Structured Reading Recovery Support and Foundational Literacy Development among Grade 1 Learners

Authors

  • Angelee A. Balubal Northeastern College Author
  • Michelle S. Morales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21425545

Keywords:

assessment-informed instruction, foundational literacy, Grade 1 learners, implementation fidelity, reading intervention, structured reading recovery

Abstract

This study traced the literacy growth of Grade 1 learners who received structured reading recovery support and determined how implementation fidelity shaped their progress across the intervention period. A prospective repeated-measures cohort design with an embedded fidelity component was used. Learners identified through an initial literacy screening completed assessments at baseline, Week 4, Week 8, and Week 12. The assessment package measured phonological awareness, letter-sound correspondence, blending and segmenting, decoding, word recognition, oral reading accuracy, fluency, vocabulary, and basic comprehension. Piecewise linear mixed-effects modeling, estimated marginal means, standardized mean-change effects, and reliable change indices were applied. Results showed substantial improvement in overall foundational literacy, with the strongest gains observed in decoding, blending and segmenting, phonological awareness, and letter-sound correspondence. Growth was faster during the first eight weeks and remained significant, though slower, during the consolidation phase. Higher implementation fidelity was associated with steeper literacy growth, particularly when instructional sequencing, teacher modeling, guided practice, feedback, and review were delivered consistently. Most learners demonstrated reliable improvement, yet many remained below expected benchmarks in fluency, automatic word recognition, and comprehension. The findings indicate that structured reading recovery can strengthen early literacy when support is systematic, assessment-informed, and sustained. Continued intervention cycles, stronger cumulative review, smaller instructional groups, and greater emphasis on oral language, repeated reading, and comprehension were recommended for learners who showed limited response.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Otaiba, S., McMaster, K., Wanzek, J., & Zaru, M. W. (2023). What we know and need to know about literacy interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties and disabilities, including dyslexia. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 313–332. doi:10.1002/rrq.458

Bratsch-Hines, M., Vernon-Feagans, L., Pedonti, S., & Varghese, C. (2020). Differential effects of the Targeted Reading Intervention for students with low phonological awareness and/or vocabulary. Learning Disability Quarterly, 43(4), 214–226. doi:10.1177/0731948719858683

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi:10.1177/1529100618772271

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum: Reading and literacy, Grade 1.

Duke, N. K., & Cartwright, K. B. (2021). The science of reading progresses: Communicating advances beyond the simple view of reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S25–S44. doi:10.1002/rrq.411

Foorman, B., Beyler, N., Borradaile, K., Coyne, M., Denton, C. A., Dimino, J., Furgeson, J., Hayes, L., Henke, J., Justice, L., Keating, B., Lewis, W., Sattar, S., Streke, A., Wagner, R., & Wissel, S. (2016). Foundational skills to support reading for understanding in kindergarten through 3rd grade (NCEE 2016-4008). National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Förster, N., Kawohl, E., & Souvignier, E. (2018). Short- and long-term effects of assessment-based differentiated reading instruction in general education on reading fluency and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 56, 98–109. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.04.009

Fuchs, A., Radkowitsch, A., & Sommerhoff, D. (2025). Using learning progress monitoring to promote academic performance? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 46, Article 100648. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100648

Gersten, R., Haymond, K., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., & Jayanthi, M. (2020). Meta-analysis of the impact of reading interventions for students in the primary grades. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 13(2), 401–427. doi:10.1080/19345747.2019.1689591

Gillon, G., McNeill, B., Scott, A., Arrow, A., Gath, M., & Macfarlane, A. (2023). A better start literacy approach: Effectiveness of Tier 1 and Tier 2 support within a response to teaching framework. Reading and Writing, 36(3), 565–598. doi:10.1007/s11145-022-10303-4

Goldfeld, S., Beatson, R., Watts, A., Snow, P., Gold, L., Le, H. N. D., Edwards, S., Connell, J., Stark, H., Shingles, B., Barnett, T., Quach, J., & Eadie, P. (2022). Tier 2 oral language and early reading interventions for preschool to Grade 2 children: A restricted systematic review. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 27(1), 65–113. doi:10.1080/19404158.2021.2011754

Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312. doi:10.1002/rrq.477

Hudson, A., Koh, P. W., Moore, K. A., & Binks-Cantrell, E. (2020). Fluency interventions for elementary students with reading difficulties: A synthesis of research from 2000–2019. Education Sciences, 10(3), Article 52. doi:10.3390/educsci10030052

Jiménez, J. E., Gutiérrez, N., & de León, S. C. (2021). Analyzing the role of fidelity of RTI Tier 2 reading intervention in Spanish kindergarten and first grade students. Annals of Dyslexia, 71(1), 28–49. doi:10.1007/s11881-021-00221-5

Kim, Y.-S. G. (2017). Why the simple view of reading is not simplistic: Unpacking component skills of reading using a direct and indirect effect model of reading (DIER). Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(4), 310–333. doi:10.1080/10888438.2017.1291643

Lervåg, A., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2018). Unpicking the developmental relationship between oral language skills and reading comprehension: It’s simple, but complex. Child Development, 89(5), 1821–1838. doi:10.1111/cdev.12861

Lovett, M. W., Frijters, J. C., Wolf, M., Steinbach, K. A., Sevcik, R. A., & Morris, R. D. (2017). Early intervention for children at risk for reading disabilities: The impact of grade at intervention and individual differences on intervention outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 889–914. doi:10.1037/edu0000181

Nilvius, C., Carlsson, R., Fälth, L., & Nordström, T. (2021). Tier 2 interventions within the RtI-model for developing students’ word decoding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 8(1), Article 1994105. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2021.1994105

Wanzek, J., Stevens, E. A., Williams, K. J., Scammacca, N., Vaughn, S., & Sargent, K. (2018). Current evidence on the effects of intensive early reading interventions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 51(6), 612–624. doi:10.1177/0022219418775110

World Bank, & UNESCO Institute for Statistics. (2024, April). Philippines learning poverty brief (Version 2). World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-18

How to Cite

Balubal, A., & Morales, M. (2026). Structured Reading Recovery Support and Foundational Literacy Development among Grade 1 Learners. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(7), 1212-1222. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21425545

Similar Articles

21-30 of 517

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>