Science Teachers’ Readiness and Systemic Challenges in the Pilot Implementation of the Strengthened Senior High School Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23598420Keywords:
explanatory sequential mixed method, teacher readiness, systematic challenge, instrument validation, teacher support framework.Abstract
The study examined the science teachers’ readiness and systemic challenges in the pilot implementation of the strengthened senior high school curriculum in selected public schools in the Division of Rizal and Antipolo City. It uses an explanatory sequential mixed-method research design where the quantitative and qualitative data were gathered simultaneously, analyzed separately, and combined at a stage of interpretation. There are 30 science teachers participating in the quantitative component. It measured their readiness in pedagogy, curriculum knowledge, assessment practices, and systemic challenges in related instructional resources, laboratory facilities and equipment, and professional development. Qualitative data were gathered through guided interviews and analyzed using a thematic analysis. The results showed that there is a high readiness of teachers in terms of pedagogy (M-3.62), curriculum knowledge (M-3.60, and assessment practices (M-3.62). However, the challenges regarding instructional materials were experienced to a very great Extent (M-3.26), whereas challenges concerning laboratory facilities (M-2.96) and professional development (M-3.11). No significant relationship was identified between teachers’ readiness and systemic challenges. There are 7 themes that emerged from the qualitative results: transition in curriculum navigation, resource shortages, Management of time and tasks, new curriculum expectations, learner-centered and context-based instruction, stronger professional support, reflective practice, and professional resilience. The combined results show that high readiness and significant systemic barriers can coexist. Consequently, the Sci-Teach READY Teacher Support Framework was formed to strengthen the capacity of science teachers and improve systemic conditions for the successful implementation of the curriculum.
Downloads
References
Addai-Mununkum, R., & Setordzi, S. (2023). Implementing curriculum change in Ghana: Exploring teachers’ experiences with enacting 21st-century pedagogies. American Journal of Qualitative Research, 7(4), 119–137. https://doi.org/10.29333/ajqr/13660
Adeniyi, I. S., Hamad, N. M. A., Adewusi, O. E., Unachukwu, C. C., Osawaru, B., Onyebuchi, C. N., Omolawal, S. A., Aliu, A. O., & David, I. O. (2024). Educational reforms and their impact on student performance: A review in African countries. World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, 21(2), 750–761. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2024.21.2.0490
Afshar, H. S., & Hafez, F. (2021). A mixed-methods investigation of TEFL graduate students’ perspectives of qualitative research: Challenges and solutions in the spotlight. The Qualitative Report, 26(11), 3568–3593. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2021.4614
Agbofa, F. J. K., Mensah, D. K. D., Opoku-Amankwaah, K., Kyeremeh, S., & Adu-Boahen, A. O. (2023). Teachers’ concerns on the implementation of the standards-based curriculum in Ghana: A case of New Juaben North Municipal. Creative Education, 14(5), 1076–1094. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2023.145069
Ampofo, J. A., Abrefi, A. A., & Yao, N. F. (2020). Incorporating ICT into teaching and learning in junior high schools in Ajumako: Challenges for teachers and their support strategies. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research, 2(5), 365–381. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v2i5.174
Anggraeni, V., Sephiana, R. S., Mauluddia, Y., & Agustin, M. (2024). Apakah guru PAUD mampu beradaptasi pada setiap perubahan kurikulum yang terjadi? PAUDIA: Jurnal Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 13(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.26877/paudia.v13i1.17459
Arban, J. C., Enad, F., & Pabalan, A. (2024). The Senior High School Technical-Vocational-Livelihood track: Implementation and challenges. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4975284
Aslam, P., Mushtaq, Q., Noor, F., Maqbool, S., Khan, N. Y., & Sarfraz, J. (2024). The literature review on curriculum implementation problems. Journal of Health and Rehabilitation Research, 4(2), 497–503. https://doi.org/10.61919/jhrr.v4i2.844
Bacus, R. C., & Alda, R. C. (2022). Senior high school teaching: A phenomenological inquiry. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.32890/mjli2022.19.1.9
Bagnall, C., Stevenson, E., Cookson, D., Jones, F. R., & Garnett, N. J. (2024). A mixed-methods evaluation of a longitudinal primary–secondary school transitions support intervention. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, Article 1252851. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1252851
