Practical Inquiry Tasks for Problem Solving Transfer in Mathematics Classrooms

Authors

  • Marigrace P. Salazar Northeastern College Author
  • Alma P. Gonzales Northeastern College Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22953056

Keywords:

Mathematical justification, practical application, practical inquiry tasks, problem-solving transfer, strategy flexibility, transfer assessment

Abstract

This study investigated how practical inquiry tasks were associated with problem-solving transfer among Grade 10 learners in secondary Mathematics classrooms in San Pablo, Isabela. Using a quantitative predictive correlational design with an embedded performance-based transfer assessment, data were collected from 180 learners selected through proportionate stratified random sampling. Practical inquiry experiences were assessed across exploration, strategy flexibility, mathematical justification, and practical application, while transfer performance was measured through near-transfer and far-transfer mathematical tasks. Rasch measurement was used to evaluate task difficulty and learner ability, while quantile regression and relative importance analysis determined the contribution of inquiry dimensions across varying levels of transfer performance. Results showed that learners experienced a moderate level of practical inquiry and performed better in near-transfer than in far-transfer tasks, revealing difficulty in applying mathematical knowledge to unfamiliar problem structures. Practical application emerged as the strongest predictor of transfer performance, followed by strategy flexibility and mathematical justification. Exploration showed a weaker contribution, particularly among higher-performing learners. The inquiry dimensions collectively explained a substantial proportion of the variance in transfer performance. The findings indicate that inquiry becomes more effective when learners are required to adapt strategies, justify mathematical decisions, and apply concepts across varied situations. Mathematics instruction should therefore incorporate transfer-oriented tasks that move beyond routine procedures and provide sustained opportunities for flexible reasoning and practical application.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hänze, M., & Leiss, D. (2022). Using heuristic worked examples to promote solving of reality-based tasks in mathematics in lower secondary school. Instructional Science, 50(4), 529–549.

Hohensee, C., & Lobato, J. (Eds.). (2021). Transfer of learning: Progressive perspectives for mathematics education and related fields. Springer.

Holenstein, M., Bruckmaier, G., & Grob, A. (2021). Transfer effects of mathematical literacy: An integrative longitudinal study. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36, 799–825.

Huang, L., Doorman, M., & van Joolingen, W. (2021). Inquiry-based learning practices in lower-secondary mathematics education reported by students from China and the Netherlands. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 19, 1505–1521.

Jacobson, M. J., Goldwater, M. B., Markauskaite, L., Lai, P. K., Kapur, M., Roberts, G., & Hilton, C. (2020). Schema abstraction with productive failure and analogical comparison: Learning designs for far across domain transfer. Learning and Instruction, 65, 101222.

Li, X., Song, N., Hwang, S., & Cai, J. (2020). Learning to teach mathematics through problem posing: Teachers’ beliefs and performance on problem posing. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 105(3), 325–347.

OECD. (2023a). PISA 2022 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023b). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes: Philippines. OECD Publishing.

Ramadhani, R., Juandi, D., & Nurlaelah, E. (2021). A meta-analysis on the effect of inquiry learning model on students’ mathematical problem-solving skills. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(3).

Schukajlow, S., Krawitz, J., Kanefke, J., Blum, W., & Rakoczy, K. (2023). Open modelling problems: Cognitive barriers and instructional prompts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 114, 417–438.

Völlinger, N., Schukajlow, S., Verschaffel, L., & Krawitz, J. (2026). Openness in real-world mathematical problems: A systematic literature review. Educational Studies in Mathematics.

Yurekli, B., Stein, M. K., Correnti, R., & Kisa, Z. (2020). Teaching mathematics for conceptual understanding: Teachers' beliefs and practices and the role of constraints. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 51(2), 234–247.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-25

How to Cite

Salazar, M., & Gonzales, A. (2026). Practical Inquiry Tasks for Problem Solving Transfer in Mathematics Classrooms. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(9), 2068-2075. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22953056

Similar Articles

61-70 of 498

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>