Enablers and Barriers to Foundational Literacy and Numeracy: A Multi-Division Assessment of the National Reading Program (NRP) Intervention
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23670092Keywords:
administrative support, foundational literacy, foundational numeracy, implementation consistency, national reading program, reading interventionAbstract
This study assessed the institutional, instructional, and contextual factors influencing the implementation of the National Reading Program (NRP) across nine school divisions in Region II, Philippines. A comparative multiple-case implementation assessment was employed, involving 180 public elementary school teachers and reading coordinators selected through equal-allocation stratified random sampling, with 20 respondents from each division. Of these participants, 18 were purposively selected for semistructured interviews. Survey responses, interview accounts, and program documents were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests, Holm-adjusted Dunn comparisons, ordinal logistic regression, and framework-guided thematic analysis. Findings indicated significant differences in implementation consistency across divisions (H = 29.136, p < .001), with only 39.4% of respondents reporting consistent or highly consistent program delivery. Teacher preparedness (aOR = 2.15), administrative support (aOR = 1.82), and family engagement (aOR = 1.70) were positively associated with implementation consistency, whereas operational barriers demonstrated a significant negative association (aOR = 0.45). Qualitative findings identified inadequate differentiated reading materials, competing instructional responsibilities, limited parental participation, and inconsistent progress monitoring as persistent challenges. Although available records indicated improvements in reading proficiency, incomplete assessment documentation limited conclusions regarding intervention effectiveness and its relationship with numeracy development. The findings emphasized the need for sustained instructional assistance, differentiated resource allocation, stronger family participation, and standardized assessment procedures to improve the delivery and evaluation of foundational learning interventions.
Downloads
References
Amland, T., Grande, G., Scherer, R., Lervåg, A., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2025). Cognitive factors underlying mathematical skills: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 151(1), 88–129. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000457
Crawford, M., Raheel, N., Korochkina, M., & Rastle, K. (2025). Inadequate foundational decoding skills constrain global literacy goals for pupils in low- and middle-income countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 9, 74–83. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02028-x
D'Agostino, T. J., Brown Guzmán, D., Perrin, P., Liberiste-Osirus, A., & Schuenke-Lucien, K. (2024). Explaining variation in treatment effects: An impact evaluation and mixed-methods study of variation in early grade reading program effects. Comparative Education Review, 68(1), 85–112. https://doi.org/10.1086/728393
Dahl-Leonard, K., Hall, C., & Capin, P. (2025). Exploring the feasibility of implementing the SPELL-Links to Reading and Writing intervention. Annals of Dyslexia, 75, 71–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-024-00315-w
Dahl-Leonard, K., Mesa, M. P., Haring, C., & Zucker, T. A. (2026). Strategies for supporting implementation of a kindergarten supplemental reading curriculum. The Elementary School Journal. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1086/743248
Damschroder, L. J., Reardon, C. M., Widerquist, M. A. O., & Lowery, J. (2022). The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback. Implementation Science, 17, Article 75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0
Department of Education. (2023). Adoption of the National Learning Recovery Program in the Department of Education (DepEd Order No. 013, s. 2023).
Department of Education. (2025). Implementing guidelines of the Academic Recovery and Accessible Learning Program (DepEd Order No. 018, s. 2025).
Duflo, A., Kiessel, J., & Lucas, A. M. (2024). Experimental evidence on four policies to increase learning at scale. The Economic Journal, 134(661), 1985–2008. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueae003
Ehlert, M., De Smedt, F., Van Keer, H., & Souvignier, E. (2025). Time tells: Longitudinal changes in teachers' beliefs and behaviour when implementing reading innovations. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 40, Article 74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-025-00975-1
Jago, L. S., Monaghan, P., Alcock, K., & Cain, K. (2025). The effect of preschool vocabulary and grammar on early reading comprehension and word reading: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 47, Article 100680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2025.100680
Kaffenberger, M., Angrist, N., Hwa, Y.-Y., Kayton, H. L., Jukes, M., & Stern, J. (2026). Core components of teaching at the right level: Unpacking the black box of proven programmes into a set of core components by systematically combining multiple sources of rigorous evidence with implementer insights (Core Components Synthesis No. 2026/001). What Works Hub for Global Education. https://doi.org/10.35489/BSG-WhatWorksHubforGlobalEducation-WP_2026/001
Keles, S., ten Braak, D., Hagen, Å. M., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2025). Validity of early-grade screening tools in the three tier (RTI/MTSS) model: A systematic review and meta-analysis of literacy, language, and mathematics. Educational Psychology Review, 37, Article 104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10077-5
Liu, A., He, H., Tu, X. M., & Tang, W. (2023). On testing proportional odds assumptions for proportional odds models. General Psychiatry, 36(3), Article e101048. https://doi.org/10.1136/gpsych-2023-101048
McChesney, K., & Cross, J. (2023). How school culture affects teachers' classroom implementation of learning from professional development. Learning Environments Research, 26, 785–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-023-09454-0
Mesa, M. P., Hall, C., Zucker, T., Dahl-Leonard, K., Oh, Y., & Denton, C. (2024). Unpacking implementation: Fidelity and barriers to implementation of a kindergarten reading intervention by teachers. The Elementary School Journal, 125(1), 77–105. https://doi.org/10.1086/731257
Moussa, W., Louge, N., Pauwelyn, L., Contreras-Gomez, R., & Cao, Y. (2024). Should teachers stick to the script? Examining the effects of scripted lessons on student literacy in Madagascar. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, Article 102290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102290
Nag, S., Vagh, S. B., Dulay, K. M., Snowling, M., Donolato, E., & Melby-Lervåg, M. (2024). Home learning environments and children's language and literacy skills: A meta-analytic review of studies conducted in low- and middle-income countries. Psychological Bulletin, 150(2), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000417
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2026). PISA 2025 results (Volume I): Philippines
Petersen-Brown, S., Hawley, E. K., Fischer, E., & Schneider, M. (2024). A review and meta-analysis of literacy interventions implemented by caregivers at home. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 68(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2022.2158161
Philippine Statistics Authority. (2025, April 4). For every 10 Filipinos, 9 have basic literacy, while 7 have functional literacy (Reference No. 2025-118).
van Dijk, W., Lane, H. B., & Gage, N. A. (2023). How do intervention studies measure the relation between implementation fidelity and students' reading outcomes? A systematic review. The Elementary School Journal, 124(1), 56–84. https://doi.org/10.1086/725672
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
