Assessing the Mathematical Proficiency and Critical Problem-Solving Capabilities of Key Stage 3 Students of SDO Iriga City

Authors

  • Alfie T. Gascon Schools Division Office of Iriga City, Department of Education, Iriga City, Philippines Author
  • Jerson V. Toralde Schools Division Office of Iriga City, Department of Education, Iriga City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21066859

Keywords:

mathematical proficiency, critical problem-solving capabilities, Key Stage 3 learners, mathematics achievement, adaptive reasoning, procedural fluency

Abstract

This study assessed the mathematical proficiency and critical problem-solving capabilities of Key Stage 3 learners of the Schools Division Office of Iriga City during School Year 2025-2026 as a diagnostic basis for targeted instructional interventions. A quantitative descriptive-correlational research design was employed. The respondents were 378 Grade 7 to Grade 10 learners selected through stratified random sampling. Data were gathered using validated assessment instruments that measured learners' academic performance in Mathematics, their mathematical proficiency across conceptual understanding, procedural fluency, strategic competence, adaptive reasoning, and productive disposition, and their critical problem-solving capabilities across problem interpretation, strategy formulation, execution and analysis, and evaluation and reflection. Descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance, and correlation analysis were used. Findings showed that most learners were classified under the Proficient (31.7%) and Approaching Proficiency (30.2%) levels based on preceding Mathematics grades. Learners demonstrated a high overall extent of mathematical proficiency (WM = 3.39), with procedural fluency obtaining the highest mean (WM = 3.56) and adaptive reasoning the lowest (WM = 3.21). They also demonstrated a high overall level of critical problem-solving capability (WM = 3.35), with execution and analysis obtaining the highest mean (WM = 3.53) and evaluation and reflection the lowest (WM = 3.17). Significant differences were found in mathematical proficiency and critical problem-solving capabilities when learners were grouped by grade level and preceding Mathematics grade. The study concludes that mathematical proficiency is closely associated with critical problem-solving capability and that interventions should strengthen reasoning, strategic competence, reflection, and differentiated mathematics support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ariyanti, G., & Santoso, F. G. I. (2020). Analysis of mathematics learning outcomes based on students' critical thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1464, Article 012014.

Department of Education. (2016). K to 12 curriculum guide: Mathematics. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2019). PISA 2018 national report of the Philippines. Department of Education.

Department of Education. (2022). National Achievement Test results and mathematics performance report. Department of Education.

Ho, T. M. P. (2020). Measuring conceptual understanding, procedural fluency and integrating procedural and conceptual knowledge in mathematical problem solving. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 8(5), 1334-1350. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v8i05.el02

Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academy Press.

Meilani, A., & Meiliasari. (n.d.). Systematic literature review: Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis peserta didik dalam pembelajaran matematika. https://doi.org/10.37150/ftdz9c29

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.). Student problem solving skills. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/en/topics/problem-solving.html

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). PISA 2018 results: What students know and can do (Vol. I). OECD Publishing.

Polya, G. (1945). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton University Press.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. Academic Press.

Suryawan, I. P. P., Sudiarta, I. G. P., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2023). Students' critical thinking skills in solving mathematical problems: Systematic literature review. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 6(1), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v6i1.56462

Yulian, V., & Wahyudin. (2018). Analysing categories of mathematical proficiency based on Kilpatrick opinion in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1132(1), Article 012052. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1132/1/012052

Methodologies to reveal young Australian Indigenous students' mathematical proficiency. (2023)., 36, 311-338.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Gascon, A., & Toralde, J. (2026). Assessing the Mathematical Proficiency and Critical Problem-Solving Capabilities of Key Stage 3 Students of SDO Iriga City. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(6), 1713-1721. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21066859

Similar Articles

31-40 of 343

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.