Exploring the Acceptance and Integration of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Nursing Education: Perspectives of Nurse Educators
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23767179Keywords:
generative artificial intelligence, nursing education, nurse educators, technology acceptance, instructional integration, qualitative thematic analysisAbstract
This qualitative descriptive study explored how nurse educators at Olivarez College Tagaytay, Cavite, accepted and integrated generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in nursing education and developed an evidence-informed action plan. Eight purposively selected nurse educators who had used GenAI in teaching participated in semi-structured, in-depth interviews during August 2026. The interview guide was expert-validated, and recordings were transcribed and examined through Braun and Clarke’s six-phase thematic analysis. Data collection occurred in three waves; 125 codes were organized into six themes and 16 subthemes. The themes were unplanned entry into a necessary technology; conditional acceptance anchored in professional judgment; adapting under generational pressure; integration at the preparation stage; safeguarding learning through vigilance and assessment redesign; and enablement by leadership without written policy. Educators perceived GenAI as useful for preparing lessons, cases, questions, and simplified learning materials but insisted on verifying outputs and protecting clinical judgment, empathy, academic integrity, and patient safety. Integration remained largely preparatory and individualized, while participants described uneven digital confidence, assessment vulnerabilities, personal subscription costs, and the absence of consistent written rules despite administrative encouragement. The findings indicate a gap between conditional acceptance and systematic pedagogical integration. A five-component action plan addressing governance, differentiated faculty development, assessment integrity, student AI literacy, and technical access was proposed, not evaluated. The study contributes institution-specific evidence to responsible GenAI adoption in nursing education.
Downloads
References
Bradshaw, C., Atkinson, S., & Doody, O. (2017). Employing a qualitative description approach in health care research. Global Qualitative Nursing Research, 4, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2333393617742282
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Buchanan, C., Howitt, M. L., Wilson, R., Booth, R. G., Risling, T., & Bamford, M. (2021). Predicted influences of artificial intelligence on nursing education: Scoping review. JMIR Nursing, 4(1), e23933. https://doi.org/10.2196/23933
Commission on Higher Education. (2026). Policies, standards, and guidelines for the framework on artificial intelligence in higher education (CHED Memorandum Order No. 21, series of 2026). https://ched.gov.ph/
Corbin, T., Dawson, P., & Liu, D. (2025). Talk is cheap: Why structural assessment changes are needed for a time of GenAI. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(7), 1087–1097. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2503964
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers' technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2011.10782576
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nessler, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lane, S. H., Haley, T., & Brackney, D. E. (2024). Tool or tyrant: Guiding and guarding generative artificial intelligence use in nursing education. Creative Nursing, 30(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/10784535241247094
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/naturalistic-inquiry/book842
Mah, D.-K., & Groß, N. (2024). Artificial intelligence in higher education: Exploring faculty use, self-efficacy, distinct profiles, and professional development needs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, Article 58. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00490-1
Malterud, K., Siersma, V. D., & Guassora, A. D. (2016). Sample size in qualitative interview studies: Guided by information power. Qualitative Health Research, 26(13), 1753–1760. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617444
McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2021). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (5th ed.). Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://www.jblearning.com/catalog/productdetails/9781284220469
Miao, F., & Cukurova, M. (2024). AI competency framework for teachers. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers
Miao, F., & Holmes, W. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.54675/EWZM9535
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23(4), 334–340. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4%3C334::AID-NUR9%3E3.0.CO;2-G
Topol, E. (2019). Deep medicine: How artificial intelligence can make healthcare human again. Basic Books. https://www.basicbooks.com/titles/eric-topol/deep-medicine/9781541644649/
World Health Organization. (2024). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: Guidance on large multi-modal models. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240084759
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.