Mapping Vocabulary Size Across Frequency Levels: Case of a Japanese Learner of English
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23450154Keywords:
Vocabulary Size, Lexical Threshold, Word Frequency Levels, Receptive Vocabulary Knowledge, Lexical CoverageAbstract
Vocabulary knowledge has been consistently identified as central to second language proficiency and as a strong predictor of language performance. This study investigated the vocabulary size of a Japanese Learner of English (JLE) by examining her performance on the Vocabulary Size Test (VST) alongside a language needs assessment. Drawing on the Lexical Threshold Hypothesis and research on vocabulary size and lexical coverage, the study explored how the informant’s vocabulary knowledge was distributed across frequency levels and how her instructional background and language needs were reflected in her vocabulary size estimate. Results indicated that she currently has a vocabulary size of 7,400-word families, obtained the highest scores at high-frequency word levels, and had variable and declining performance at mid- and low-frequency levels. While this size suggests sufficient coverage for basic spoken discourse and simpler texts, it falls below the thresholds associated with unassisted comprehension of advanced academic and literary texts. Item-level analysis revealed that incorrect responses may have been shaped by classroom-emphasized meaning-inferencing strategies, which contrasted with her reported profile. Moreover, it was found that the majority of the incorrectly answered items involved nouns, particularly abstract concepts or institutional terms that are less likely to appear in everyday conversations. These findings highlight the importance of interpreting vocabulary size estimates in relation to the learners’ profiles and needs, and suggest that mid- and low-frequency vocabulary development should be prioritized to support academic and professional language use.
Downloads
References
Coombs, H. (2022). Case study research: Single or multiple [White paper]. Southern Utah University. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7604301
Hamada, A., Hoshino, Y., Kojima, M., Aizawa, K., Iso, T., & Kobayashi, Y. (2024). How many L2 word meanings can learners recall? A latent trait approach to vocabulary size estimation. Applied Linguistics, advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amae087
Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.
Ibrahim, E. H. E., Sarudin, I., & Muhamad, A. J. (2016). The relationship between vocabulary size and reading comprehension of ESL learners. English Language Teaching, 9(2), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n2p116
Ishikawa, Y., Otaki, A., Okamura, H., & Shirahata, T. (2024). Measuring the English vocabulary acquisition of Japanese learners. Studies in English Language and Education, 11(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v11i1.30460
Itani-Adams, Y. (2007). Lexical and grammatical development in Japanese–English bilingual first language acquisition. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 173–201). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Kaskani, A., Zafiri, M., & Dimogeronta, P. (2021). A needs analysis questionnaire: Designing and evaluation. Journal of English Literature and Language, 2(1), 1–12.
Laufer, B., & McLean, S. (2016). Loanwords and Vocabulary Size Test scores: A case of different estimates for different L1 learners. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(3), 202–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/15434303.2016.1210611
Laufer, B., & Ravenhorst-Kalovski, G. C. (2010). Lexical threshold revisited: Lexical text coverage, learners’ vocabulary size, and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 15–30.
Mirzaeian, V. R. (2020). Developing and validating EFL learners’ perception of machine translation questionnaire. Journal of Foreign Language Research, 10(3), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.22059/jflr.2020.307537.741
Nation, I. S. P. (n.d.). Vocabulary tests. Victoria University of Wellington. https://www.wgtn.ac.nz/lals/resources/paul-nations-resources/vocabulary-tests
Nation, I. S. P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9–13. http://www.jalt-publications.org/archive/tlt/2007/07_2007TLT.pdf
Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland and Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000075
Şen, Y., & Kuleli, M. (2015). The effect of vocabulary size and vocabulary depth on reading in EFL context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 555–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.546
Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2020). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818799371
Uchihara, T., & Harada, T. (2018). Roles of vocabulary knowledge for success in English-medium instruction: Self-perceptions and academic outcomes of Japanese undergraduates. TESOL Quarterly, 52(3), 564–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.453
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
