Motivations, Challenges, Coping Mechanism, Benefits, and Insights of Research Engagement of Mathematics Educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23271530Keywords:
Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA), Research Engagement, Motivations, Challenges, Coping Mechanisms, Benefits, Insights, Mathematics EducatorsAbstract
This qualitative study employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) as its research design and centered on eight mathematics educators from the Negros Island Region in the Philippines. These educators were officially enrolled in master's or doctoral programs at Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) during the academic year 2024-2025. The researcher employed purposive-convenience sampling, selecting readily accessible mathematics educators who also met specific criteria: they had conducted at least one research study, had presented a study, and had taught in a public high school for at least two years. The study sought to understand their lived experiences related to research engagement, using in-depth interviews to capture their motivations, challenges, coping mechanisms, perceived benefits, and insights. The mathematics educators' primary motivator stemmed from a genuine desire to improve their learners' lives, focusing on strategies to enhance comprehension, reduce anxiety, and promote equity. However, these educators faced considerable challenges, including time constraints due to heavy workloads and limited resources, particularly in public schools and part-time positions. To overcome these obstacles, they demonstrated resourcefulness and relied on collaboration, sharing ideas and leveraging networks for support. Despite the hardships, research engagement brought significant rewards, most notably witnessing learners' "lightbulb moments" and experiencing professional growth. Ultimately, the study highlighted the dedication and resilience of these educators, emphasizing the urgent need for institutional support to foster a research culture that empowers them to advance mathematics education in the Philippines.
Downloads
References
Akhmarov, A. V., Potapov, P., & Kaimova, F. A. (2023). EFFECTIVE TIME MANAGEMENT: METHODS AND TECHNIQUES. EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE PROBLEMY RESHENIYA, 10/5(139), 151–157. https://doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2023.10.05.015
Anwaruddin, S. M. (2019). Engagement with research, teacher learning and educational leadership: Towards an interpretive-ecological approach. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(2), 175–188. https://doi. org/10.1080/13603124.2017.1394495
Baker, S., Burke, R., Cabiles, B., Fox, A., & Molla, T. (2024). Navigating institutional ethics processes: Insights from higher degree by research students and supervisors doing research in fragile contexts. Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687941241288178
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215. Bergmark, U. (2020). Teachers’ professional learning when building a research-based education: context-specific, collaborative and teacher-driven professional development.
Professional Development in Education, 49(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1827011
Brennan, L., Cusack, T., Delahunt, E., Kuznesof, S., & Donnelly, S. (2019). Academics’ conceptualisations of the research-teaching nexus in a research-intensive Irish university: A dynamic framework for growth & development. Learning and Instruction, 60, 301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.005
Brown, C., and Zhang, D. (2016) Is engaging in evidence-informed practice in education rational? Examining the divergence between teachers’ attitudes towards evidence use and their actual instances of evidence use in schools, British Educational Research Journal, 42, 5, pp. 780-801.
Brown, C., Daly, A. and Liou, Y-H. (2016) Improving Trust, Improving Schools: Findings from a Social Network Analysis of 43 Primary Schools in England, Journal of Professional Capital & Community, 1, 1, pp. 69-91.
Brown, C., MacGregor, S., Flood, J., & Malin, J. (2022). Facilitating Research-Informed Educational Practice for Inclusion. Survey findings from 147 teachers and school leaders in England. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.890832
Buch, K., McCullough, H., & Tamberelli, L. (2017). Understanding and responding to the unique needs and challenges facing adjunct faculty: a longitudinal study. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 16(10), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.16.10.3
Buffington, M. L., & Sutters, J. P. (2017). Access and Barriers: The publications and resources NAEA members use. Visual Arts Research, 43(2), 91–106.https://doi.org/10.5406/visuartsrese.43.2.0091
Chow, K., Chu, S. K. W., Tavares, N., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2015). Teachers as researchers: A discovery of their emerging role and impact through a school-university collaborative research.
Brock Education Journal, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.26522/brocked.v24i2.374
Coldwell, M., Greany, T., Higgins, S., Brown, C., Maxwell, B., Stiell, B., Stoll, L, Willis, B. and Burns, H. (2017). Evidence-informed teaching: an evaluation of progress in England (London, Department for Education). Commission on Higher Education. (2019). State universities and colleges number of faculty by program level: AY 2018–19. https://ched.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019- SUCs- Faculty-by-Highest-Degree-Attained.pdf Crawford, R. (2022). Action Research as evidence-based practice: enhancing explicit teaching and learning through critical reflection and collegial peer observation. ˜ the œAustralian Journal of Teacher Education, 47(12). https://doi.org/10.14221/1835- 517x.6065 Department of Education. (2016). Department Order No. 39: Adoption of the basic education research agenda.
