Improving BTLED-HE2 Students’ Skills in Cable Installation Diagram Layouting Through Guided Use of EdrawMax

Authors

  • Elyboy P. Bonggo Davao Oriental State University, Philippines Author
  • China Lou R. Ayco Davao Oriental State University, Philippines Author
  • James Carl H. Banuay Davao Oriental State University, Philippines Author
  • Mary Jean O. Silongan Davao Oriental State University, Philippines Author
  • Christian John M. Manginsawana Davao Oriental State University, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24096043

Keywords:

Cable Installation Diagram Layouting, BTLED-HE2 Students, Guided EdrawMax Technique, Technical Skills, Action Research, Technology-Based Learning

Abstract

This classroom-based action research examined whether the Guided EdrawMax Technique improved the cable installation diagram layouting skills of BTLED-HE2 students at Davao Oriental State University. Baseline assessment showed difficulties in symbol placement, cable-path arrangement, diagram organization, and the application of standard layouting procedures. A quantitative one-group pre-test–post-test design was used with 23 purposively selected students. The four-week intervention combined step-by-step demonstrations, supervised practice, immediate feedback, and hands-on diagram activities using EdrawMax. Outputs were scored with a 30-point Cable Installation Diagram Layouting Performance Rubric. The mean score rose from 13.00 (SD = 3.02) in the pre-test to 27.83 (SD = 0.78) in the post-test. A paired-samples t-test showed a statistically significant increase, t(22) = 22.94, p < .001, with a very large paired-data effect size (Cohen’s dz = 4.78). All 23 students scored below the 61% mastery criterion before the intervention, whereas all obtained Very Good ratings afterward. These results show substantial improvement in students’ performance following the intervention. Because the design had no comparison group, the findings do not establish causation; replication with a stronger design and complete inter-rater reliability reporting is recommended.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dilling, F., & Vogler, A. (2021). Fostering spatial ability through computer-aided design: A case study. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 7, 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-021-00084-w

Ekpenyong, I. M., & Patrick, A.-N. (2024). The electrical installation and maintenance skills required for self-reliance among students of electrical technology in colleges of education. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(1), 1680–1686.

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2023). How to design and evaluate research in education (11th ed.). McGraw Hill.

Katona, J., & Nagy, K. G. (2019). The CAD 3D course improves students’ spatial skills in technology and design education. YBL Journal of Built Environment, 7(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.2478/jbe-2019-0002

Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research planner. Deakin University Press.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Komarudin, K., Marji, M., Sutadji, E., & Widiyanti, W. (2024). Effectiveness of the EPI electrical media to electrical diagram read ability. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, 30(3). https://doi.org/10.52152/kuey.v30i3.446

Kösa, T., & Karakuş, F. (2018). The effects of computer-aided design software on engineering students’ spatial visualisation skills. European Journal of Engineering Education, 43(2), 296–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2017.1370578

Lobitos, O. A., Apat, J. J., Amoson, K. T., & Cotiangco, J. G. S. (2023). Impact of AutoCAD among engineering and architecture students in Butuan City, Agusan del Norte. International Journal of Research in Science & Engineering, 3(6), 8–20. https://doi.org/10.55529/ijrise.36.8.20

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Mertler, C. A. (2021). Introduction to educational research. SAGE Publications.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent: The future of education. Grossman Publishers.

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

Tidal, A.-M. R., De Asis, R. M., & Namoco, S. O. (2024). Acceptability of self-learning module using SketchUp to improve spatial intelligence of technical drawing students. Science International, 36(3), 289–293.

Valera, A. R., Namoco, S. O., & San Diego, A. L. (2021). Effectiveness of 3D solid model on improving spatial visualization ability for technical drafting students. Science International, 33(3), 159–164.

Downloads

Published

2026-11-10

How to Cite

Bonggo, E., Ayco, C. L., Banuay, J. C., Silongan, M. J., & Manginsawana, C. J. (2026). Improving BTLED-HE2 Students’ Skills in Cable Installation Diagram Layouting Through Guided Use of EdrawMax. International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(11), 892-897. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24096043

Similar Articles

1-10 of 1206

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.