Baluyos, G., Toring, A. R. M., Gahut, M. J. C., Tagaan, D. J. P., Quiap, K. G. P., & Maliao, H. A. (2020). The level of readiness of Misamis University in the implementation of the new curricula. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 8(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcets.v8i1.37105
Bildik, C., & Altun, S. (2022). Uygulamadaki boşluğa, öğretim programı penceresinden bir bakış: 2018 ilkokul ve ortaokul İngilizce öğretim programının incelenmesi. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(2), 1196–1221. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1196707
Bravo, C. V., Kenigs, O. A., & Zamora, M. P. T. (2025). Examining the role of curriculum evaluation in schools: A challenge for pedagogical leadership. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 17(3), 413–425. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2025.413
Buabeng, I., & Amo-Darko, B. (2025). Curriculum reforms without foundation: The effects of inadequate preparation in curriculum reforms on Ghanaian teachers and the education system. Curriculum Perspectives, 45(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00309-7
Chandrakumar, S., & Vivek, R. (2023). A critical review of the mixed method application and its criticism. Social Work and Education, 10(2), 242–255. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.23.2.8
Christensen, A. S. (2024). Knowledge, capabilities, or problems? 3 curricular principles and their consequences using social studies as example. Research Portal Denmark.
Çöğmen, S., & Özelçi, S. Y. (2024). Teachers as implementers: A systematic review of curriculum literacy. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(2), 1538–1560. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1508308
Colebra, J., & Luna, E. D. (2025). An exploratory analysis of Support, Engagement, and Commitment (SEC) of school administrators to teacher research programs. International Journal of Management and Administration, 9(18), 98–112. https://doi.org/10.29064/ijma.1761633
Costa, J. (2024). Mixed methods in educational large-scale studies: Integrating qualitative perspectives into secondary data analysis. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1347. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121347
Demate, D. R. B., Aclis, M. S., Catbagan, F. C. P., Molina, G. F., Ramos, N. U., & Patacsil, F. F. (2025). Teacher perspectives on MATATAG curriculum: Challenges and collaborative solutions. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 8(11), Article 2025351. https://doi.org/10.31893/multirev.2025351
Demir, M. (2024). A review of literature on mathematics curricula in use at primary school level. Research Square. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-4407272/v1
Díaz, A. O. (2024). Assessment of Senior High School program delivery towards quality assurance: Evidence from the Philippines. Education Sustainability & Society, 7(2), 74–83. https://doi.org/10.26480/ess.02.2024.74.83
Diem, H. T. T., Thinh, M. P., & Lam, V. (2024). Exploring practical pedagogy in high school biology education: A qualitative study of pre-service biology teachers’ experiences in Vietnam. European Journal of Educational Research, 13(2), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.2.557
Fuentes, M. (2025). Teacher experiences, challenges, and support needs in the implementation of the Philippine MATATAG curriculum: An integrative literature review. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(12), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.716
Ghamoushi, M., Mohamadi, Z., & Hashamdar, M. (2022). Development and validation of a potential assessment inventory for assessing EFL teachers’ ecological agency. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), Article 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-022-00190-5
Gierus, B., Du, T., Maduforo, A. N., Gilbert, B. G., & Koh, K. (2025). Prevalence and quality of mixed methods research in educational subdisciplines: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 15(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251335171
Haile, T. M., & Mekonnen, E. A. (2024). Impacts of stakeholder engagement on curriculum implementation in Ethiopian Defense University. Pedagogical Research, 9(2), Article em0192. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14369
Hambabi, K. T., Tileni, N. L. L., & Chirimbana, M. (2024). Exploring teachers’ perspectives and challenges in implementing the revised biology education curriculum: A case study of the Ompundja circuit. Creative Education, 15(5), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2024.155051
Jatmiko, A., Asyhari, A., Irwandani, İ., & Soeharto, S. (2023). The role of self-concept in modulating the effectiveness of nature-based science instruction. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(4), 552–563. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i4.48287
Johannesen, H. J., Malich-Bohlig, N., Petersen, L., & Dam-Christensen, E. (2024). Interdisciplinary collaboration in videographic teaching observation (InCoViTO). Research Portal Denmark.
