Differentiated Scenario-Based Learning and Students' Critical Thinking in Earth Science at Wray School District RD-2, Colorado, USA

Authors

  • Ruel Gonzaga Sanot Graduate Program, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Maguindanao Author
  • Always Germo Graduate Program, College of Education, Mindanao State University-Maguindanao Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22195848

Keywords:

differentiated scenario-based learning, critical thinking, Earth Science, quasi-experimental design, tiered tasks, contextual learning

Abstract

This study examined the effect of differentiated scenario-based learning on students' critical thinking in Earth Science at Wray School District RD-2, Colorado, USA. A quasi-experimental, nonequivalent-groups pretest-posttest design was employed using two intact freshman Earth Science classes. The final analytic sample included 26 students who completed both assessments: 10 in the differentiated scenario-based learning group and 16 in the lecture-based instruction group. A researcher-developed, expert-reviewed critical thinking assessment was administered before and after a two-week intervention. Frequencies, percentages, means, standard deviations, paired-samples t tests, and independent-samples t tests were used in the analysis. Both groups demonstrated low critical thinking before instruction, and their pretest means did not differ significantly, t(24) = 1.38, p = .181. After instruction, the differentiated scenario-based learning group reached a high mean level (M = 34.10, SD = 7.84), while the lecture-based group reached a moderate level (M = 21.40, SD = 10.26). The differentiated scenario-based learning group improved significantly from pretest to posttest, t(9) = 5.49, p < .001, whereas the lecture-based group did not, t(15) = 2.06, p = .058. The posttest difference favored differentiated scenario-based learning, t(24) = 3.33, p = .003. Within the limitations of the small, intact-group design, authentic scenarios, tiered tasks, guided supports, collaboration, and reflection were associated with stronger critical thinking performance in Earth Science.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, H. H. (2019). Adopting scenario-based learning in critical care nursing education: Students' achievement and feedback. American Journal of Nursing Research, 7(4), 581-588. https://doi.org/10.12691/ajnr-7-4-20

Almazova, N., Rubtsova, A., Kats, N., Eremin, Y., & Smolskaia, N. (2021). Scenario-based instruction: The case of foreign language training at multidisciplinary university. Education Sciences, 11(5), Article 227. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11050227

Barua, K., & Chakrabarti, P. (2017). A survey on critical thinking in education scenario. International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science & Communication Engineering, 3(12), 197-203.

Blinkoff, E., Nesbitt, K. T., Golinkoff, R. M., & Hirsh-Pasek, K. (2023). Investigating the contributions of active, playful learning to student interest and educational outcomes. Acta Psychologica, 238, Article 103983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.103983

Daulika, A., Junus, K., Santoso, H. B., Michael, J., & Mannix, I. A. (2025). The influence of critical thinking implementation in education: A systematic literature review. Eduvest: Journal of Universal Studies, 5(9), 11648-11664. https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v5i9.51391

Guler, T. (2025). The impact of scenario-based learning on the scientific creativity and reflective thinking skills of fourth-grade students in primary school. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 24(2), 271-283. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/25.24.271

Hassan, A. K., Hammadi, S. S., & Majeed, B. H. (2023). The impact of a scenario-based learning model in mathematics achievement and mental motivation for high school students. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(7), 103-115. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v18i07.39263

Hidayati, Y., & Sinaga, P. (2019). The profile of critical thinking skills students on science learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(4), Article 044075. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/4/044075

Joaquin, L. L., & Hermosa, J. P. (2023). Scenario-based learning approach for enhancing the critical thinking skills of Grade 9 students in Araling Panlipunan. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business & Education Research, 4(5), 1708-1715. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.05.31

Johnston, O., Wildy, H., & Shand, J. (2023). Teenagers learn through play too: Communicating high expectations through a playful learning approach. The Australian Educational Researcher, 50(3), 921-940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-022-00534-3

McFarlane, D. A. (2011). Multiple intelligences: The most effective platform for global 21st-century educational and instructional methodologies. College Quarterly, 14(2).

Mehall, S. (2022). Comparing in-class scenario-based learning to scenario-based eLearning through an interactive, self-paced case study. Journal of Education for Business, 97(5), 305-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2021.1943294

Mio, C., Ventura-Medina, E., & Joao, E. (2019). Scenario-based eLearning to promote active learning in large cohorts: Students' perspective. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 27(4), 894-909. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22123

Morgan, A. (2024). Enhancing access in an online course using Universal Design for Learning (UDL) and Scenario-Based Learning (SBL). TechTrends, 68(5), 904-913. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00981-y

Narueprempree, N., Tachom, K., & Rakpa, S. (2023). Dilemmas in the classroom: A study on the efficacy of scenario-based learning in critical thinking enhancement. วารสารจิตวิทยาพุทธศาสตร์ประยุกต์เพื่อสังคม, 9(2), 263-283. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/human/article/view/273393

Short, R. A., Van der Eb, M. Y., & McKay, S. R. (2020). Effect of productive discussion on written argumentation in Earth Science classrooms. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1712314

Toledo, F. L. (2023). Differentiated instruction for enhanced students' academic performance in Science 10 (Physics). International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business & Education Research, 4(8), 2831-2846. https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.04.08.21

Utami, B., Saputro, S., Ashadi, A., Masykuri, M., & Widoretno, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills profile of high school students in learning chemistry. International Journal of Science and Applied Science: Conference Series, 1(2), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v1i2.5134

Winarti, A., Yuanita, L., & Nur, M. (2019). The effectiveness of a multiple intelligences-based teaching strategy in enhancing multiple intelligences and science process skills of junior high school students. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 9(2), 122-135. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.404

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Sanot, R. G., & Germo, A. . (2026). Differentiated Scenario-Based Learning and Students’ Critical Thinking in Earth Science at Wray School District RD-2, Colorado, USA. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(8), 2108-2116. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22195848

Similar Articles

1-10 of 963

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.