Automated Kalamay Hati Mixer

Authors

  • Novee Gen M. Bayog University of Southern Mindanao - Kidapawan City Campus, Kidapawan City, Philippines Author
  • Josephine G. Gonzaga University of Southern Mindanao - Kidapawan City Campus, Kidapawan City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21615979

Keywords:

automated mixer, Kalamay Hati, food processing technology, mechanical design, workability, product development

Abstract

This study designed, constructed, tested, and evaluated an Automated Kalamay Hati Mixer intended to reduce the physical demands and process variability associated with continuous manual stirring. A project-development design was combined with a descriptive quantitative evaluation. The machine used a 1.5-horsepower motor, gear-and-pulley transmission, Magkono wooden paddle, 24-inch aluminum wok, digital timer, and kill switch, with a 10-kilogram batch capacity. Ten recorded production trials assessed time and rotational speed across the slurry, caramelization, and setting phases. Fifty Kalamay Hati makers and vendors in Kidapawan City were purposively selected to evaluate durability, materials, and workability through a validated five-point checklist questionnaire. Frequency, percentage, and mode were used for the acceptability data, while phase durations and speeds were summarized from the trial records. Each trial completed the three-phase process in 3 hours and 30 minutes. The slurry phase averaged 42 minutes and 42 seconds at 30 rpm, the caramelization phase averaged 1 hour, 12 minutes, and 39 seconds at 18 rpm, and the setting phase averaged 1 hour, 34 minutes, and 39 seconds at 11 rpm. Nine of ten durability indicators and eight of ten material indicators had a modal rating of Highly Acceptable. Six workability indicators were Highly Acceptable, while the paddle-lifting mechanism and speed shifting received comparatively lower ratings. The completed mixer demonstrated stable phase-specific operation, consistent batch timing, and strong user acceptance. The machine offers a practical food-processing technology for small-scale producers, although improvements in portability, lifting controls, mechanical guarding, wok capacity, and economic feasibility remain necessary before wider deployment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aguilera, J. M. (2020). The food matrix: Implications in processing, nutrition, and health. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 58(6), 984-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2020.1147413

Ahmed, J., & Ramaswamy, H. S. (2023). Viscoelastic and thermal characteristics of starch-based traditional confectionery systems. LWT - Food Science and Technology, 39(6), 735-744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2023.05.013

Brennan, J. G., & Grandison, A. S. (2023). Food processing handbook (2nd ed.). Wiley-VCH.

Clark, J., & Paz, A. (2020). User-centered design of food processing equipment. International Journal of Food Engineering, 14(5), 1-12.

Deak, T., & Johnson, E. (2020). Hygienic materials for food processing: Standards and applications. Journal of Food Protection, 80(5), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-258

Fellows, P. (2023). Food processing technology: Principles and practice (3rd ed.). Woodhead Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845696344

Fernandez, R., & Ocampo, J. (2020). User adaptability to semi-automated kitchen equipment in traditional food sectors. Asian Culinary Research Journal, 4(2), 55-67.

Gonzales, P. R., & Cruz, F. M. (2020). Material durability in locally fabricated food machinery. Philippine Engineering Research Journal, 12(1), 20-30.

Heldman, D. R., & Hartel, R. W. (2020). Principles of food processing (4th ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90755-0

Hussain, S., Singh, B., & Sharma, S. (2020). Rheological characterization of high-viscosity food materials: Implications for processing and quality. Journal of Texture Studies, 51(4), 679-690. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtxs.12543

Limbaga, J. A. (2020). Kalamay-making practices in Bohol: Tradition and technique. Journal of Philippine Gastronomy, 5(1), 22-31.

McCabe, W. L., Smith, J. C., & Harriott, P. (2023). Unit operations of chemical engineering (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Nakka, R., Kumar, P., & Rao, V. (2020). Mechanized mixing solutions for traditional confectionery products. Journal of Food Processing Engineering, 39(5), 432-440. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.12265

Noda, S., & Hirose, K. (2020). Enhancing safety through automation in thermal food operations. Journal of Food Safety Engineering, 6(1), 22-30.

Padmanabhan, M., & Bhattacharya, S. (1990). Rheology of rice-based pastes and extrudates. Journal of Food Engineering, 14(2), 101-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0260-8774(91)90086-O

Ramaswamy, H. S., & Marcotte, M. (2023). Food processing: Principles and applications (3rd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell.

Rao, M. A. (2022). Rheology of fluid and semisolid foods: Principles and applications (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9230-6

Santos, A. G., & Magtoto, M. J. (2020). Designing ergonomic tools for local food artisans: A Philippine case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 8(3), 34-45.

Singh, R. P., & Heldman, D. R. (2022). Introduction to food engineering (5th ed.). Academic Press.

Steffe, J. F. (2020). Rheological methods in food process engineering (3rd ed.). Freeman Press.

Toledo, R. T. (2023). Fundamentals of food process engineering (3rd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90098-8

Veluri, R. (2022). Viscosity and textural behavior of food dispersions: A comprehensive review. Food Hydrocolloids, 124, 107284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.107284

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Bayog, N. G., & Gonzaga, J. (2026). Automated Kalamay Hati Mixer. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(7), 1982-1993. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21615979

Similar Articles

11-20 of 661

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.