Johnson, H. L., McClintock, E., & Leech, N. L. (2022). A multifocal lens on qualitative data analysis: An affordance of networking theoretical approaches. HAL Open Science. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03749217
Kadırhan, Z., & Şat, M. (2025). A review of studies on the Türkiye Century Maarif Model. Temel Eğitim, 7(1), 173–188. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/temelegitim/issue/86975/1730094
Kajfez, R., Lee, D., Ehlert, K., Faber, C., Benson, L., & Kennedy, M. (2021). A mixed method approach to understanding researcher identity. Studies in Engineering Education, 2(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.21061/see.24
Law, M. A. (2024). Human Dignity Curriculum: Teachers’ comfort, commitment, and perceived support teaching a new socioemotional learning curriculum. Frontiers in Education, 9, Article 1427079. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1427079
Limiansi, K., Aw, S., Paidi, P., & Setiawan, C. (2023). Biology teachers’ perspective on change of curriculum policy: A case for implementation of “Independent” curriculum. The Qualitative Report, 28(12), 3521–3540. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6204
Lubis, S. H., Fauzıatı, E., & Rochsantiningsih, D. (2023). Merdeka Belajar Curriculum: A study on EFL teachers’ varying expressions of agency. Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(2), 335–348. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i2.22517
Malinao, A. J., & Miano, J. J. (2025). Implementing the MATATAG curriculum: A qualitative study on teachers’ challenges, adaptation strategies, and support needs. Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 3(5), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2025.133
Markham, Z. J. (2025). Illuminating teacher lived experiences in the new revised curriculum. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 43(5), 609–620. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.430506
McChesney, K. (2021). Extending understandings. The New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 26, 96–112. https://doi.org/10.26686/nzaroe.v26.6898
Mekheimer, M. A. (2025). Effective technology integration in higher education: A mixed-methods study of professional development. Education and Information Technologies, 30(1), 1205–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13750-y
Minadzi, V. M., Davis, E. K., & Ababio, B. T. (2022). Exploring headteachers, teachers and learners’ perceptions of instructional effectiveness of distance trained teachers. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(8), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.8.4
Minnaert, A. (2023). An epistemological shift forward. In Routledge eBooks (p. 274). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003303473-20
Montoya, G., Díaz, F. J. G., & Usquiano, M. M. (2025). Beyond educational policies: Intercultural bilingual education teachers and the use of multimedia content in indigenous languages. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 16(5), 1445–1456. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1605.01
Mordzeh-Ekpampo, I. M., Ernest, D. A., Holu, E. M., & Kadiri, M. (2025). Teachers perception towards the Basic (1-6) Standards-Based Curriculum in Ghana: A study at North Gonja District. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 9(3), 7029–7042. https://doi.org/10.47772/ijriss.2025.903sedu0520
Motsi, L., & Makgato-Khunou, P. (2024). Influential factors for successful adoption of future school curriculum. African Journal of Teacher Education and Development, 3(1), Article 35. https://doi.org/10.4102/ajoted.v3i1.35
Musandu, C., Jita, L. C., & Bada, A. A. (2023). Teachers’ opinion and experiences of the application of instructional leadership: Evidence from history teachers. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2023.2274362
Nikoçeviq-Kurti, E., Saqipi, B., & Kaçaniku, F. (2025). Navigating change: Exploring the interplay between teachers’ understanding of curriculum reform and their self-efficacy. Curriculum Perspectives, 45(2), 117–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-025-00308-8
Niu, H., & Niranjan, M. (2025). Teacher digital competence in New Zealand primary schools: A qualitative study of integration practices, challenges, and cultural considerations. The Australian Educational Researcher, 52(1), 115–138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-025-00912-7
Ntumi, S., Agbenyo, S., Tetteh, A., Yalley, C. E., Yeboah, A., & Nimo, D. G. (2023). Teacher preparedness and implementation of the National Pre-Tertiary Education Curriculum Framework in Ghana. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(1), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2023.13.1.18
