Leading Elementary Schools After Learning Loss through Recovery Stewardship and Coherent Teacher Support
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22803456Keywords:
coherent teacher support, elementary education, instructional guidance, learning recovery, recovery stewardship, school leadershipAbstract
This study explored how recovery stewardship and coherent teacher support had operated together in public elementary schools addressing learning loss in Echague East District. A cross-sectional explanatory survey design was used with 70 public elementary school teachers selected through simple random sampling. Data were gathered using the 40-item Recovery Stewardship and Coherent Teacher Support Scale, which obtained an Aiken’s V coefficient of 0.94 and an overall Cronbach’s alpha of 0.95. Means and standard deviations described the extent of the two constructs, while canonical correlation analysis determined their multivariate relationship. Recovery stewardship was often observed overall, with a mean of 3.99, while coherent teacher support also registered an often-observed level, with a mean of 3.90. Resource and workload support emerged as the weakest area, particularly the reduction of non-instructional demands during intensive learning recovery. The first canonical function was significant, Rc = 0.787, Rc² = 0.619, Wilks’ Lambda = 0.352, χ²(16) = 67.365, p < .001, indicating substantial shared variance between the two variable sets. Shared responsibility for learning recovery and instructional guidance contributed most strongly to the significant relationship. The findings showed that recovery leadership had been more coherent when teachers were actively involved in recovery efforts and received clear instructional direction. The study underscored the importance of aligning leadership priorities, teacher support, workload conditions, and instructional guidance in sustaining school-level learning recovery.
Downloads
References
Betthäuser, B. A., Bach-Mortensen, A. M., & Engzell, P. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence on learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 375–385. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-022-01506-4
Brown, B., Wang, T., Lee, M., & Childs, A. (2023). Surviving, navigating and innovating through a pandemic: A review of research on school leadership during COVID-19, 2020–2021. International Journal of Educational Development, 100, 102804.
Carroll, K., Patrick, S. K., & Goldring, E. (2021). School factors that promote teacher collaboration: Results from the Tennessee Instructional Partnership Initiative. American Journal of Education, 127(4), 501–530.
Gibbons, L. K., Wilhelm, A. G., & Cobb, P. (2019). Coordinating leadership supports for teachers’ instructional improvement. Journal of School Leadership, 29(3), 248–268.
Global Education Monitoring Report Team. (2024). Leadership in education: Lead for learning. 2024/5 Global Education Monitoring Report. UNESCO.
Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Hopkins, D. (2020). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership revisited. School Leadership & Management, 40(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2019.1596077
McLeod, S., & Dulsky, S. (2021). Resilience, reorientation, and reinvention: School leadership during the early months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Education, 6, 637075.
Nwosu, L. I., Matashu, M., & Buabeng, A. T. (2022). A call to strengthen instructional leadership to support learner achievement during and post COVID-19: A systematic literature review approach. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(7), 219–240.
Salloum, S. J. (2022). Building coherence: An investigation of collective efficacy, social context, and how leaders shape teachers’ work. American Journal of Education, 128(2), 203–243.
Stang-Rabrig, J., Brüggemann, T., Lorenz, R., & McElvany, N. (2022). Teachers’ occupational well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic: The role of resources and demands. Teaching and Teacher Education, 117, 103803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103803
Stosich, E. L. (2020). Central office leadership for instructional improvement: Developing collaborative leadership among principals and instructional leadership team members. Teachers College Record, 122(9), 1–42.
van Schaik, P., Volman, M., Admiraal, W., & Schenke, W. (2020). Fostering collaborative teacher learning: A typology of school leadership. European Journal of Education, 55(2), 217–232.
World Bank. (2026). World Bank backs better learning for 21 million Filipino students. World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.