The Mediating Effect of Learning Environment on the Relationship Between Pedagogical Competence of Teachers and Engagement of Criminology Students in North Cotabato Province
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22922083Keywords:
criminology, pedagogical competence, student engagement, learning environment, mediation, PhilippinesAbstract
This study ascertained the role that the learning environment had in mediating the link between pedagogical competence and student engagement. Adapted survey questionnaires were given to 300 criminology students selected through stratified sampling. Data was collected through online platform and statistical tools used were mean and standard deviation, Pearson r and Path analysis. The results demonstrated that teachers' levels of pedagogical competence are quite high, along with very high levels of student engagement and learning environments. There is a significant relationship between pedagogical competence and student engagement, pedagogical competence and learning environment, as well as learning environment and student engagement. The present study found support for learning environment as a mediator in the pedagogical competence–student engagement relationship. Investigating the learning environment as a partially mediating variable helped to clarify how pedagogical competency and student engagement function.
Downloads
References
Abadi, M. K., Pujiastuti, H., & Assaat, L. D. (2017, February). Development of teaching materials based interactive scientific approach towards the concept of social arithmetic for junior high school student. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 812, No. 1, p. 012015). IOP Publishing.
Akram, M., Malik M., Sarwar, M. Anwer, M. & Ahmand, F. (2015). Relationship of teachers Competence with professional Commitment and Job satisfaction.
Amusan, M. (2016). Cultivating Effective Pedagogical Skills in In-Service Teachers: The Role of Some teachers Variables.Retrieved : March 12, 2019 from: https//files.eric.ed.gov.
AYER Journals USL. Volume 4, Page 58-70 ISSN:1134-2277
Banerjee, N., Stearns, E., Moller, S., & Mickelson, R. A. (2017). Teacher job Satisfaction
and student achievement: The roles of teacher professional community and teacher
collaboration in schools. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 000-000.
Bullock, N. (2017).Factors Affecting Student Motivation and Achievement in Science in Selected Middle School Eighth Grade Classes. Electronic Theses & Dissertations Collection for Atlanta University & Clark Atlanta University. 63. https://digitalcommons.auctr.edu/cauetds/63
Carroll, M., Lindsey, S., Chaparro, M., & Winslow, B. (2021). An applied model of learner
engagement and strategies for increasing learner engagement in the modern
educational environment. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(5), 757-771.
Chepkonga, M. (2017). Classroom environmental setting and provision of quality
education in public pre-school centres in West Pokot County, Kenya. European
Journal of Education Studies.
Christenson, S. L., Reschly, A. L., & Wylie, C. (2012). Handbook of research on student engagement NeyYork Springer
Cooper Stein, K., Kintz, T., & Miness, A. (2016). Reflectiveness, adaptivity, and support: How teacher agency promotes student engagement. American Journal of Education, 123(1), 109-136.
DeVito, M. (2016). Factors Inflencing Student Engagement. Unpublished Certificate of Advanced Study Thesis, Sacred Heart University, Fairfild, CT. Retrieved from htt://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/edl/11
Deschaine, M. E., & Sharma, S. A. (2015). The Five Cs of Digital Curation: Supporting Twenty-First-Century Teaching and Learning. InSight: A journal of scholarly teaching, 10, 19-24.
Dislen, G. (2013). The reasons of lack of Motivation from the Students and teachers Voices. ASOS Journal, The Journal of Academic Sciences.
Finkelstein, S., Sharma, U., & Furlonger, B. (2021). The inclusive practices of classroom teachers: a scoping review and thematic analysis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 25(6), 735-762.
Fredricks, J. A., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. A. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues.
Greene, B. A. (2015). Measuring cognitive engagement with self-report scales: Reflections
from over 20 years of research. Educational Psychologist, 50(1), 14-30.
Grubaugh, S. & Houston, R. (2013). Establishing a Classroom Environment That Promotes Interaction and Improved Student Behavior.” The Clearing House, Vol. 63, No. 8 pp. 375-379.
Henry, K. L., Knight, K. E., & Thornberry, T. P. (2012). School disengagement as a predictor of dropout, delinquency, and problem substance use during adolescence and early adulthood. Journal of youth and adolescence, 41(2), 156-166.
