participants demonstrate strong connection, awareness, and willingness to act, yet their perspectives remain largely individualized and only partially connected to broader ecological and systemic contexts. The ECEC Model is proposed as a conceptual, diagnostic, and pedagogical framework for understanding ecological consciousness as a process in formation and highlights the need to scaffold toward structurally informed and transformative ecological praxis.
Downloads
References
André, D. (2025). Critical Pedagogy for a Sustainable Future: Investigating Paulo Freire’s Influence on Education for Sustainable Development. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-548798
Bercasio, R. R. O., & Remolacio, L. K. Q. (2022). Mainstreaming environmental education in the teacher education curriculum in the Philippines. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(3), 1552–1552. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.21748
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676x.2019.1628806
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Brock, A., Williams, I. D., & Kemp, S. (2023). “I’ll take the easiest option please”. Carbon reduction preferences of the public. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton), 429, 139398–139398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139398
Canlas, I. P., & Karpudewan, M. (2021). Teaching and environmentalism: a deduction from values, beliefs and norms in teaching disaster risk reduction in science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 41(3), 961–982. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1978421
Congress of the Philippines. (2008). Republic Act No. 9512: National Environmental Awareness and Education Act of 2008. Retrieved from: https://lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2008/ra_9512_2008.html
Favor, C. C. (2026). Preparing Environmentally Responsive Teachers: Ecological Literacy of Preservice Teachers in a Climate-Vulnerable Coastal Community. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 7(2), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v7i2.163
Freiré, P. (1968). Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 30th Anniversary Edition. In Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). Hôpital Rivière-des-Prairies. https://eduq.info/xmlui/handle/11515/35849
Gadotti, M. (2011). Adult education as a human right: The Latin American context and the ecopedagogic perspective. International Review of Education, 57, 9–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9205-0
Groot, B., Schrijver, J., & Abma, T. (2021). Are you afraid of press and social media? Ethics in photovoice in participatory health research. Educational Action Research, 31(3), 556–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2021.1941164
Kahn, R. (2010). Critical Pedagogy, Ecoliteracy, and Planetary Crisis: The Ecopedagogy Movement. http://bvbr.bib-bvb.de:8991/F?func=service&doc_library=BVB01&local_base=BVB01&doc_number=018763475&sequence=000001&line_number=0001&func_code=DB_RECORDS&service_type=MEDIA
Korsant, C. (2022). A Freirean ecopedagogy or an imposition of values? The pluriverse and the politics of environmental education. Globalizations, 21(2), 370–387. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2022.2038830
Liebenberg, L. (2018). Thinking Critically About Photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918757631
Misiaszek, G. W. (2016). Ecopedagogy as an element of citizenship education: The dialectic of global/local spheres of citizenship and critical environmental pedagogies. International Review of Education, 62(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9587-0
Misiaszek, G. W. (2022). Ecopedagogy: Critical Environmental Pedagogies to Disrupt Falsely Touted Sustainable Development (pp. 301–317). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86343-2_17
Müller, I. (2023). Photovoice methodology to promote education for sustainable development. South African Journal of Higher Education, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.20853/37-2-5284
Ojala, M. (2012). Hope and climate change: the importance of hope for environmental engagement among young people. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 625–642. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.637157
Piras, S., Righi, S., Banchelli, F., Giordano, C., & Setti, M. (2022). Food waste between environmental education, peers, and family influence. Insights from primary school students in Northern Italy. IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia), 383, 135461–135461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.135461
Reimer-Watts, B. K., Abel, E., Coulombe, S., & Riemer, M. (2022). Co-creating cultures of sustainability and co-imagining the teaching green building: the use of a participatory Photovoice process in a HPGB context. Sustainable Earth Reviews, 5(1), 2–2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42055-022-00047-y
Robertson, O., Recido, J. L., & Clarke, L. (2022). Qualitative methods as decolonised pedagogical praxis: Student and educator reflections on embedding photovoice in undergraduate course curricula. QMiP Bulletin, 1(34), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.53841/bpsqmip.2022.1.34.30
Sutton-Brown, C. (2014). Photovoice: A Methodological Guide. Photography and Culture, 7(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.2752/175145214x13999922103165
Versey, H. S. (2024). Photovoice: A Method to Interrogate Positionality and Critical Reflexivity. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2024.5222
Walker, G. (2023). Developing an ecology of disabilities framework: viewing disability inclusively. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 18(2), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/jrit-07-2023-0096
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, Methodology, and Use for Participatory Needs Assessment. Deep Blue (University of Michigan), 24(3), 369–387. https://doi.org/10.1177/109019819702400309
Wheatley, K. F. (2022). Humanity Faces a Global Life Emergency: We Must Start Teaching Teachers and Students About It. Journal of Education and Human Development. https://doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v11n1a1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.