Letters to Meaning Pathways for Confident Grade 1 Reading

Authors

  • Jaya L. Rodriguez Northeastern College Author
  • Alma P. Gonzales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22952663

Keywords:

alphabetic knowledge, decoding, Grade 1 reading, meaning construction, reading confidence, reading instruction

Abstract

This study traced how foundational literacy skills progressed toward meaningful and confident reading among Grade 1 learners in Baggao, Cagayan. A multilevel explanatory pathway design was employed involving 24 Grade 1 teachers and 96 Grade 1 learners. Data were gathered through a teacher instructional pathway scale and a learner reading battery measuring letter-sound knowledge, word decoding, meaning construction, and reading confidence. Bayesian multilevel serial mediation analysis was used to estimate direct, indirect, and classroom-level effects. Results showed that learners performed better in letter-sound knowledge than in word decoding and meaning construction, indicating increasing difficulty as reading demands shifted from symbol recognition to comprehension. Letter-sound knowledge strongly predicted decoding, while decoding contributed substantially to meaning construction. Meaning construction, in turn, positively influenced reading confidence. The direct pathway from letter-sound knowledge to confidence was not supported, suggesting that familiarity with letters alone did not sufficiently strengthen learners’ confidence unless it resulted in successful word reading and understanding. Teacher instructional practices also contributed positively to decoding, meaning construction, and confidence. The serial mediation model confirmed that the progression from letter-sound knowledge through decoding and meaning-making provided a credible pathway toward confident reading. The findings underscore the need for Grade 1 instruction that deliberately connects alphabetic knowledge, decoding, comprehension, and confidence-building experiences. Targeted diagnostic support is recommended for learners who demonstrate foundational knowledge but experience difficulty converting these skills into meaningful reading.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51.

Department of Education. (2023). MATATAG curriculum: Reading and literacy curriculum guide. Department of Education.

Duke, N. K., Ward, A. E., & Pearson, P. D. (2021). The science of reading comprehension instruction. The Reading Teacher, 74(6), 663–672.

Ehri, L. C. (2020). The science of learning to read words: A case for systematic phonics instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S45–S60.

Graham, L. J., White, S. L. J., Tancredi, H. A., Snow, P. C., & Cologon, K. (2020). A longitudinal analysis of the alignment between children's early word-level reading trajectories, teachers' reported concerns and supports provided. Reading and Writing, 33(8), 1895–1923.

Hjetland, H. N., Brinchmann, E. I., Scherer, R., Hulme, C., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2020). Preschool pathways to reading comprehension: A systematic meta-analytic review. Educational Research Review, 30, 100323.

Jensen, M. T., Solheim, O. J., & Idsøe, E. M. C. (2019). Do you read me? Associations between perceived teacher emotional support, reader self-concept, and reading achievement. Social Psychology of Education, 22, 247–266.

Karageorgos, P., Richter, T., Haffmans, M. B., Schindler, J., & Naumann, J. (2020). The role of word-recognition accuracy in the development of word-recognition speed and reading comprehension in primary school: A longitudinal examination. Cognitive Development, 56, 100949.

Locher, F. M., Becker, S., Schiefer, I., & Pfost, M. (2021). Mechanisms mediating the relation between reading self-concept and reading comprehension. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 1–20.

Petscher, Y., Cabell, S. Q., Catts, H. W., Compton, D. L., Foorman, B. R., Hart, S. A., Lonigan, C. J., Phillips, B. M., Schatschneider, C., Steacy, L. M., Terry, N. P., & Wagner, R. K. (2020). How the science of reading informs 21st-century education. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S267–S282.

Philippine Statistics Authority. (2026). Philippine Standard Geographic Code: Province of Cagayan. Philippine Statistics Authority.

Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420–456.

Wawire, B. A., Piper, B., & Liang, X. (2021). Examining the simple view of reading in Kiswahili: Longitudinal evidence from Kenya. Learning and Individual Differences, 90, 102044.

World Bank. (2026). World Bank backs better learning for 21 million Filipino students. World Bank.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Rodriguez, J., & Gonzales, A. (2026). Letters to Meaning Pathways for Confident Grade 1 Reading. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 2060-2067. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22952663

Similar Articles

31-40 of 560

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)