HDEAPR. (2010). Transforming Indonesia's Teaching Force. Jakarta: (Human development East Asia and Pasific Region) The World Bank.
Ismail, S. N., Shanmugam, S. K. S., & Rajoo, M. (2021). FACTORS AFFECTING TEACHERS'FUNCTIONAL COMPETENCY LEVEL IN HIGH-PERFORMANCE SCHOOLS. MOJEM: Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Management, 9(2), 63-77
Jæger, M. M., & Møllegaard, S. (2022). Where Do Cultural Tastes Come From? Genes, Environments, or Experiences. Sociological Science, 9, 252-274.
Jan, H. (2017). Teacher of 21st century: Characteristics and development. Research on Humanities and Social sciences, 7(9), 50-54.
Klaver, L. T., Walma van der Molen, J. H., Sins, P. H., & Guérin, L. J. (2022). Students' engagement with Socioscientific issues: Use of sources of knowledge and attitudes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.
Koch, J. M., Procopio, S. J., Knutson, D., Loche III, R. W., Jayne, A., Jayne, C., & Loche, L. (2018). Counseling psychology students’ perceptions of faculty multicultural competence. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 4(3), 140.
Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Baumert, J., Ritcher, D., Voss, T. & Hachfeld, A. (2015). Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development. Journal of education Psychology Volume 105. No.3
Lee, J.S. (2014). The relationship between student engagement and academic performance: Is it a myth or reality? The Journal of Educational Research, 107(3), 177–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2013.807491
Matusovich, H., Carrico, C., Harris, A., Sheppard, S., Brunhaver, S., Streveler, R., & Lester, M. B. M. (2019). Internships and engineering: beliefs and behaviorsof academics. Education+ Training.
Mróz, A., & Ocetkiewicz, I. (2021). Creativity for sustainability: how do polish teachersdevelop students’ creativity competence? Analysis of research results.Sustainability, 13(2), 571.
Murugan, A. &Rajoo, L. (2013): Students‟ Perceptions of Mathematics Classroom Environment & Mathematics Achievement: A Study in Sipitang, Sabah, Malaysia: Proceeding of TheInternational Conference on Social Science Research, Icssr 2013 (E-Isbn 978-967- 11768-1- 8). 4-5 June 2013, Penang, Malaysia.Organized By Worldconferences.Net
Narciso R. (2017). Work Stress and Performances of UM Tagum College Faculty, International Journal of Advancement in research and technology, Volume 6, Issue 2.
Narmadha, U., & Chamundeswari, S. (2013). Attitude towards learning of science and academic achievement in science among students at the secondary level. Journal of Sociological Research, 4(2), 114.
Panisoara, G. (2015). The Infleunce of Reasons Approving Student Motivation for Learning.Procedia-Social and behavioral Sciences Volume 197 page 1215.
Pare Pos. (2012). Nilai UKG Sulsel di BawahRerata National. Pare Pos
Perera, L. D. H. (2014). Parents' attitudes towards science and their children's science achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 36(18), 3021-3041.
Punongbayan, E. & Bauyon, S. (2015), Instructional Performance of Teacher, Asia Pacific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, Vol. 3, No. 5, December 2015 Part
I Education Faculty Members in One State University in the Philippines.
Rasulova, Z. D. (2020). Pedagogical peculiarities of developing socio perceptive
competence in learners. European Journal of Research and Reflection in
Educational Sciences, 8.
Read, L. & Atinc, T. (2017). Investigations into Using Data to Improve Learning: Philippine Case Study. Global Economy and Development at Brookings
Real, J. A. B. (2022). 21st century competencies of teachers in teacher education institutions: Basis for designing faculty development program. International Research Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(2), 153-164.
Reparaz, C., & Sotés-Elizalde, M. A. (2019). Parental involvement in schools in Spain
and Germany: Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of Educational
Research, 93, 33-52.
Rooney, M. (2017). Educational Learning Environments.
Ryu, S., & Lombardi, D. (2015). Coding classroom interactions for collective and individual engagement. Educational Psychologist, 50, 70 e83.