Dikilitaş, K. (2019). Teacher researchers. In Routledge eBooks (pp. 180–185). https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429461347-30 Dikilitaş, K., & Comoglu, I. (2020). Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research. European Journal of Teacher Educat Eunice, Walter, & Freddy. (2024). Critical thinking skills in research process, a literature review. An input to propose a new measurement instrument to gauge critical thinking. International Journal of Religion, 5(11), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.61707/pwy5df19
Finch, D., Falkenberg, L., McLaren, P. G., Rondeau, K. V., & O’Reilly, N. (2018). The rigour–relevance gap in professional programmes. Industry and Higher Education, 32(3), 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422218768205 Fisher, G. (2023). Resourcefulness enactment: the sensemaking process underpinning resourceful actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 48(4), 911–940.https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587231205321
Giles, W. M. (2021). Mentoring: Bringing it all together. Academia Letters. https://doi.org/10.20935/al3881 Glenn, M., Sullivan, B., Roche, M., & McDonagh, C. (2023). Action research for the classroom. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003288183
Herbert, D. L., Graves, N., Clarke, P., & Barnett, A. G. (2015). Using simplified peer review processes to fund research: a prospective study. BMJ Open, 5(7), e008380. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008380
Hodge, A., Rech, J., Matthews, M., Johnson, K. G., & Jakopovic, P. (2019). Mentoring Future Mathematics Teachers: Lessons Learned from Four Mentoring Partnerships. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). https://doi.org/10.7916/jmetc.v10i2.4194
Johannesson, P. (2020). Development of professional learning communities through action research: understanding professional learning in practice. Educational Action Research, 30(3), 411–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2020.1854100
Li, Y., Li, D., Yang, W., & Li, H. (2020). Negotiating the teaching-research nexus: A case of classroom teaching in an MEd program. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55, 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841- 019-00150-3 Mitton-Kükner, J. (2015). Time constraints experienced by female teacher researchers in Canada and Turkey: challenges to developing an autonomous professional learning mindset.
Professional Development in Education, 42(4), 628–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2015.1073607
Nelson, J., Mehta, P., Sharples, J. and Davey, C. (2017). Measuring Teachers’ Research Engagement: findings from a pilot study (EEF, London). Available online: https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Evaluation/Research_Use/ NFER_Research _Use_pilot_report_-_March_2017_for_publication.pdf [accessed 24 July 2018]. OECD. (2023). Systemic Enablers for a Culture of Research Engagement in Education. OECD Publishing. FILE FILE CONTENT Rothinam, N., Samuel, S. J. I., Vengasalem, R., & Naidu, S. (2024). Systematic literature review on factors influencing teacher motivation. Edelweiss Applied Science and Technology, 8(5), 2261–2281. https://doi.org/10.55214/25768484.v8i5.1981
Scheiner, T., Brodie, K., Planas, N., Darragh, L., Halai, A., Potari, D., Santos-Trigo, M., & Walkoe, J. (2024). Addressing equity, diversity and inclusion in academic publishing: key initiatives from JMTE. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-024-09636-4
Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 118-137). Sage Publications. Smith, J. A., & Nizza, I. E. (2022). What is interpetative phenomenological analysis? In J.A. Smith & I. E. Nizza, Essentials of interpretative phenomenological analysis (pp. 3–10). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000259-001
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2008). Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (2nd ed.). Sage. Tarrayo, V. N., Hernandez, P. J. S., & Claustro, J. M. A. S. (2021). Research engagement by English language teachers in a Philippine University: Insights from a qualitative study. *Asia-Pacific Social Science Review, 21*(3), 73-85. Torres, J. and M. Steponavičius (2022), "More than just a go-between: The role of intermediaries in knowledge mobilisation", OECD Education Working Papers, No. 285, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/aa29cfd3-en.
Ulla, M. B. (2018). Benefits and challenges of doing research: Experiences from Philippine public school teachers. Issues in Educational Research, 28(3), 797– 810. http://www.iier.org.au/iier28/ulla.pdf Ulla, M. B., Barrera, K. B., & Acompanado, M. M. (2017). Philippine classroom teachers as researchers: Teachers’ perceptions, motivations, and challenges. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 42(11), 52–64. http:// dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2017v42n11.4
Vecaldo, R., Asuncion, J. E., & Ulla, M. (2019): From writing to presenting and publishing research articles: Experiences of Philippine education faculty-researchers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 81, 147–164.
Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2015). Factors leading to limited faculty publications in Philippine higher education institutions. International Forum, 18(2), 121–141. Xu, W. (2024c). Enhancing educators’ research skills in secondary education in Huaihua, China. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 8(2), 337–341. https://doi.org/10.54097/e5aves77
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
