Students' Grammatical Errors in Narrative Writing: Narrative-Based Grammar Enhancement Program (NB-GEP)

Authors

  • Mercy L. Alejandrino University of Perpetual Help System Dalta, Las Piñas City, Philippines Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24085949

Keywords:

collaborative narrative writing, grammatical awareness, thematic diversity, stylistic preferences, storytelling, self-discovery, linguistic precision, peer collaboration

Abstract

This study examined the experiences of students engaged in collaborative narrative writing within an academic setting, focusing on stylistic preferences, grammatical awareness, and emerging thematic patterns. It aimed to explore how collaborative writing processes influence narrative development, linguistic accuracy, and thematic expression while addressing persistent challenges in students’ grammatical proficiency. Employing a qualitative research design grounded in narrative inquiry, the study gathered data through written outputs, reflective accounts, and collaborative writing activities. Data were analyzed using stylistic analysis, grammatical error categorization, and thematic coding to identify structural and experiential dimensions of narrative writing. Findings revealed diverse stylistic preferences, including vivid descriptions, humor, character-driven storytelling, non-linear narratives, and social commentary. Collaborative writing encouraged participants to discover and refine their individual narrative voices while learning from different storytelling approaches. Grammatical analysis identified recurring errors involving subject-verb agreement, run-on sentences, tense consistency, dialogue punctuation, and pronoun-antecedent agreement. However, peer interaction fostered greater grammatical awareness, linguistic precision, and narrative coherence. Thematic analysis revealed patterns of metaphorical expression, historical references, identity formation, self-reflection, and imaginative storytelling. These findings indicate that collaborative narrative writing provides meaningful opportunities to strengthen grammatical competence, creativity, and thematic exploration. The study concluded that integrating collaborative writing strategies into classroom instruction can enhance students’ technical and expressive writing abilities. It recommends structured writing workshops, targeted grammar interventions, peer feedback activities, and guided narrative prompts to promote active participation, creative expression, and improved writing proficiency. These instructional practices may support effective narrative writing development among students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmed, Y., & Wagner, R. K. (2022). The not-so-simple view of writing in struggling readers and writers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 38(6), 507–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1948374

Allami, H., & Shafiei, M. (2025). The impact of sociocultural theory–informed instruction on IELTS writing performance. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 10, Article 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00310-z

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. Longman.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Brown, H. D. (2014). Principles of language learning and teaching (6th ed.). Pearson.

Cen, Y. (2024). The motivational aspect of feedback: A meta-analysis on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 64, Article 101117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101117

Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass.

De Smedt, F., Bouwer, R., Limpo, T., & Graham, S. (2024). Conceptualizing, designing, implementing, and evaluating writing interventions. Journal of Writing Research, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2024.16.01.01

Diep, G. L., & Diep, L. T. N. (2024). An analysis of coherence and cohesion in English majors’ essays. International Journal of Language Instruction, 3(3), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24331

Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data (Rev. ed.). MIT Press.

Fleckenstein, J., Keller, M. M., & Hoth, J. (2023). Automated feedback and writing: A multi-level meta-analysis. Frontiers in Education, 8, Article 1185802. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1185802

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Genette, G. (2023). Narrative discourse revisited (Updated ed.). Cornell University Press.

Gibaldi, J. (2021). MLA handbook (9th ed.). Modern Language Association.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Herman, D. (2022). The Cambridge introduction to narrative (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2022). Second language writing: Integrating genre and register. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 58, Article 101113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2022.101113

Kaur, M. C., Yap, W. L., & Chan, S. (2025). Online peer feedback in EFL writing: A systematic review. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 14(1), 184–204. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v14n1p184

Kim, Y.-S. G., Petscher, Y., & Otaiba, S. A. (2024). Enhancing reading and writing through integrated instruction. The Reading Teacher, 78(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.2307

Kobayashi, H., & Ichikawa, K. (2024). Combining multimodal technology-mediated and peer feedback in L2 writing. Computer Assisted Language Learning. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2443770

Kramsch, C. (1998). Language and culture. Oxford University Press.

Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2022). Reading images: The grammar of visual design (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Li, Z., Zheng, Y., & Wang, H. (2025). The effects of peer tutoring on L2 writing: A meta-analysis. International Journal of TESOL & Learning, 14(1), 45–60.

Lunsford, A. A. (2022). The St. Martin’s handbook (9th ed.). Bedford/St. Martin’s.

Mayer, R. E., & Fiorella, L. (2023). Principles for multimedia learning: A concise guide. Cambridge University Press.

Mohsen, M. A., & Almudrashi, M. (2022). Computer-mediated corrective feedback to improve L2 writing: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 60(7), 1729–1758. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331211064066

Odlin, T. (2022). Explorations of language transfer. Multilingual Matters.

Scherer, S., Panadero, E., & Heene, M. (2024). How effective is feedback for L1, L2, and FL learners’ writing? A meta-analysis. Learning and Instruction, 87, Article 101779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101779

Tabari, M. A. (2023). Automated analysis of cohesive features in L2 writing: Task complexity and repetition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 62, Article 101155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101155

Tahang, H. (2024). Students’ grammatical mistakes in composing narrative text. Journal of Language Education, 5(1), 1–12.

Tomasello, M. (2023). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.

Tran, N. T. (2024). Exploring the challenges of L1 negative transfer among Vietnamese EFL learners. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(3), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n3p45

Vuogan, A., & Lee, J. (2023). The effectiveness of peer feedback in second language writing: A meta-analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 57(4), 1557–1589. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3178

Wang, X., Li, J., & Sun, Y. (2025). Roles of L1 transfer, L2 exposure, and morphological salience in bilinguals’ English morpheme production. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, Article 1566442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1566442

Downloads

Published

2026-11-09

How to Cite

Alejandrino, M. (2026). Students’ Grammatical Errors in Narrative Writing: Narrative-Based Grammar Enhancement Program (NB-GEP). International Journal of Education, Research, and Innovation Perspectives, 2(11), 852-891. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24085949

Similar Articles

1-10 of 634

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.