Real, J. A. B. (2022). 21st century competencies of teachers in teacher education
institutions: Basis for designing faculty development program. International Research
Journal of Science, Technology, Education, and Management, 2(2), 153-164.
SEDORY, A. C. (2020). Sample Size Calculations for Longitudinal Mediation Analysiswith Continuous-time Markov Chain Variables.
Selvi, K. (2012). Teachers‟ Competencies, Faculty of Education, Anadolu University, 26470 Eskisehir, Turkey Retrieved From” kselvi@anadolu.edu.tr
Sharma D. (2011). Training the Teacher Trainer.Deep& Deep Publications PVT. Ltd. New Delhi
Sheppard, S. L. (2011). School engagement: A „danse macabre‟?. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 45(1), 111-123.
Shernoff, D. J. (2013). Measuring student engagement in high school classrooms and what we have learned. In Optimal learning environments to promote student engagement (pp. 77-96). Springer, New York, NY.
Shoshani, A., Steinmetz, S., & Kanat-Maymon, Y. (2016). Effects of the Maytiv positive psychology school program on early adolescents' well-being, engagement, and achievement. Journal of school psychology, 57, 73-92.
Simmons, R. (2015). The Impact of Differentiated Instruction on Student Reading Level Throughout the Response to Intervention Model St. John Fisher College, rms01326@students.sjfc.edu
Suana, I. W., Ahyadi, H., Hadiprayitno, G., Amin, S., Sukmaring, L. A. T. T. W., & Sudaryanto, F. X. (2020). Environment carrying capacity and willingness to pay for bird-watching ecotourism in Kerandangan Natural Park, Lombok, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 21(5).
Supkhonovna, H. N. (2021). Technology for the development of the qualities of pedagogical competence in future teachers. Asian Journal of Multidimensional Research, 10(5), 372-382.
Syahruddin, AndiErnawati, & Muh. Nasir Ede. (2013). Teachers‟ Pedagogical Competence in School-Based Management.Journal of Education and Learning.Vol.7 (4) pp. 213-218.
Tamura, A., Murayama, K., Ishii, R., Sakaki, M., & Tanaka, A. (2022). The effect of low-intensity exercise on emotional and cognitive engagement in the classroom. npj Science of Learning, 7(1), 1-7.
Tanner, K. D. (2013). Structure matters: twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(3), 322-331.
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134-150.
Vanlaar, G., Kyriakides, L., Panayiotou, A., Vandecandelaere, M., McMahon, L., De Fraine, B., & Van Damme, J. (2016). Do the teacher and school factors of the dynamic model affect high-and low-achieving student groups to the same extent? A cross-country study. Research Papers in Education, 31(2), 183-211.
Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017). In peer matters, teachers matter: Peer group influences on students‟ engagement depend on teacher involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(5), 635.
Walliman, N. (2011). Research Method the Basics.Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London and Newyork. Retrieved: October 12, 2018 from: https//edisciplinas.usp.br
Wang, M. T., Degol, J. L., & Henry, D. A. (2019). An integrative development-in-sociocultural-context model for children’s engagement in learning. American Psychologist, 74(9), 1086.
Wentzel, K. R. (2010). Students‟ relationships with teachers.In J. L. Meece& J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of Research onSchools, Schooling, and Human Development (pp. 75-91). New York, NY: Routledge.
Wiggan, G., & Watson-Vandiver, M. J. (2019). Pedagogy of empowerment: Student perspectives on critical multicultural education at a high-performing African American school. Race ethnicity and education, 22(6), 767-787.
Woolner, P., & Stadler-Altmann, U. (2021). Openness–flexibility–transition. Nordic prospects for changes in the school learning environment. Education Inquiry, 12(3), 301-310.
Yazzie-Mintz, E., & McCormick, K. (2012). Finding the humanity in the data: Understanding, measuring, and strengthening student engagement.
In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 743-761). Springer, Boston, MA.
Yazçayir, N., & Selvi, K. (2014). Information and communication technology competencies of class teachers. International Journal of Innovative Research in Education, 20-30.
Yesilyurt, E., et al (2014). 1The Effect of Technological Devices on Student‟s Academic Success: EvidencefromDenizli, meyyur t@pau.edu.tr
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
