A Web-Based Customer Satisfaction Survey System for Local Government Unit: Design, Implementation, and ISO/IEC 25010 Quality Evaluation

Authors

  • Rod Harvie S. Osio Madridejos Community College, Bunakan, Madridejos, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Dino L. Ilustrisimo Madridejos Community College, Bunakan, Madridejos, Cebu, Philippines Author
  • Richard H. Daruca Madridejos Community College, Bunakan, Madridejos, Cebu, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18896896

Keywords:

Customer satisfaction, E-governance, Survey system, Usability evaluation, ISO 25010, Web application, Local government unit, Municipality of Madridejos

Abstract

Measuring customer satisfaction is important for assessing local government units (LGUs) public service performances, including rural health services, environmental and natural resource management, and municipal engineering and infrastructure operations. Old paper-based feedback techniques can be ineffective and limit immediate examination. Using the Basic Chevron Process model, this project creates a web-based Customer Satisfaction Survey System (CSSS) for the Municipality of Madridejos. Survey management, data visualization dashboards, and mobile accessibility are features included in the Customer Satisfaction Survey System. Three intentionally chosen information technology (IT) professionals assessed the system. The USE questionnaire (Usefulness, Satisfaction, and Ease of Use/Learning), the ISO/IEC 25010 Software Quality Model for software properties, and a system functionality survey in line with the study's goals were among the evaluation tools. Mean (M) ratings were calculated using descriptive statistics. Both informed consent and ethical approval were acquired. According to expert review, the CSSS is very functional; all functioning indicators received an average value of 5.0 (Excellent). High performance was demonstrated by ISO/IEC 25010 quality qualities M=4.20 (Very Satisfactory), with Reliability receiving the highest score M=4.50 (Very Satisfactory), Strong usability M=4.30 (Very Satisfactory), and the best score in Ease of Learning M=4.60 (Very Satisfactory) were reported by the USE questionnaire. The technology was found by the experts to be effective at showing survey data, responsive, and available online. Strong usability and functional performance were displayed by the CSSS, suggesting that it is appropriate for processing LGU customer feedback. The results point to increasing covered departments, improving security features, and adding advanced analytics for wider governmental deployment as the main areas of future development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alshamrani, A., & Bahattab, A. (2019). A comparison between three SDLC models: Waterfall, spiral, and incremental model. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, 12(1), 106–111.

Banawa, J. A., & De Jesus, M. J. T. D. (2025). Client satisfaction analysis for delivery of services with natural language processing and decision support system. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(5), 3733–3745. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2025.905000283

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

De Menezes, V. G., Pedrosa, G. V., da Silva, M. P. P., & da C. Figueiredo, R. M. (2022). Evaluation of public services considering the expectations of users—A systematic literature review. Information, 13(4), 162. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13040162

Development Academy of the Philippines, Productivity and Development Center. (n.d.). Improving frontline government services through citizens’ feedback. https://pdc.dap.edu.ph/index.php/improving-frontline-government-services-through-citizens-feedback/

Ghazali, M. B., & Abd Wahab, H. (2017). Concept of customer satisfaction. Journal of Administrative Science, 14(1). http://jas.uitm.edu.my/images/2017_JUNE/4.pdf

Nielsen, J. (2012). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. Nielsen Norman Group. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-101-introduction-to-usability/

Shankar, A., Fischer, J. M., & Peters, K. (2024). Trust, risk, privacy and security in e-government use: Insights from a MASEM analysis. Information Systems Frontiers, 27, 1089–1105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-024-10497-8

Špaček, M., & Špačková, M. (2025). From expectation and participation to satisfaction: The moderating role of perceived government responsiveness in digital government. Administrative Sciences, 15(9), 364. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15090364

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

Ye, X., Su, X., Yao, Z., Dong, L.-A., Lin, Q., & Yu, S. (2023). How do citizens view digital government services? Study on digital government service quality based on citizen feedback. Mathematics, 11(14), 3122. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11143122

Downloads

Published

2026-03-07

How to Cite

Osio, R. H., Ilustrisimo, D., & Daruca, R. (2026). A Web-Based Customer Satisfaction Survey System for Local Government Unit: Design, Implementation, and ISO/IEC 25010 Quality Evaluation. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(3), 356-363. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18896896

Similar Articles

1-10 of 78

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.