Instructional Response Patterns after Repeated Learning Failure

Authors

  • Carissa Nova R. Cristobal Northeastern College Author
  • Alma P. Gonzales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22934245

Keywords:

adaptive instruction, diagnostic reconsideration, elementary education, instructional response, intervention intensification, learning failure

Abstract

This study traced how elementary teachers adjusted their instructional responses when learners continued to experience difficulty across successive learning attempts. Using a vignette-based repeated-measures instructional decision design, data were gathered from 55 public elementary school teachers in Baggao, Cagayan who had direct experience supporting learners with persistent learning difficulties. Responses were collected through a validated 32-item Instructional Response Pattern Inventory covering diagnostic reconsideration, adaptive instructional modification, intervention intensification, and motivational or relational support. Descriptive statistics and ordinal generalized estimating equations were used to determine changes in response intensity across three repeated failure episodes. Results showed that teachers became progressively more responsive as failure persisted. By the third failure episode, the odds of stronger diagnostic reconsideration increased by 2.54 times, adaptive instructional modification by 2.18 times, and intervention intensification by 3.69 times compared with the first failure episode. Intervention intensification showed the strongest shift, indicating that continued nonresponse prompted teachers to escalate academic support. In contrast, motivational and relational support declined significantly by the third failure episode, with 38% lower odds of stronger support compared with the first episode. The findings indicate that teachers were capable of adjusting and intensifying instruction in response to persistent difficulty, but relational support weakened as academic failure continued. Strengthening intervention systems should therefore combine data-informed instructional escalation with sustained encouragement, learner confidence-building, and responsive support.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Department of Education. (2023). Adoption of the National Learning Recovery Program in the Department of Education (DepEd Order No. 013, s. 2023).

Deunk, M. I., Smale-Jacobse, A. E., de Boer, H., Doolaard, S., & Bosker, R. J. (2018). Effective differentiation practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies on the cognitive effects of differentiation practices in primary education. Educational Research Review, 24, 31–54.

Espinas, D. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2022). Data-based individualization in reading. The Reading League Journal, 3(1), 4–13.

Fien, H., Chard, D. J., & Baker, S. K. (2021). Can the evidence revolution and multi-tiered systems of support improve education equity and reading achievement? Reading Research Quarterly, 56(S1), S105–S118.

Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (2021). Bringing data-based individualization to scale: A call for the next-generation technology of teacher supports. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 54(5), 319–333.

Gentrup, S., Lorenz, G., Kristen, C., & Kogan, I. (2020). Self-fulfilling prophecies in the classroom: Teacher expectations, teacher feedback and student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 66, 101296.

Hall, C., Dahl-Leonard, K., Cho, E., Solari, E. J., Capin, P., Conner, C. L., Henry, A. R., Cook, L., Hayes, L., Vargas, I., Richmond, C. L., & Kehoe, K. F. (2023). Forty years of reading intervention research for elementary students with or at risk for dyslexia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 58(2), 285–312.

Powell, S. R., Doabler, C. T., Akinola, O. A., Therrien, W. J., Maddox, S. A., & Hess, K. E. (2020). A synthesis of elementary mathematics interventions: Comparisons of students with mathematics difficulty with and without comorbid reading difficulty. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 53(4), 244–276.

Schumacher, R. F., Zumeta Edmonds, R., & Arden, S. V. (2017). Examining implementation of intensive intervention in mathematics. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 32(3), 189–199.

Timmermans, A. C., Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Wang, S. (2021). Adjusting expectations or maintaining first impressions? The stability of teachers' expectations of students' mathematics achievement. Learning and Instruction, 75, 101483.

Varier, D., & Yun, S. (2023). A review of research on assessment use: Implications for preparing early childhood educators for data-informed decision-making. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 44(4), 1067–1092.

World Bank & UNESCO. (2022). Philippines: Learning poverty brief 2022. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-24

How to Cite

Cristobal, C. N., & Gonzales, A. (2026). Instructional Response Patterns after Repeated Learning Failure. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 1888-1894. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22934245

Similar Articles

111-120 of 788

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>