An Assessment of Project Management Practices in the Meralco Process & Standards Team: Activities and Challenges Throughout the Project Lifecycle

Authors

  • Donna Mae Z. Vargas Graduate School, University of Santo Tomas-Legazpi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23363830

Keywords:

project management practices, project lifecycle, Meralco, project monitoring and control, stakeholder coordination, mixed-methods assessment

Abstract

This study assessed project management practices of the Meralco Process & Standards Team, focusing on awareness, application, challenges across the project lifecycle, and factors relevant to project success. A descriptive mixed-methods design involved 30 purposively selected Business Analysts. Data were collected through a Likert-scale questionnaire, semi-structured interviews, focus group discussions, observations, and reviews of internal project documents. Quantitative responses were summarized descriptively, while qualitative accounts were thematically examined and triangulated with documents. The instrument demonstrated excellent overall internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = .97). Respondents were highly aware of lifecycle practices (overall mean = 4.50), particularly execution (4.78) and initiation (4.63), whereas practices were often applied (overall mean = 3.86), with execution highest (4.09) and monitoring and control lowest (3.63). Perceived challenges across ten knowledge areas were neutral overall (2.59), with schedule management receiving the highest challenge mean (3.35). The qualitative findings identified clear objectives, defined scope, communication, leadership, and teamwork as important perceived conditions for project success; document review highlighted effort-intensive documentation, stakeholder alignment, and testing. Findings indicate an awareness–application gap and support standardized work-planning tools, progress reporting, stakeholder coordination, and practical capacity-building. These recommendations respond to the team’s identified process needs rather than establishing causal effects on project outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adhi, A. B., & Muslim, F. (2023). Development of stakeholder engagement strategies to improve sustainable construction implementation based on lean construction principles in Indonesia. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 6053. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076053

Afridi, K., Turi, J. A., Zaufishan, B., & Rosak-Szyrocka, J. (2023). Impact of digital communications on project efficiency through ease of use and top management support. Heliyon, 9(7), e17941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17941

Aljadhai, S., Alqahtani, F. K., Aldakhel, A., Alharbi, M., & Yamany, M. S. (2025). Assessment of scope definition for building projects in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 24(5), 3863–3878. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2024.2396631

Ammirato, S., Felicetti, A. M., Linzalone, R., Corvello, V., & Kumar, S. (2023). Still our most important asset: A systematic review on human resource management in the midst of the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(3), Article 100403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2023.100403

Cerezo-Narváez, A., Pastor-Fernández, A., Otero-Mateo, M., & Ballesteros-Pérez, P. (2022). The influence of knowledge on managing risk for the success in complex construction projects: The IPMA approach. Sustainability, 14(15), Article 9711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159711

Chepkwony, A. K., Muchelule, Y. W., & Somba, S. M. (2023). Project integration management and performance of National Housing Corporation projects in Kenya. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 13(10), Article p14234. https://doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.13.10.2023.p14234

Faraji, A., Rashidi, M., Perera, S., & Samali, B. (2022). Applicability-compatibility analysis of PMBOK seventh edition from the perspective of the construction industry distinctive peculiarities. Buildings, 12(2), Article 210. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12020210

Issifu, R., & Agyapong, D. (2023). Monitoring and evaluation practices and project outcome of tech start-ups in Ghana: The moderating role of the business environment. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), Article 2279793. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2279793

Khadim, N., Thaheem, M. J., Ullah, F., & Mahmood, M. N. (2023). Quantifying the cost of quality in construction projects: An insight into the base of the iceberg. Quality & Quantity, 57(6), 5403–5429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-023-01720-1

Project Management Institute. (2021). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) and the standard for project management (7th ed.). https://www.pmi.org/standards/pmbok

Reiff, J., & Schlegel, D. (2022). Hybrid project management – A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Systems and Project Management, 10(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.12821/ijispm100203

Santos, J. M. R. C. A., Fernandes, G., Ribeiro, P., Ferreira, L. M. D. F., Barroso, D., & Pinto, E. B. (2024). Key project management practices in collaborative R&D&I projects across activity sectors. Procedia Computer Science, 239, 299–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.06.175

Schrepp, M. (2020). On the usage of Cronbach’s alpha to measure reliability in UX questionnaires. Journal of Usability Studies, 15(4).

Titarenko, R., & da Camara, N. (2025). Investigation of project schedule management challenges underpinned by process approach. PM World Journal, 14(2). https://pmworldjournal.com/article/investigation-of-project-schedule-management-challenges

Varajão, J., Marques, R. P., & Trigo, A. (2022). Project management processes – Impact on the success of information systems projects. Informatica, 33(2), 421–436. https://doi.org/10.15388/22-INFOR488

Downloads

Published

2026-10-14

How to Cite

Vargas, D. M. (2026). An Assessment of Project Management Practices in the Meralco Process & Standards Team: Activities and Challenges Throughout the Project Lifecycle. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(10), 1103-1111. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23363830

Similar Articles

1-10 of 877

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.