Oranga, J. (2025). Mixed methods research: Merits, applications and challenges. International Journal of Social Science, 5(2), 233–245. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v5i2.11034
Oranga, J., Matere, A., & Njurai, E. W. (2025). The mixed methods research approach: An overview. Postmodernism Problems, 15(1), 84–99. https://doi.org/10.46324/pmp2501084
O’Sullivan, P., Kuper, A., & Cleland, J. (2024). Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research? Advances in Health Sciences Education, 29(4), 1071–1085. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10362-y
Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & García, E. S. (2020). The adaptive challenges of curriculum implementation: Insights for educational leaders driving standards-based reform. AERA Open, 6(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932828
Peters, M., & Fàbregues, S. (2023). Missed opportunities in mixed methods EdTech research? Visual joint display development as an analytical strategy for achieving integration in mixed methods studies. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(5), 2477–2501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10234-z
Pregoner, J. D. (2025). Research approaches in education: A comparison of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods. SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5111007
Rana, K., & Chimoriya, R. (2025). A guide to a mixed-methods approach to healthcare research. Encyclopedia, 5(2), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia5020051
Sharma, L. R., Bidari, S., Bidari, D., Neupane, S., & Sapkota, R. (2023). Exploring the mixed methods research design: Types, purposes, strengths, challenges, and criticisms. Global Academic Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 5(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.36348/gajll.2023.v05i01.002
Taylor, N., Mazariego, C., Baffsky, R., Liang, S., Wolfenden, L., Presseau, J., Fontaine, G., Carland, J. E., Shiner, C. T., Wise, S., Debono, D., McKay, S., Best, S., & Morrow, A. (2025). Advancing the speed and science of implementation using mixed-methods process mapping – Best practice recommendations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 24, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069251340908
Teacher education for transformative agency: Critical perspectives on design, content and pedagogy. (2020). African Sun Media. https://doi.org/10.18820/9781928480938
Tholchah, M. (2025). A light from Finland: Uncovering teachers’ role in evaluating students’ learning through parent-teacher conferences. Journal of Integrated Elementary Education, 5(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.21580/jieed.v5i1.22753
Versfeld, J., Graham, M. A., & Ebersöhn, L. (2022). Time to flock: Time together strengthens relationships and enhances trust to teach despite challenges. Teachers and Teaching, 29(1), 70–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2022.2145279
Wawire, B. A., Kiambati, F., Muhia, N., Gathoni, G., & Abuya, B. (2025). Competence-based curriculum implementation in Africa: A scoping review of pedagogical and assessment practices. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 57(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2025.2523429
Xiao-hong, D., Sha, S., & Xiao-yan, D. (2025). Designing structured curricula to enhance teaching competencies: Integrating teaching methods course clusters in pre-service teacher education. Pedagogy and Psychology of Sport, 23, Article 61660. https://doi.org/10.12775/pps.2025.23.61660
Yamota, N. Y. B. (2025). Challenges in the adoption process of the revised K to 10 curriculum: A qualitative descriptive study using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation Theory. International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, 12(5), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.51244/ijrsi.2025.12050006
Yulin, N., & Danso, S. D. (2025). Assessing pedagogical readiness for digital innovation: A mixed-methods study. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2502.15781
Zhang, X., Rahman, M. N. A., Wahab, H. B. A., & Li, Q. (2025). How mentor teachers and emotions influence professional identity and career decisions of preservice preschool teachers. Frontiers in Education, 10, Article 1569062. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1569062
Zhou, Y., Zhou, Y., Machtmes, K., Zhou, Y., & Machtmes, K. (2023). Mixed methods integration strategies used in education: A systematic review. Methodological Innovations, 17(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/20597991231217937
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
